Re: Status of filter-spf

2024-01-29 Thread Kirill A . Korinsky
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:55:07 +0100,
Martijn van Duren wrote:
> 
> I've started filter-spf, but never gotten to finish it. No clue when
> or if I want to continue with it. At the moment my priorities are
> somewhere else.
> 

Got it.

Meanwhile I've discovered spfwalk.c which should speed up my work dramatically.

-- 
wbr, Kirill



Re: Status of filter-spf

2024-01-29 Thread Martijn van Duren
I've started filter-spf, but never gotten to finish it. No clue when
or if I want to continue with it. At the moment my priorities are
somewhere else.

martijn@

On Sun, 2024-01-28 at 14:04 +0100, Kirill A.Korinsky wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> This list seems as the right place to discuss
> about http://imperialat.at/dev/filter-spf
> 
> So, here I'm asking about the status of this project.
> 
> As far as I can see it has only one import to svn from some code.
> 
> I've read that code and I doubt that it can be compiled.
> 
> Does anyone know how far away it from ready to use filter?
> 
> I have an idea to make a filter-auth on reusing a filter-dkimverify and
> filter-spf to produce one nice header with result of authication.
> 
> If it works, moving future to timplement DMARC as OpenSMTPd filters won't be
> such a big deal :)
> 
> Anyway, SPF in term of DNS resolution with all that include:, a:, ptr: and so 
> on
> is quite large, and I'd like to avoid implementing it from scratch to avoid 
> tons
> of bugs.
> 
> And before I jump into that black hole, I'd like to guess how deep it is.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> --
> wbr, Kirill
>