Re: sparc64 5.0
Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was; Can you say exactly what is better? I found 4.9 very nice and had no issues running it on a server.
sparc64 5.0
Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was; Someone recently told me that Solaris uses SMI labels on its disks, is this the same with OpenBSD? RT
Re: sparc64 5.0
On 24 January 2012 22:51, Richard Thornton thornton.rich...@gmail.com wrote: Now that I have it setup with the correct package path, etc, I am finding out 5.0 is much better than 4.9 was; That's the beauty of OpenBSD - it keeps getting better, thanks to all the developers efforts. Someone recently told me that Solaris uses SMI labels on its disks, is this the same with OpenBSD? No. See disklabel (8) and newfs(8) for more information. hth Fred