Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
On 18/05/2016 06:11, Roderick wrote: It seems, the troll was successfull by generating a discussion. :) You cannot compare sam with ed. The first is not a line editor. Methinks that Joel was referring to the ed joke: http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.html jog Plan9 has a lot of conceptual improvements over Unix/BSD. See: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/sam/ Rodrigo. On Wed, 18 May 2016, Joel Wir�mu Pauling wrote: ed() QED. On 18 May 2016 at 14:33, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: acme(1) Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
- Original Message - > In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury > from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your > health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't > like and wish there were a better choice by default. For your use case, might be worth exploring http://spacemacs.org/ then. I'm personally sticking to Vi[m] and never tried that hybrid editor but some friend of mine is enthusiastic about it as it allegedly combines the best of both worlds (Emacs engine, Vi key bindings). Cheers, Marco -- Marco Bonetti
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
It seems, the troll was successfull by generating a discussion. :) You cannot compare sam with ed. The first is not a line editor. Plan9 has a lot of conceptual improvements over Unix/BSD. See: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/sam/ Rodrigo. On Wed, 18 May 2016, Joel WirÄmu Pauling wrote: > ed() > > QED. > > > On 18 May 2016 at 14:33, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > >>> acme(1) >> >> Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 19:33 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > acme(1) > > Or sam(1) if you are a purist. > emacs nXML mode https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_mono/nxml-mode.html + Practical Ontologies for Information Professionals, David Stuart http://www.facetpublishing.co.uk/title.php?id=300624#.VzvqNvp4fod = about as smart as it gets
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
ed() QED. On 18 May 2016 at 14:33, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > > acme(1) > > Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
> In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury > from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your > health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't > like and wish there were a better choice by default. acme(1)
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
> acme(1) Or sam(1) if you are a purist.
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
In all seriousness, Richard Stallman incurred a repetitive stress injury from using emacs commands. Holding down Ctrl or Alt can be bad for your health. That's why I generally use vi even though there are things I don't like and wish there were a better choice by default.
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:25:45AM +0100, trebol55...@yandex.ru wrote: > mg(1) > > […] It is compatible with emacs because > there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or > vi(1). > > Where is the troll, where is the silly troll? > Given enough time, a UNIX user's likelihood to use one of the two approaches 1. Why not support both sane configurations out of the box?
Re: vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
You are all wrong. The correct answer is pico. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:36 PM, wrote: > // mg(1) > // > // [â¦] It is compatible with emacs because > // there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs > or > // vi(1). > // > // Where is the troll, where is the silly troll? > > Well, the sarcasm doesn't work good in a mail, so: > > - Use the editor that you like, editors war is the most retarded > discussion you can have in your life. > > - You can't make such a statement in a man page, and then call a troll to > someone who ask which one is better.
vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
// mg(1) // // […] It is compatible with emacs because // there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or // vi(1). // // Where is the troll, where is the silly troll? The sarcasm doesn't work good in an email, so: - Use the editor you like, editors war is the most retarded discussion you can have in your life. - You can't make such a statement in a man page, and then call a troll to someone who ask which one is better.
vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
// mg(1) // // […] It is compatible with emacs because // there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or // vi(1). // // Where is the troll, where is the silly troll? Well, the sarcasm doesn't work good in a mail, so: - Use the editor that you like, editors war is the most retarded discussion you can have in your life. - You can't make such a statement in a man page, and then call a troll to someone who ask which one is better.
vi vs emacs, which one makes me look more smart in front of my friends?
mg(1) […] It is compatible with emacs because there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi(1). Where is the troll, where is the silly troll?
