WSJ: Obamacare - a Big Labor Trojan Horse

2009-09-11 Thread Fred B. Ellison
 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203440104574400571702189240.html 
 
 
Read the Union Health-Care Label 
Get ready for Detroit-style labor relations in our hospitals.
By MARK MIX 




In the heated debates on health-care reform, not enough attention is being paid 
to the huge financial windfalls ObamaCare will dole out to unions—or to the 
provisions in the various bills in Congress that will help bring about the 
forced unionization of the health-care industry. 
 
Tucked away in thousands of pages of complex new rules, regulations and 
mandates are special privileges and giveaways that could have devastating 
consequences for the health-care sector and the American economy at large.
 
The Senate version opens the door to implement forced unionization schemes 
pursued by former Govs. Rod Blagojevich of Illinois in 2005 and Gray Davis of 
California in 1999. Both men repaid tremendous political debts to Andy Stern 
and his Service Employees International Union (SEIU) by reclassifying 
state-reimbursed in-home health-care (and child-care) contractors as state 
employees—and forcing them to pay union dues. 
Following this playbook, the Senate bill creates a personal care attendants 
workforce advisory panel that will likely impose union affiliation to qualify 
for a newly created community living assistance services and support (class) 
reimbursement plan.
 
The current House version of ObamaCare (H.R. 3200) goes much further. Section 
225(A) grants Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius 
tremendous discretionary authority to regulate health-care workers under the 
public health insurance option. Monopoly bargaining and compulsory union dues 
may quickly become a required standard resulting in potentially hundreds of 
thousands of doctors and nurses across the country being forced into unions.
 
Ms. Sebelius will be taking her marching orders from the numerous union 
officials who are guaranteed seats on the various federal panels (such as the 
personal care panel mentioned above) charged with recommending health-care 
policies. Big Labor will play a central role in directing federal health-care 
policy affecting hundreds of thousands of doctors, surgeons and nurses.
 
Consider Kaiser Permanente, the giant, managed-care organization that has since 
1997 proudly touted its labor-management partnership in scores of workplaces. 
Union officials play an essentially co-equal role in running many Kaiser 
facilities. AFL-CIO President John Sweeney called the Kaiser plan a framework 
for what every health care delivery system should do at a July 24 health-care 
forum outside of Washington, D.C.
 
The House bill has a $10 billion provision to bail out insolvent union 
health-care plans. It also creates a lucrative professional-development grant 
program for health-care workers that effectively blackballs nonunion medical 
facilities from participation. The training funds in this program must be 
administered jointly with a labor organization—a scenario not unlike the U.S. 
Department of Labor's grants for construction apprenticeship programs, which 
have turned into a cash cow for construction industry union officials on the 
order of hundreds of millions of dollars each year.
 
There's more. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus has suggested that 
the federal government could pay for health-care reform by taxing American 
workers' existing health-care benefits—but he would exempt union-negotiated 
health-care plans. Under Mr. Baucus's scheme, the government could impose costs 
of up to $20,000 per employee on nonunion businesses already struggling to 
afford health care plans.
 
Mr. Baucus's proposal would give union officials another tool to pressure 
employers into turning over their employees to Big Labor. Rather than provide 
the lavish benefits required by Obamacare, employers could allow a union to 
come in and negotiate less costly benefits than would otherwise be required. 
Such plans could be continuously exempted.
Americans are unlikely to support granting unions more power than they already 
have in the health-care field. History shows union bosses could abuse their 
power to shut down medical facilities with sick-outs and strikes; force 
doctors, nurses and in-home care providers to abandon their patients; dictate 
terms and conditions of employment; and impose a failed, Detroit-style 
management model on the entire health-care field.
ObamaCare is a Trojan Horse for more forced unionization.



Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to 
take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic 
purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and 
sacrifice for that freedom. - John F. Kennedy

Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, 
or the dictates of our passion, 

Re: WSJ: Obamacare - a Big Labor Trojan Horse

2009-09-11 Thread larmelton3
Fred.
Tell us what is going on and what you and Janice are doing.
 Where you have been and where you are going next.
Tell us when you are comming home.
Larry Getting Worried Melton

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---