Thanks for the updated code Guilio! I'll have a look at it later on and get back to you.
I'm currently a bit absent from MochiKit-related work, but I'll be back in a month or two I hope. Like most other people lurking around here it seems that I'm working on one or two projects too many... :-) Cheers, /Per On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Giulio Cesare Solaroli <giulio.ces...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Per, > > I have been able to hack the SimpleTest.TestRunner code in order to be > "recursive", that is I can now have a TestRunner load other > TestRunners and not just SimpleTests as in the current code. > > I still have a strange problem with Firefox 3.08 where the number of > successful tests reported is sometimes wrong, but otherwise it works > fine. > > Attached you can find my updated version of TestRunner.js and > SimpleTest.js, in case anyone is interested. > > Regards, > > Giulio Cesare > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Giulio Cesare Solaroli > <giulio.ces...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Per, >> >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Per Cederberg <cederb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Interesting that you're using SimpleTest! It is on my not-so-secret >>> agenda for 1.5 to merge that into MochiKit.Test and create a public >>> API for JS testing. >> >> Interesting; but SimpleTest is quite fine for my current needs >> >> >>> To answer your question -- I think the tests/index.html file in the >>> MochiKit distribution does this. It might not be all that elegant >>> though. >> >> Nope. The tests/index.html files invoke the TestRunner.runTests method >> on a list of "regular" html test files. >> >> What I need is a way to create a tests/index.html test suite, that >> could include a call to (for example) tests/module1/index.html; where >> the later file is structured just like the former. >> >> >>> Be sure to let me know if you have any ideas regarding creating an >>> improved testing API. >> >> At the moment our testing needs are fulfilled by SimpleTest api. The >> only problem we have, is that sometimes tests fail silently, and if >> you don't know the correct number of expected tests, you may miss some >> errors. :-( >> >> But this is just an implementation issue. >> >> Regards, >> >> Giulio Cesare >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MochiKit" group. To post to this group, send email to mochikit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to mochikit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mochikit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
