Re: [Mixxx-devel] Deciding when to cut for Alpha2/Beta

2014-11-15 Thread Max Linke
 A blocker for me are the memory leaks an the re-producible segfaults and
 other known party stoppers.
 I can have a look on the problems on Linux once EQ Rack is merged.
 Who will have a look on windows?

It can't be me this time sorry. I accepted a job in another city this week.
So with moving and everything the earliest when I have time to look at this is
sometime in January.


 A personal blocker for me is the missing non-chopped album art view for
 small screens.
 100 pixel width is simply to much. An I can't deal with the upper
 snipped :-/
 @Max, @Cardinot  You have offered to work on it after merge. Do you make
 progress
 or should I jump in?

I had a look at this. It is horrible to do this this currently, you have to
change upwards of 30 files. The problem is to get this configurable the cover
delegate needs access to our config object. The only way to do this currently
is to pass it that pointer in the construction, this means that EVERY class
that subclasses BSTM and all classes using it have to be changed to accept a
the configpointer in their constructor. 

In 1.13 I want to replace the configpointer with the QSettings class. After
this is done the change is pretty trivial because QSettings is a singelton so
we don't need to pass the object through different classes.

We can't make the current configobject a singelton without bigger changes
either. Because we use the class one time to store our config and another to
store the keyboard configuration.

So I would like wait with this until 1.13. Reducing the width for everybody
would work here for me. Maybe we can find a compromise.

 
 Kind regards,
 
 Daniel
 
 
 
 
 
 Am 14.11.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Owen Williams:
  We've been making really good progress recently (hurray covers!), and I
  want to get a feel for what other people think about the current status
  of the build as well as put some pressure behind a beta release.  To
  that end, at some regular interval, maybe every two weeks, I'll send an
  email to the list asking Why not now?  The idea being, the devs should
  provide a list of the fixes/features/work that they think are preventing
  a beta release.  
 
  For myself, I'd say my only major blocker is that the Deere skin needs
  to be cleaned up.  Max and I had talked about some things, and he
  mentioned some manual work that needs to be done.  I need to flesh out
  the bits about master sync, the midi wizard, and the new skin system for
  example.
 
  The problem with this tactic is that I've been sitting around waiting
  for someone to pick up the Deere skin work.  That creates a conflict
  between me thinking the skin needs fixing for the release, but nobody is
  doing it.  So my controversial addition to this plan is: if you think
  something is a blocker, you do the work on it :).  If you think someone
  else's PR needs to get finished, I think it's time to just pick it up
  and finish it.  So this weekend I will start poking at Deere, removing
  all the crazy background colors and cleaning it up.
 
  (There has been some hesitation releasing a beta because a beta should
  be releasable as a proper major version if it goes well. I actually
  disagree, since that's what I'd call a release candidate.  But if we
  want to call the next release an alpha2 that's ok with me.)
 
  So like I said, here are my blockers:
 
  * Deere skin work
  * Manual updates
 
  So, why not now?
 
 
  --
  Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
  Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
  Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
  Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
  http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
  ___
  Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
  http://mixxx.org
 
 
  Mixxx-devel mailing list
  Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
 
 
 --
 Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
 Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
 Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
 Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
 http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
 ___
 Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
 http://mixxx.org
 
 
 Mixxx-devel mailing list
 Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel


--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Deciding when to cut for Alpha2/Beta

2014-11-15 Thread Owen Williams
(I am much more open to adding a knob for dedicated deck effect than I
am to variable number of eq knobs)

On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 12:37 +1300, Waylon Robertson wrote:
 And what of 3 band with mid eq sweep?
 
 On Sunday, November 16, 2014, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
 I'm also wouldn't like 4 Band EQ's. 3 Band EQ's for the Decks
 are enough. If you
 want more bands on a EQ you can use the effects Framework.
 
 
 On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:06:31 -0500
 Owen Williams owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
 
  For the record, I disagree strongly with 4+ band EQs for
 decks.
  Emphatically.  It's a ton more work for skin designers to
 have to deal
  with some hypothetical variable number of eq knobs.  Show me
 just one
  midi controller with 4 labeled EQ knobs.
 
  The only place I've seen 4 knobs is on the high-end Xone 92,
 and I've
  heard more than one DJ complain about it.
 
 
  On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 21:23 -0800, Philip Whelan wrote:
   I don't think anyone disagrees with 4+ Band EQ's but it's
 going to be
   too much work for the next release.
  
   On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Waylon Robertson
   wrobertson1...@gmail.com wrote:
   depending on the track. And why does eq's have to
 be three
   bands? why can't someone skin a four band eq? or
 make it
   replicatable like the decks are?
   anyway, the standard mixer has high pass filter
 button to cut
   out everything below 80hz, low, mid, mid's freq
 sweep to allow
   mid to target a particular frequency range, and
 high.
   four band has hpf, low, low mid, low mid sweep
 freq, high mid,
   hi mid freq sweep, high.
  
   On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Owen Williams
   owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
   but deck EQs have to be three bands to
 work with the
   skins.
  
   When do you decide to change the EQs for
 more precise
   cuts?  On a
   track-by-track basis?  I can't imagine a
 DJ actually
   doing this during a
   set.
  
  
   On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 17:17 +1300, Waylon
 Robertson
   wrote:
a for instance might be, if you want to
 make use of
   a 4 band eq on one
deck, for more precise cuts, but a 3
 band eq on
   another deck will do
fine.
four deck: low, low mid, high mid, high
three: low, mid, high
of course, what if you want to control
 the
   frequencies of each eq
band? some mixers have a freq knob
 linked to low mid
   and high mid's,
or just mid... freq sweep?
and what of this thing i have heard
 about, but know
   nothing about, Q?
what is Q?
   
   
   
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Owen
 Williams
   owilli...@mixxx.org
wrote:
What is the use-case of having
 different EQs
   per deck?
   
   
   
   
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 23:29
 +0100, Daniel
   Schürmann wrote:
 Hi Owen,
  Is there any chance of
 having it be
   switchable from the
old style to the new
  style, or does that miss the
 point
   entirely?

 There is no reason to make it
 switchable,
   because there will
no big
 differences for the normal
 user.
 They are:
 * selectable EQ per deck
 

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Deciding when to cut for Alpha2/Beta

2014-11-15 Thread RJ Ryan
Yea, a Quick Effect slot that is just a super knob and effect selector is a
good general 1-knob solution for what the filter knob typically is on
certain controllers.

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Owen Williams owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:

 (I am much more open to adding a knob for dedicated deck effect than I
 am to variable number of eq knobs)

 On Sun, 2014-11-16 at 12:37 +1300, Waylon Robertson wrote:
  And what of 3 band with mid eq sweep?
 
  On Sunday, November 16, 2014, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
  I'm also wouldn't like 4 Band EQ's. 3 Band EQ's for the Decks
  are enough. If you
  want more bands on a EQ you can use the effects Framework.
 
 
  On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:06:31 -0500
  Owen Williams owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
 
   For the record, I disagree strongly with 4+ band EQs for
  decks.
   Emphatically.  It's a ton more work for skin designers to
  have to deal
   with some hypothetical variable number of eq knobs.  Show me
  just one
   midi controller with 4 labeled EQ knobs.
  
   The only place I've seen 4 knobs is on the high-end Xone 92,
  and I've
   heard more than one DJ complain about it.
  
  
   On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 21:23 -0800, Philip Whelan wrote:
I don't think anyone disagrees with 4+ Band EQ's but it's
  going to be
too much work for the next release.
   
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Waylon Robertson
wrobertson1...@gmail.com wrote:
depending on the track. And why does eq's have to
  be three
bands? why can't someone skin a four band eq? or
  make it
replicatable like the decks are?
anyway, the standard mixer has high pass filter
  button to cut
out everything below 80hz, low, mid, mid's freq
  sweep to allow
mid to target a particular frequency range, and
  high.
four band has hpf, low, low mid, low mid sweep
  freq, high mid,
hi mid freq sweep, high.
   
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Owen Williams
owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
but deck EQs have to be three bands to
  work with the
skins.
   
When do you decide to change the EQs for
  more precise
cuts?  On a
track-by-track basis?  I can't imagine a
  DJ actually
doing this during a
set.
   
   
On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 17:17 +1300, Waylon
  Robertson
wrote:
 a for instance might be, if you want to
  make use of
a 4 band eq on one
 deck, for more precise cuts, but a 3
  band eq on
another deck will do
 fine.
 four deck: low, low mid, high mid, high
 three: low, mid, high
 of course, what if you want to control
  the
frequencies of each eq
 band? some mixers have a freq knob
  linked to low mid
and high mid's,
 or just mid... freq sweep?
 and what of this thing i have heard
  about, but know
nothing about, Q?
 what is Q?



 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Owen
  Williams
owilli...@mixxx.org
 wrote:
 What is the use-case of having
  different EQs
per deck?




 On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 23:29
  +0100, Daniel
Schürmann wrote:
  Hi Owen,
   Is there any chance of
  having it be
switchable from the
 old style to the new
   style, or does that miss the
  point
entirely?
 
  There is no reason to make 

Re: [Mixxx-devel] I lost my pass word

2014-11-15 Thread bzk0711
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:46:40 -0600
Talibdin Shakir tyedinsela...@gmail.com wrote:

 Please send me a pass word reset link

Visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel
and use the bottom-most textbox Unsubscribe or edit
options.

-- 
Patric Schmitz bzk0...@aol.com

--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
___
Get Mixxx, the #1 Free MP3 DJ Mixing software Today
http://mixxx.org


Mixxx-devel mailing list
Mixxx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mixxx-devel