Re: pf for routers?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Beavis wrote: Greetings List, I would like to ask if someone has done routing via pf(4) (non-NAT rules). My idea is to be able to route packets from one interface to the other. say from tun0 to rl0. I've been googling a lot and most of the rules im seeing have something to do with NAT routes. any help would be awesomely appreciated. What is the problem you are trying to solve, and what have you tried so far? And why pf(4) instead of route(8)? Joachim
Taller sobre el Manual Administrativo de Obras Públicas, 5 de Octubre en México D.F.
[IMAGE] Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes datos. Empresa: Nombre: Telifono: Email: Nzmero de Interesados: Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento. O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un ejecutivo con gusto le atendera Tels. (33) 8851-2365, (33)8851-2741. Copyright (C) 2010, PMS Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico S.C. Derechos Reservados. PMS de Mixico, El logo de PMS de Mixico son marcas registradas. ADVERTENCIA PMS de Mixico no cuenta con alianzas estratigicas de ningzn tipo dentro de la Republica Mexicana. NO SE DEJE ENGAQAR - DIGA NO A LA PIRATERIA. Todos los logotipos, marcas comerciales e imagenes son propiedad de sus respectivas corporaciones y se utilizan con fines informativos solamente. Este Mensaje ha sido enviado a misc@openbsd.org como usuario de Pms de Mixico o bien un usuario le refiris para recibir este boletmn. Como usuario de Pms de Mixico, en este acto autoriza de manera expresa que Pms de Mixico le puede contactar vma correo electrsnico u otros medios. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, haga caso omiso de el y reporte su cuenta respondiendo este correo con el subject BAJAOBRA. Unsubscribe to this mailing list, reply a blank message with the subject UNSUBSCRIBE BAJAOBRA Tenga en cuenta que la gestisn de nuestras bases de datos es de suma importancia y no es intencisn de la empresa la inconformidad del receptor. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of manual_administrativo_obra.jpg]
Reminder: friends invited you to join Select2gether.
Dear Misc, Lucia Bassano sent a request to add you as a contact on Select2gether. Just a friendly reminder to join Lucia Bassano's network, follow the link below: Join Lucia Bassano's Network Thanks, Lucia Bassano You can remove yourself from Lucia Bassano's network at any time. If you do not wish to receive this type of email from Select2gether in the future, please click here to unsubscribe. Select2gether, 555 Bryant st #444, Palo Alto, CA, 94301 [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/png which had a name of logo-s2g.png] [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of avatar_216db91edbfff7e2ccae7575a88a1399.jpg]
Re: Installing OpenBSD from Linux Xen VPS
I know arpnetworks, their price are really cool, but I need a VPS with an API. :-( On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: There is a much higher potential of variation of implementations of xens and it is next to impossible to find out any particular hosts, xen details. If anyone has these details, maybe they could share, but you may have a more reliable experience with a Linux KVM host. arpnetworks.com (linux KVM) was recommended to me by someone on this list recently and they advertise OpenBSD 4.7 images. On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:47:52 +0700 sonjaya sonj...@gmail.com wrote: i try install in my xen at opensuse , when install success but when reboot after finish installation blank and try againt same happen againt. On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Stephano Zanzin m...@zan.st wrote: Hello, I was wondering if anyone had installed OpenBSD from a Linux VPS running over a Xen hosting(like slicehost, linode, etc). So, someone tried it? -- stephano -- sonjaya http://www.sharenupload.com http://www.farmproxy.com -- stephano
Re: Linux or OpenBSD
Depends what you want to do exactly I suppose... Personally I use Linux based firewalls for many of my sites purely because the clients in question want deep packet inspection (aka OSI layer 7 filtering) done on the network traffic. But that said they are always the second skin firewalls, sitting behind PF firewalls, filtering outbound traffic while the OpenBSD/FreeBSD boxen filter inbound traffic. Thats just my 5c worth and I've always been of the opinion that at least two different skins of firewalls should be deployed, build ontop of different technologies. Makes life a lot harder for whomever you want to keep out. Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rikky Taylor rikkytay...@hotmail.co.ukwrote: I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3 interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules. Given identical modern server hardware would I expect a performance difference between an OpenBSD/PF setup and a Linux/IPTables one? Rikky
Re: Linux or OpenBSD
You can to filter layer 7 with snort By example, detect bittorrent and p2p traffic with snort and drop it 2010/9/24 Ross Cameron ross.came...@unix.net Depends what you want to do exactly I suppose... Personally I use Linux based firewalls for many of my sites purely because the clients in question want deep packet inspection (aka OSI layer 7 filtering) done on the network traffic. But that said they are always the second skin firewalls, sitting behind PF firewalls, filtering outbound traffic while the OpenBSD/FreeBSD boxen filter inbound traffic. Thats just my 5c worth and I've always been of the opinion that at least two different skins of firewalls should be deployed, build ontop of different technologies. Makes life a lot harder for whomever you want to keep out. Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rikky Taylor rikkytay...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3 interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules. Given identical modern server hardware would I expect a performance difference between an OpenBSD/PF setup and a Linux/IPTables one? Rikky
MICROCREDITO Haciendo Negocios desde Abajo...Publicidad
MICROCREDITO: Haciendo Negocios desde abajo - Conferencia Magistral Este 27 de Setiembre, a las 2: p.m. INGRESO LIBRE El hombre que ha sacado de la pobreza a mas de 120 millones de personas en el mundo a traves del microcredito. Dr. Muhammad Yunus Premio Nobel de la Paz 2006 Lugar: Plaza Comercial Plaza Norte (Cruce Pamericana Norte y Tomas Valle) Hora: 2:00 p.m. ENTRADA LIBRE Separa un Stand para exhibir tus productos o servicios con anticipacion Organiza: Centro Global para el Desarrollo y a Democracia Inscribete en: Web: http://www.cgdd.org Telf: 721-2793 conferenciayu...@cgdd.org mailto:conferenciayu...@cgdd.org - r e t i r a r : quitarmedelab...@yahoo.es mailto:quitarmedelab...@yahoo.es -- To unsubscribe from this list visit http://hpusb.info/lists/?p=unsubscribeuid=4ab9d754892522ea10bc20d463d089e1 To update your preferences visit http://hpusb.info/lists/?p=preferencesuid=4ab9d754892522ea10bc20d463d089e1 --
ibm 380d pcic irqs
Why does OpenBSD 4.7 i386 assign the pcic irq to 4 which is the com0 isa port irq? Also, if there is a pcmcia card in a slot during boot that card gets irq 3 which is the com1 isa port irq. Later in the boot when com0 and com1 are detected dmesg shows: com0: irq 4 already in use com1: irq 3 already in use irq 9, 10, 11, etc. are free and the bios is set correctly. Any way to fix or get around this? I need both com ports so I do not want to disable them. (FreeBSD works perfect on same machine.) Machine is an old IBM 380D ThinkPad laptop. OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #558: Wed Mar 17 20:46:15 MDT 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium (P54C) (GenuineIntel 586-class) 153 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8 real mem = 83456000 (79MB) avail mem = 71454720 (68MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 03/28/97, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd960 apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: battery life expectancy 100% apm0: AC on, battery charge high pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd9a0/0x800 pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 2 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 15 pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:01:0 (Intel 82371 ISA and IDE rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #0 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor) cpu0: F00F bug workaround installed pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82437 PCI/Cache/DRAM rev 0x02 pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82371 ISA and IDE rev 0x03 vga1 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Neomagic Magicgraph 128ZV rev 0x02 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) pcic3 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 Cirrus Logic CL-PD6729 rev 0x07 pcic3 controller 0: Cirrus PD672X has sockets A and B pcmcia0 at pcic3 controller 0 socket 0 sm1 at pcmcia0 function 0 Megahertz, CC10BT/2, PCMCIA 10BASE-T/2 ETHERNET ADAPTER port 0x400/16, irq 3: address 50:00:b6:11:95:f7 pcmcia1 at pcic3 controller 0 socket 1 pcic3: interrupting at irq 4 pcic3: irq 4, polling enabled isa0 at pcib0 isadma0 at isa0 com0: irq 4 already in use com1: irq 3 already in use pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot) pckbc0: using irq 12 for aux slot wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0 wdc0 at isa0 port 0x1f0/8 irq 14 wd0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 0: IBM-DMCA-21440 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 1376MB, 2818368 sectors atapiscsi0 at wdc0 channel 0 drive 1 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TEAC, CD-38E, 2.0A ATAPI 5/cdrom removable wd0(wdc0:0:0): using BIOS timings cd0(wdc0:0:1): using BIOS timings sb0 at isa0 port 0x220/24 irq 5 drq 1: dsp v3.02 midi0 at sb0: SB MIDI UART audio0 at sb0 opl0 at sb0: model OPL3 midi1 at opl0: SB Yamaha OPL3 wss0 at isa0 port 0x530/8 irq 10 drq 0: CS4236/CS4236B (vers 63) audio1 at wss0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi2 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 lpt0 at isa0 port 0x378/4 irq 7 npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16 fdc0 at isa0 port 0x3f0/6 irq 6 drq 2 fd0 at fdc0 drive 0: 1.44MB 80 cyl, 2 head, 18 sec biomask eb45 netmask eb4d ttymask fbdf vscsi0 at root scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets softraid0 at root root on wd0a swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
4.7 smtpd 500 Pipelining unsupported
I have a fairly generic configuration for smtpd accepting mail on an
IPv6 interface. In the following email attempts, I'm seeing a 500
error from smtpd. The entry in /var/log/maillog is:
Sep 24 16:04:35 mail smtpd[9272]: 1285362275.rTy5IAatxEJ1PUGX:
from=i...@example.org, relay=blog.example.net [IPv6:2001:x:y::25],
stat=LocalError (500 Pipelining unsupported)
The SMTP conversation looks as such:
220 mail.ipv6.example.org ESMTP OpenSMTPD
EHLO ipv6.example.org
250-mail.ipv6.example.org Hello ipv6.example.net [IPv6:2001:x:y::25],
pleased to meet you
250-8BITMIME
250 HELP
MAIL FROM: i...@example.net
250 Sender ok
RCPT TO: al...@ipv6.example.org
250 Recipient ok
DATA
354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself
To:
From: i...@example.net
Message-ID: 4c9d12631b29a.1285362...@ipv6.example.net
Subject: Test Message
Date: Fri, 24 September 2010 14:04:35 -0700
Hello
.
QUIT
500 Pipelining unsupported
Here's my /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
listen on ::1 port 25
listen on 10.10.10.10 port 25
listen on 2001:h:h::5 port 25
hostname mail.ipv6.example.org
map aliases { source db /etc/mail/aliases.db }
map virtual { source db /etc/mail/virtual.db }
accept from all for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept from all for domain ipv6.example.org deliver to mbox
accept for all relay
The aliases.db file is generic as shipped, and the virtual.db table
looks as such:
# cat /etc/mail/virtual
al...@ipv6.example.org: alice
t...@ipv6.example.org: alice
And a /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #112: Wed Mar 17 20:43:49 MDT 2010
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 267321344 (254MB)
avail mem = 247496704 (236MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xfbd3f (10 entries)
bios0: vendor QEMU version QEMU date 01/01/2007
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC
acpi0: wakeup devices
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0
mpbios at bios0 not configured
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1, 2400.48 MHz
cpu0: FPU,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH
,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,NXE,LONG
cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 512KB 64b/line 1
6-way L2 cache
cpu0: ITLB 255 4KB entries direct-mapped, 255 4MB entries direct-mapped
cpu0: DTLB 255 4KB entries direct-mapped, 255 4MB entries direct-mapped
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82441FX rev 0x02
pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82371SB ISA rev 0x00
pciide0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 Intel 82371SB IDE rev 0x00: DMA, channel 0 wi
red to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: QEMU HARDDISK
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 5632MB, 11534336 sectors
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 0.9. ATAPI 5/cdrom removable
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 0, DMA mode 2
cd0(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 0
atapiscsi1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus1 at atapiscsi1: 2 targets
cd1 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 0.9. ATAPI 5/cdrom removable
cd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 0
uhci0 at pci0 dev 1 function 2 Intel 82371SB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
piixpm0 at pci0 dev 1 function 3 Intel 82371AB Power rev 0x03: irq 10
iic0 at piixpm0
iic0: addr 0x18 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words 00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x1a 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words 00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x29 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words 00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x2b 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words 00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x48 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x49 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x4a 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x4b 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x4c 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 48=00 word
s 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x4d 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04=
05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x4e 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 48=00 word
s 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Cirrus Logic CL-GD5446 rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
em0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM) rev 0x03:
Re: 4.7 smtpd 500 Pipelining unsupported
As indicated, pipelining isn't (yet) supported. See
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2920, specifically:
3. The Pipelining Service Extension
When a client SMTP wishes to employ command pipelining, it first
issues the EHLO command to the server SMTP. If the server SMTP
responds with code 250 to the EHLO command, and the response includes
the EHLO keyword value PIPELINING, then the server SMTP has indicated
that it can accommodate SMTP command pipelining.
Ideally the sender would obey this, but many assume pipelining support
is present and do not check.
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 04:53:39PM -0500, Mr. Roboto wrote:
I have a fairly generic configuration for smtpd accepting mail on an
IPv6 interface. In the following email attempts, I'm seeing a 500
error from smtpd. The entry in /var/log/maillog is:
Sep 24 16:04:35 mail smtpd[9272]: 1285362275.rTy5IAatxEJ1PUGX:
from=i...@example.org, relay=blog.example.net [IPv6:2001:x:y::25],
stat=LocalError (500 Pipelining unsupported)
The SMTP conversation looks as such:
220 mail.ipv6.example.org ESMTP OpenSMTPD
EHLO ipv6.example.org
250-mail.ipv6.example.org Hello ipv6.example.net [IPv6:2001:x:y::25],
pleased to meet you
250-8BITMIME
250 HELP
MAIL FROM: i...@example.net
250 Sender ok
RCPT TO: al...@ipv6.example.org
250 Recipient ok
DATA
354 Enter mail, end with . on a line by itself
To:
From: i...@example.net
Message-ID: 4c9d12631b29a.1285362...@ipv6.example.net
Subject: Test Message
Date: Fri, 24 September 2010 14:04:35 -0700
Hello
.
QUIT
500 Pipelining unsupported
Here's my /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
listen on ::1 port 25
listen on 10.10.10.10 port 25
listen on 2001:h:h::5 port 25
hostname mail.ipv6.example.org
map aliases { source db /etc/mail/aliases.db }
map virtual { source db /etc/mail/virtual.db }
accept from all for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept from all for domain ipv6.example.org deliver to mbox
accept for all relay
The aliases.db file is generic as shipped, and the virtual.db table
looks as such:
# cat /etc/mail/virtual
al...@ipv6.example.org: alice
t...@ipv6.example.org: alice
And a /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #112: Wed Mar 17 20:43:49 MDT 2010
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
real mem = 267321344 (254MB)
avail mem = 247496704 (236MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xfbd3f (10 entries)
bios0: vendor QEMU version QEMU date 01/01/2007
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC
acpi0: wakeup devices
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0
mpbios at bios0 not configured
cpu0 at mainbus0: (uniprocessor)
cpu0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1, 2400.48 MHz
cpu0:
FPU,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH
,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SSE3,NXE,LONG
cpu0: 64KB 64b/line 2-way I-cache, 64KB 64b/line 2-way D-cache, 512KB
64b/line 1
6-way L2 cache
cpu0: ITLB 255 4KB entries direct-mapped, 255 4MB entries direct-mapped
cpu0: DTLB 255 4KB entries direct-mapped, 255 4MB entries direct-mapped
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82441FX rev 0x02
pcib0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 82371SB ISA rev 0x00
pciide0 at pci0 dev 1 function 1 Intel 82371SB IDE rev 0x00: DMA, channel 0
wi
red to compatibility, channel 1 wired to compatibility
wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0: QEMU HARDDISK
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 5632MB, 11534336 sectors
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 1
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 0.9. ATAPI 5/cdrom
removable
wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 0, DMA mode 2
cd0(pciide0:0:1): using PIO mode 0
atapiscsi1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0
scsibus1 at atapiscsi1: 2 targets
cd1 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: QEMU, QEMU DVD-ROM, 0.9. ATAPI 5/cdrom
removable
cd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 0
uhci0 at pci0 dev 1 function 2 Intel 82371SB USB rev 0x01: irq 11
piixpm0 at pci0 dev 1 function 3 Intel 82371AB Power rev 0x03: irq 10
iic0 at piixpm0
iic0: addr 0x18 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words
00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x1a 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words
00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x29 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words
00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x2b 00=00 01=00 02=00 03=00 04=00 05=00 06=00 07=00 08=00 words
00=0
000 01= 02= 03= 04= 05= 06= 07=
iic0: addr 0x48 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05=
06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x49 48=00 words 00= 01= 02= 03= 04= 05=
06=0
000 07=
iic0: addr 0x4a
Re: 4.7 smtpd 500 Pipelining unsupported
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 17:06, Darrin Chandler dwchand...@stilyagin.com wrote: As indicated, pipelining isn't (yet) supported. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2920, specifically: [..] Ideally the sender would obey this, but many assume pipelining support is present and do not check. Ah, I see. Thanks much.
Re: 4.7 smtpd 500 Pipelining unsupported
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010, Mr. Roboto wrote: [Sorry, I can't resist...] MAIL FROM: i...@example.net Syntax error: space after colon is invalid. RCPT TO: al...@ipv6.example.org Same here.
invitatie cursuri gratuite online
Cursuri Gratuite Salut , Ai primit o invitatie la Cursuri Gratuite ! - Iti poti alege singur timpul si ritmul de invatare; - Echipa de profesionisti; - Usor accesibil; - Forma de pregatire moderna; - GRATUIT ! Succes ! www.cursurigratuiteonline.ro Ai fost invitat pe Cursuri Gratuite. Copyright ) 2009 Cursuri Gratuite. Toate drepturile rezervate.
Re: Linux or OpenBSD
Indeed, I never said that you CANT do it on OpenBSD,... I just mentioned how I do it... That said though the snort+PF combo though is two tools to do the job where I only need on in the wee Linux distro that I (roll myself) use for firewalls. Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:51 PM, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote: You can to filter layer 7 with snort By example, detect bittorrent and p2p traffic with snort and drop it 2010/9/24 Ross Cameron ross.came...@unix.net Depends what you want to do exactly I suppose... Personally I use Linux based firewalls for many of my sites purely because the clients in question want deep packet inspection (aka OSI layer 7 filtering) done on the network traffic. But that said they are always the second skin firewalls, sitting behind PF firewalls, filtering outbound traffic while the OpenBSD/FreeBSD boxen filter inbound traffic. Thats just my 5c worth and I've always been of the opinion that at least two different skins of firewalls should be deployed, build ontop of different technologies. Makes life a lot harder for whomever you want to keep out. Opportunity is most often missed by people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. Thomas Alva Edison Inventor of 1093 patents, including: The light bulb, phonogram and motion pictures. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Rikky Taylor rikkytay...@hotmail.co.uk wrote: I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3 interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules. Given identical modern server hardware would I expect a performance difference between an OpenBSD/PF setup and a Linux/IPTables one? Rikky
Re: gcc4 cross-tools
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:58:51PM -0500, Dale Rahn wrote: On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:37:59PM +0900, Hitoshi NAKAMORI wrote: HI all, I run make obj and try to make cross-tools again. looks a variable errors are caused same factor. every target failed in generating _muldi3.o from libgcc2.c. for example, in sparc64 target, last command which cause error occured is follow. [snip] I have posted a diff to fix most of the gcc4 cross compile issues on tech@ There is one remaining problem for i386 host, amd64 target that remains /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc/../../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.h:153: error: no data ty pe for mode 'TI' /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/libgcc/../../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.h:154: error: no data ty pe for mode 'TI' If anyone wants to look into that specific problem, feel free. But that diff should get most cross builds working succesfully. Dale Rahn dr...@dalerahn.com
