Re: [mkgmap-dev] Clarification regarding --make-cycleways
Sure, I already use --make-opposite-cycleways. Just wondering if --make-cycleways was still needed because I got confused reading some old emails here. Thanks again. Lorenzo Il giorno lun, 16/04/2018 alle 17.44 +, Gerd Petermann ha scritto: > Hi Lorenzo, > > there is no more code that evaluates the option, so it is completely ignored. > Maybe interesting: > --make-all-cycleways is still translated to --make-opposite-cycleways > > Gerd > > > Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von > Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi > Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2018 19:33:34 > An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Clarification regarding --make-cycleways > > Just a little clarification: > Is --make-cycleways option completely ignored or still evaluated for some use? > > Thanks > Lorenzo > ___ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] Clarification regarding --make-cycleways
Hi Lorenzo, there is no more code that evaluates the option, so it is completely ignored. Maybe interesting: --make-all-cycleways is still translated to --make-opposite-cycleways Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Lorenzo Mastrogiacomi Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2018 19:33:34 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Clarification regarding --make-cycleways Just a little clarification: Is --make-cycleways option completely ignored or still evaluated for some use? Thanks Lorenzo ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Clarification regarding --make-cycleways
Just a little clarification: Is --make-cycleways option completely ignored or still evaluated for some use? Thanks Lorenzo___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] area size in r4160
Hi I've executed the tests with the patched version a few times and it found no more errors, so I think you should commit it. This is now committed as r4165 which everyone affected by the issue should update to. Steve ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
[mkgmap-dev] Commit r4165: Fix for expression bug introduced in r4158
Version mkgmap-r4165 was committed by steve on Mon, 16 Apr 2018 Fix for expression bug introduced in r4158 r4158 was itself an expression fix, but introduced its own problems. There was also a bug that no one noticed involving double negation expressions eg: "!!(a<3)" that was introduced separately. http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/websvn/revision.php?repname=mkgmap&rev=4165 ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] area size in r4160
Hi Steve,
you are right, I ran the test without the patch. Sorry for the noise.
Seems I mixed branch and trunk versions :-(
I've executed the tests with the patched version a few times and it found no
more
errors, so I think you should commit it.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Steve
Ratcliffe
Gesendet: Montag, 16. April 2018 11:48:47
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] area size in r4160
Hi Gerd
> thanks, tried it with expr4.patch and option --rand and got some errors:
>
> ERROR: Syntax: $b~2 & length()>=1 {name 'n195'} [0x2]
>Message: Error: (lines:1): Expression cannot be indexed
This rule works for me on the patched code base, and fails
on trunk. Could you check you are running with the patch.
When running with --rand, there will be a "Seed was 1523871038110" at
the end of the status line that is printed. If you save
that value then we can reproduce the test run with --seed 1523871038110
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Re: [mkgmap-dev] area size in r4160
Hi Gerd
thanks, tried it with expr4.patch and option --rand and got some errors:
ERROR: Syntax: $b~2 & length()>=1 {name 'n195'} [0x2]
Message: Error: (lines:1): Expression cannot be indexed
This rule works for me on the patched code base, and fails
on trunk. Could you check you are running with the patch.
When running with --rand, there will be a "Seed was 1523871038110" at
the end of the status line that is printed. If you save
that value then we can reproduce the test run with --seed 1523871038110
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
