[mlpack] GSOC-2020 | Idea Proposal | Image Generation Modules

2020-03-15 Thread rakesh acharya
Hello Marcus/Ryan,

I'm Rakesh Acharya , I wish to contribute to* mlpack library* by developing
the *Image Generation* modules.Presently mlpack has *GAN,WGAN*.Many latest
GAN models have disrupted the Image Generation field like BEGAN,Energy
Based GAN,Manifold Matching GAN,Probabilistic GAN.

 *Yann LeCun described it as “the most interesting idea in the last 10
years in Machine Learning”.  *

Among the existing models *BEGAN/I-BEGAN* outruns most of the
models,including Energy Based GANs.I hope it will be a good leap forward in
building mlpack Image Generation modules.

After my initial proposal* Marcus suggested me I-BEGAN* paper and after
giving a thorough reading came to a conclusion that , though it has problem
with disentagling factors  results obtained are *very good with  minimal
Wassertian Distance based losses* and *maxmized mutual information.*

*BEGAN :  *https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10717
*IBEGAN* : https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2018/6465949/

I'd like to hear from you guys *suggestions regarding adding these
modules to mlpack library* and growing the areas it can be used to *Image
Generation.*

Regards,

Rakesh Acharya .D

Computer Engineering,VIT Chennai
Deep Learning,Computer Vision,Digital Signal Processing
___
mlpack mailing list
mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack


[mlpack] GSOC proposal for Profiling for parallelism.

2020-03-15 Thread Param Mirani
Hello Marcus/Ryan,

I am Param Mirani and I want to contribute to MLpack by participating in
GSOC 2020 in Profiling for Parallelism project. I have made some pull
requests in trying to improve performance of the algorithms on multi-core
processors using OpenMP. I had an idea and wanted to know your view on the
same.

I wanted to work on following algorithms in the 12 week program based on my
knowledge of machine learning algorithms.

1)KNN

2)Decision Trees

3)Perceptron

4)Back-propagation

I expect these algorithms to have an excellent speed-up when they use
OpenMP.

However I feel we would have a difficulty in deciding which parts of the
algorithm based on various programs I write for benchmarking of these
algorithms. There are some more algorithms which could use OpenMP but
speed-up may not be that significant.

Along with these I would also like to understand 2-3 more algorithms and
work with them in a similar way.

I'd like to know if the timeline I've proposed is realistic, if all
assumptions are correct, and if there are any more algorithms that you
would like me to work on while working on this project.

Thanks,

Param Mirani.
___
mlpack mailing list
mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack


[mlpack] (no subject)

2020-03-15 Thread Aman Pandey
Hey Ryan/Marcus,
Are there any current coordinates to start with, in "Profiling for
Parallelization"?
I want to know if any, to avoid any redundant work.

Thanks
-- 

Aman Pandey
Webpage: https://johnsoncarl.github.io/aboutme/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/amnpandey/
___
mlpack mailing list
mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack