cvs commit: modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl mod_perl.c

2002-04-05 Thread dougm

dougm   02/04/05 17:23:17

  Modified:src/modules/perl mod_perl.c
  Log:
  use AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE rather than AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.111 +2 -2  modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.c
  
  Index: mod_perl.c
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.110
  retrieving revision 1.111
  diff -u -r1.110 -r1.111
  --- mod_perl.c6 Apr 2002 01:19:15 -   1.110
  +++ mod_perl.c6 Apr 2002 01:23:17 -   1.111
   -504,11 +504,11 
   
   ap_register_output_filter(MP_FILTER_REQUEST_OUTPUT_NAME,
 modperl_output_filter_handler,
  -  AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET);
  +  AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
   
   ap_register_input_filter(MP_FILTER_REQUEST_INPUT_NAME,
modperl_input_filter_handler,
  - AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET);
  + AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
   
   ap_register_output_filter(MP_FILTER_CONNECTION_OUTPUT_NAME,
 modperl_output_filter_handler,
  
  
  



cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestDirective perlrequire.pm

2002-04-05 Thread dougm

dougm   02/04/05 17:42:53

  Modified:lib  .cvsignore
   lib/ModPerl Code.pm
   t/conf   modperl_extra.pl
   t/response/TestDirective perlrequire.pm
  Added:   lib  Apache2.pm
  Log:
  no longer generate Apache2.pm
  
  add an Apache2.pm that scans INC for Apache2/ directories rather than
  hardcode paths as the old generated one did.
  
  use Apache2 (); in the tests so t/TEST can run when built with
  MP_INST_APACHE2=1
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.2   +1 -1  modperl-2.0/lib/.cvsignore
  
  Index: .cvsignore
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/lib/.cvsignore,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.2
  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
  --- .cvsignore30 Apr 2000 03:34:00 -  1.1
  +++ .cvsignore6 Apr 2002 01:42:52 -   1.2
   -1 +1 
  -Apache2.pm
  +
  
  
  
  1.1  modperl-2.0/lib/Apache2.pm
  
  Index: Apache2.pm
  ===
  package Apache2;
  
  BEGIN {
  my dirs = ();
  
  for my $path (INC) {
  my $dir = $path/Apache2;
  next unless -d $dir;
  push dirs, $dir;
  }
  
  if (dirs) {
  unshift INC, dirs;
  }
  }
  
  1;
  
  
  
  
  1.76  +0 -29 modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl/Code.pm
  
  Index: Code.pm
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl/Code.pm,v
  retrieving revision 1.75
  retrieving revision 1.76
  diff -u -r1.75 -r1.76
  --- Code.pm   21 Feb 2002 01:45:34 -  1.75
  +++ Code.pm   6 Apr 2002 01:42:53 -   1.76
   -681,35 +681,6 
   #create bootstrap method for static xs modules
   my $static_xs = [keys %{ $build-{XS} }];
   ExtUtils::Embed::xsinit($xsinit, 1, $static_xs);
  -
  -warn generating..., $self-generate_apache2_pm, \n;
  -}
  -
  -sub generate_apache2_pm {
  -my $self = shift;
  -
  -my $lib = $self-perl_config('installsitelib');
  -my $arch = $self-perl_config('installsitearch');
  -my $file = $self-default_file('apache2_pm');
  -
  -open my $fh, '', $file or die open $file: $!;
  -
  -my $package = 'package Apache2';
  -
  -print $fh noedit_warning_hash();
  -
  -print $fh EOF;
  -$package;
  -
  -use lib qw($lib/Apache2
  -   $arch/Apache2);
  -
  -1;
  -
  -EOF
  -close $fh;
  -
  -$file;
   }
   
   my $constant_prefixes = join '|', qw{APR?};
  
  
  
  1.13  +2 -0  modperl-2.0/t/conf/modperl_extra.pl
  
  Index: modperl_extra.pl
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/conf/modperl_extra.pl,v
  retrieving revision 1.12
  retrieving revision 1.13
  diff -u -r1.12 -r1.13
  --- modperl_extra.pl  8 Jan 2002 22:46:08 -   1.12
  +++ modperl_extra.pl  6 Apr 2002 01:42:53 -   1.13
   -1,3 +1,5 
  +use Apache2 ();
  +
   use ModPerl::Util (); #for CORE::GLOBAL::exit
   
   use Apache::RequestRec ();
  
  
  
  1.6   +1 -0  modperl-2.0/t/response/TestDirective/perlrequire.pm
  
  Index: perlrequire.pm
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/response/TestDirective/perlrequire.pm,v
  retrieving revision 1.5
  retrieving revision 1.6
  diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
  --- perlrequire.pm18 Jan 2002 06:57:32 -  1.5
  +++ perlrequire.pm6 Apr 2002 01:42:53 -   1.6
   -9,6 +9,7 
   use strict;
   use warnings FATAL = 'all';
   
  +use Apache2 ();
   use Apache::Test ();
   use Apache::Const -compile = 'OK';
   use File::Spec::Functions qw(catfile);
  
  
  



cvs commit: modperl-2.0 .cvsignore Makefile.PL

2002-04-05 Thread dougm

dougm   02/04/05 20:01:56

  Modified:..cvsignore Makefile.PL
  Log:
  generate MANIFEST during make dist
  
  Revision  ChangesPath
  1.6   +1 -0  modperl-2.0/.cvsignore
  
  Index: .cvsignore
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/.cvsignore,v
  retrieving revision 1.5
  retrieving revision 1.6
  diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
  --- .cvsignore6 Mar 2002 05:24:57 -   1.5
  +++ .cvsignore6 Apr 2002 04:01:56 -   1.6
   -5,3 +5,4 
   scraps
   diff.txt
   smoke-report-*.txt
  +MANIFEST
  
  
  
  1.61  +17 -2 modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL
  
  Index: Makefile.PL
  ===
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL,v
  retrieving revision 1.60
  retrieving revision 1.61
  diff -u -r1.60 -r1.61
  --- Makefile.PL   6 Apr 2002 02:12:14 -   1.60
  +++ Makefile.PL   6 Apr 2002 04:01:56 -   1.61
   -71,6 +71,9 
   clean = {
   FILES = { clean_files() },
   },
  +dist = {
  +DIST_DEFAULT = 'mydist',
  +},
   );
   
   post_configure();
   -209,7 +212,8 
   
   return [@{ $build-clean_files },
   xs/*.exp, xs/*.def,
  -  map { $path/$_} { $code-clean_files }];
  +qw(MANIFEST),
  +map { $path/$_} { $code-clean_files }];
   }
   
   sub set_modperl_version {
   -358,7 +362,9 
   }
   
   sub MY::postamble {
  -'';
  +return EOF;
  +mydist : manifest tardist
  +EOF
   }
   
   sub MY::tool_autosplit {
   -389,4 +395,13 
   \t.'PERL=$(PERL)\\',
   \t.'DEFINE=$(DEFINE)',
   ;
  +}
  +
  +sub MY::dist_basics {
  +my $self = shift;
  +my $str = $self-MM::dist_basics;
  +
  +$str =~ s/-MExtUtils(::Manifest=mkmanifest)/-Ilib -MModPerl$1/;
  +
  +$str;
   }
  
  
  



Re: Access right on files from CGI script

2002-04-05 Thread Issac Goldstand

I would say you should set up suexec to let the user that Apache runs as
execute those specific commands as a privaleged user. But use suexec
with EXTREME care.

Issac

bo wrote:

 Hello gurus,

 I am notivice on Apache configuration.
 I wrote a CGI program, which will display
 some system status on the client PC's browser window.

 This CGI program will execute a couple of system command
 under /sbin with reading some system status from /proc.

 I have no problem to access or execute any file or binary under
 /www/cgi-bin
 but I have an access problem to other system directories like /sbin or
 /proc.

 I followed the apache configuration document and I modified
 directory and
 created .htaccess file under /sbin but it did not help.

 How do I allow those files accessible from the CGI script?


 Please help me out.

 Thanks in advance,

 Bo







Thanks and GoodBye

2002-04-05 Thread John Kolvereid

Hi,
   Thanks for all your help, but I am NOT able to
install mod_perl.  It's probably something that is not
installed on my particular server - I'll never know. 
After spending several weeks (almost solid) tweaking
the configuration and trying various scenarios to no
avail I finally realized that there is no way for me
to figure out what is wrong.  It's not so bad,  I am
still able to do CGI programming w/ no problems.

   Enjoy, and thanks again for all your support.

John Kolvereid

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/



RE: Thanks and GoodBye

2002-04-05 Thread Nicolai Schlenzig (DXD)

Hi John,

I haven't been following your case in details but my oppinion is that if you have a 
clean install of any common Unix platform (or at least one mentioned in the mod_perl 
doc.) it should be no problem to install a default mod_perl enabled Apache.

From what I can see you use Redhat 6.2 which is _very_ common I guess. Personally I 
don't use anything but FreeBSD, and mod_perl has never caused my big problems. Most 
Unix distributions come out of the box well capable of installing mod_perl right 
away... to my knowledge.

That being said, I have had times when it didn't make all the output files needed for 
merging mod_perl into my httpd. But that has only been the case when I also wanted 
mod_php and mod_ssl in the same httpd.

So my suggestion is, that you either clean your current box and re-install from 
scratch (if it's not a production site), or try a clean install on a new test box if 
you have that available.

You should definately not give up. It's not hard at all.

Best of luck

// Nicolai


 -Original Message-
 From: John Kolvereid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 1:14 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Thanks and GoodBye
 
 
 Hi,
Thanks for all your help, but I am NOT able to
 install mod_perl.  It's probably something that is not
 installed on my particular server - I'll never know. 
 After spending several weeks (almost solid) tweaking
 the configuration and trying various scenarios to no
 avail I finally realized that there is no way for me
 to figure out what is wrong.  It's not so bad,  I am
 still able to do CGI programming w/ no problems.
 
Enjoy, and thanks again for all your support.
 
 John Kolvereid
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
 http://taxes.yahoo.com/
 



Re: Thanks and GoodBye

2002-04-05 Thread Geoffrey Young

John Kolvereid wrote:
 
 Hi,
Thanks for all your help, but I am NOT able to
 install mod_perl.  

don't give up, john. it's a hard road, especially for those just starting out, but it 
is
worth it :) 

I haven't read all of your thread in detail, but I would suggest that if you are really
having that much trouble that you take a few baby steps first and try a binary
distribution of mod_perl.

for instance, most linux distributions have pre-compiled binary packages for both 
Apache
and mod_perl (as a DSO) that work rather well out of the box.  Solaris also has a 
binary
mod_perl package.  and if you just want to start playing with mod_perl's features, I've
seen absolutely nothing easier than Randy's Win32 distribution of Perl/Apache/mod_perl
(which can be found at ftp://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/pub/other/perl-win32-bin-0.7.exe) - 
I
was simply amazed at how quickly I was able to install Randy's package and run stuff
immediately.

for instructions on installing the various binary packages, you can see chapter 1 of 
the
cookbook (http://www.modperlcookbook.org/chapters/ch01.pdf), as well as the valuable
information in the eagle book and guide that I'm sure you've looked over already.  in
particular, there's a section in the guide for installing redhat rpms which, though a 
bit
dated now, is still pretty accurate.

HTH

--Geoff



RE: Thanks and GoodBye

2002-04-05 Thread Jonathan M. Hollin

Thanks for all your help, but I am NOT able to
 install mod_perl.

John,

I don't know if anyone has mentioned this before, but have you tried the
Apache Toolbox (http://www.apachetoolbox.com/)?  Before you give up
completely it might be worth trying.


Jonathan M. Hollin - WYPUG Co-ordinator

West Yorkshire Perl User Group
http://wypug.pm.org/
http://wypug.digital-word.com/




AuthCookie login ?

2002-04-05 Thread Fran Fabrizio


Is there a hook in AuthCookie to allow me to run some code only right 
after successful login?  The model doesn't seem to allow for this.  The 
way it seems to work is you attempt to log in, if it doesn't find a 
valid cookie, it displays the login form again.  You submit that and it 
sets the cookie without authenticating the login, then issues a redirect 
to the page the user was originally trying to go to.  When the browser 
comes back via the redirect, the cookie is already present, and only 
then does AuthCookie attempt to authenticate the cookie.

Since the authentication happens on every trip into the server, and I 
don't want to run my code (to set up an Apache::Session for the user's 
session data) until I'm sure I have a valid user on my hands, I can't 
see a way to do the session setup only the first time after a sucessful 
login.  It would seem wasteful to check for the presence of the 
Apache::Session object every trip to the server just to determine if 
this is the first request or not.  Is there a hook or a flag with that 
same functionality?

Thanks,
Fran





Re: AuthCookie login ?

2002-04-05 Thread Geoffrey Young


 Since the authentication happens on every trip into the server, and I
 don't want to run my code (to set up an Apache::Session for the user's
 session data) until I'm sure I have a valid user on my hands, I can't
 see a way to do the session setup only the first time after a sucessful
 login.  

can't you do this in authen_cred()?  IIRC authen_cred is only called when no cookie is
found, which means you have a first time visit (or an unsuccessful attempt).  you have
control here to execute code only when a valid user is found, since it's up to you to
determine if the user is valid.  authen_ses_key() then checks whether the cookie itself
(containing the session key) is valid.

at least this is how I remember it working - it's been a while since I've worked with
AuthCookie.

--Geoff



Re: Thanks and GoodBye

2002-04-05 Thread Perrin Harkins

John Kolvereid wrote:
Thanks for all your help, but I am NOT able to
 install mod_perl.  It's probably something that is not
 installed on my particular server - I'll never know. 

I suspect you were just trying to do too much at once on your first try 
by throwing PHP and SSL in the mix.  I suggest you look at SpeedyCGI 
(http://daemoninc.com/speedycgi/), which offers similar speedups for CGI 
scripts but does not require you to recompile Apache.  It doesn't have 
the same feature set as mod_perl, but all you wanted to do was speed up 
your existing CGI scripts anyway.

- Perrin




the coming of Apache 2.0

2002-04-05 Thread Chuck Goehring





The modssl-userslist is all abuzz about the 
coming of Apache 2.0. I don't hear a lot on this list on mod_perl support 
for Apache 2.0. Is anyone planning to adopt this configuration in the near 
future?

Chuck


www.modperl.com .. ?

2002-04-05 Thread troutb

According to the subscription notice ...

 www.modperl.com is a resource site  but I've tried many times ...

is this site still valid?





mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread Rasoul Hajikhani

Hello folks,
Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
do you think of it? Is it a good buy? Appreciate feed back.
Thanks in advance
-r



Re: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread Fran Fabrizio


The cookbook is fabulous.  In my opinion it's much clearer than the 
Eagle book.  Of course it has the benefit of having been written when 
mod_perl had a few more years of maturity under it's belt. =)

The Cookbook is wonderful and I would also like to publicly thank 
Geoffrey Young, one of the authors, for the generous amounts of help he 
has provided me via email.

Buy it, you'll like it!

-Fran

Rasoul Hajikhani wrote:
 Hello folks,
 Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
 do you think of it? Is it a good buy? Appreciate feed back.
 Thanks in advance
 -r





Re: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread James G Smith

Rasoul Hajikhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
do you think of it? Is it a good buy? Appreciate feed back.
Thanks in advance

I enjoyed it -- I have it on my desk ready to crack open at a
moment's notice.  But then, I'm a bit biased since I'm mentioned in
it :)

It's been invaluable in writing some mod_perl handlers lately
(Uttu.pm - 0.02 next week, hopefully, much improved).

You'll want to either get the next print run or take a look at the
errata on www.modperlcookbook.org if you run into problems.  There
don't seem to be a lot of large, glaring problems, just small things
that can be easily overlooked.  A few sample chapters are also
available at that site.
-- 
James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], 979-862-3725
Texas AM CIS Operating Systems Group, Unix



Re: the coming of Apache 2.0

2002-04-05 Thread sterling

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Chuck Goehring wrote:

 The modssl-users list is all abuzz about the coming of Apache 2.0.  I 
 don't hear a lot on this list on mod_perl support for Apache 2.0.  Is 
 anyone planning to adopt this configuration in the near future?

http://perl.apache.org/~dougm/modperl_2.0.html

sterling




Re: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread Perrin Harkins

Rasoul Hajikhani wrote:
 Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
 do you think of it? Is it a good buy?

Yes.  Go get it.

- Perrin





Re: www.modperl.com .. ?

2002-04-05 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen

At 11:24 AM 4/5/02 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the subscription notice ...
  www.modperl.com is a resource site  but I've tried many times ...
is this site still valid?

Works fine from here...


Elizabeth Mattijsen




Re: www.modperl.com .. ?

2002-04-05 Thread Charles Albrecht

At 11:24 AM -0600 4/5/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the subscription notice ...

 www.modperl.com is a resource site  but I've tried many times ...

is this site still valid?

It redirects to http://modperl.com:9000/ which, if your connection 
lives behind a firewall, may be blocked.

-Charles
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Charles Albrecht  Euonymic Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   P.O. Box 300623
C303.619.7596  F978.334.3061   Denver, Colorado 80203-0623
http://www.euonymic.net/~charlesa/cv/



Pipelinning Output APP Framework

2002-04-05 Thread troutb

I know alot of you must do this.

I want build a simple APP framework to chain the output of all my content
handlers, which would live in many different PM's for easy code management.

for example:
APP::Header
APP::Footer
APP::Content
APP::Chemical_entry
APP::...
APP::Controller
- would push_handlers based on uri and/or app logic
- The result would be the entire html output in ( via print array )

WHY ( so that my content can: )

- pass named paired parameters to following handlers
- modify previous content ( eg update html header code with a msg from
main content handler )


Is any one doing something similar that could be used in a production
enviroment ?
- via memvory
- via tie ( the list messages seem to bash this approach )
- some other method


My goal is to develop an open source chemical tracking system.
The requirements are
-web based
-FAST
-DB session tracking
-FAST, FAST, FAST ( mod perl seems to be the best )
-perl
-FAST
-DBI
-FAST
-Postgres
-SSL





Re: Open3

2002-04-05 Thread Lupe Christoph

In local.modperl you write:

I have asked this question before, and received answers that have helped
me in quest. However, my problem persists. So I would like to direct
this question to those who have used gpg, and open3. I am having trouble
writing to stdin when an apache thread calls open3. However, the same
code written as a test script runs fine. I am using the --passphrase-fd
0 option which would instruct gpg to expect the passphrase from stdin
rather than keyboard. As I mentioned above, the problem arises when an
apache thread tries to execute my code. I know that under perl 5.6 it is
necessary to untie STDIN,... (thanks Don Hayward), but I am using perl 
5.005_03 built for irix ( Apache/1.3.12 Ben-SSL/1.39 (Unix)
mod_perl/1.22). What is happening that I am missing?

I'm vaguely remembering reading an article that said this is very
non-trivial, and that there is a module to help with the hard part.
Have you had a look at Crypt::GPG?

http://search.cpan.org/doc/AGUL/Crypt-GPG-1.28/GPG.pm

HTH,
Lupe Christoph
-- 
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |http://free.prohosting.com/~lupe |
| I have challenged the entire ISO-9000 quality assurance team to a  |
| Bat-Leth contest on the holodeck. They will not concern us again.  |
| http://public.logica.com/~stepneys/joke/klingon.htm|



sun4-solaris polluted installation

2002-04-05 Thread Slava Bizyayev

Hi everyone,

I have to (re)install mod_perl enabled Apache on prod server, which is
polluted with the several previous unsuccessful attempts to do the similar
job. It is not my server, but I may sudo su, when sure that the main prod
(which is running on pure Apache using perl CGI scripts) will remain
working... Basically, I need to clean up the mess and to install a brand new
mod_perl enabled dedicated Apache to use some of my handlers for the
performance demonstration. Actually, I need somebody very experienced with
the sun4-solaris environment to assist me carefully on this slippery road...

# perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 6 subversion 1) configuration:
  Platform:
osname=solaris, osvers=2.6, archname=sun4-solaris
uname='sunos tensor.vnet.net 5.6 generic_105181-06 sun4u sparc
sunw,ultra-1 '
config_args='-Dcc=gcc -de'
hint=recommended, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define
usethreads=undef use5005threads=undef useithreads=undef
usemultiplicity=undef
useperlio=undef d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef
use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef
  Compiler:
cc='gcc', ccflags
='-fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFS
ET_BITS=64',
optimize='-O',
cppflags='-fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include'
ccversion='', gccversion='2.95.3 20010315 (release)',
gccosandvers='solaris2.6'
intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321
d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=16
ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t',
lseeksize=8
alignbytes=8, usemymalloc=y, prototype=define
  Linker and Libraries:
ld='gcc', ldflags =' -L/usr/local/lib '
libpth=/usr/local/lib /usr/lib /usr/ccs/lib
libs=-lsocket -lnsl -lgdbm -ldb -ldl -lm -lc
perllibs=-lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lm -lc
libc=/lib/libc.so, so=so, useshrplib=false, libperl=libperl.a
  Dynamic Linking:
dlsrc=dl_dlopen.xs, dlext=so, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags=' '
cccdlflags='-fPIC', lddlflags='-G -L/usr/local/lib'

Characteristics of this binary (from libperl):
  Compile-time options: USE_LARGE_FILES
  Built under solaris
  Compiled at May 10 2001 06:56:03
  INC:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/sun4-solaris
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl



Libraries in initial conditions:

# ls -l /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/
total 1166
drwxr-xr-x   3 root other   1024 Mar 12 19:50 Apache
-r--r--r--   1 root other  35434 May  1  2001 Apache.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 B
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin16467 May 10  2001 B.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 root other512 Mar 12 19:50 Bundle
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin  603 May 10  2001 ByteLoader.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin 1024 Mar 12 19:36 CORE
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin   188975 May 10  2001 Config.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin57760 May 10  2001 DB_File.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 Data
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 Devel
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin27317 May 10  2001 DynaLoader.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 6953 May 10  2001 Errno.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 5216 May 10  2001 Fcntl.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 File
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 1930 May 10  2001 GDBM_File.pm
drwxr-xr-x   3 bin  bin  512 Mar 29 12:17 IO
-r--r--r--   1 root other742 Jul 23  1998 IO.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 IPC
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 2408 May 10  2001 NDBM_File.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 2651 May 10  2001 O.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 2406 May 10  2001 ODBM_File.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin15195 May 10  2001 Opcode.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin18796 May 10  2001 POSIX.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin50095 May 10  2001 POSIX.pod
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 2517 May 10  2001 SDBM_File.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin16668 May 10  2001 Safe.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin10564 May 10  2001 Socket.pm
drwxr-xr-x   2 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:36 Sys
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 3619 May 10  2001 XSLoader.pm
-r--r--r--   1 bin  bin 1432 May 10  2001 attrs.pm
drwxr-xr-x  25 bin  bin  512 Mar 12 19:50 auto
-r--r--r--   1 root other   3277 Mar  3  2000 cgi_to_mod_perl.pod
-r--r--r--   1 root other   1096 Jul 11  2001 mod_perl.pm
-r--r--r--   1 root other  27538 Nov 28  2000 mod_perl.pod
-r--r--r--   1 root other   2706 Feb 29  2000 mod_perl_cvs.pod
-r--r--r--   1 root other512 Mar 12 16:44 mod_perl_hooks.pm
-r--r--r--   1 root other

Re: Problem with DBM concurrent access

2002-04-05 Thread Dan Wilga

I would also suggest using BerkeleyDB.pm, but with the 
DB_INIT_MPOOL|DB_INIT_CDB flags. In this mode, only one writer is 
allowed at a time, and Berkeley automatically handles all the locking 
and flushing. Just don't forget to use db_close() to close the file 
before untie'ing it.


Dan Wilga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Technology Specialist http://www.mtholyoke.edu
Mount Holyoke CollegeTel: 413-538-3027
South Hadley, MA  01075   Who left the cake out in the rain?




Re: sun4-solaris polluted installation

2002-04-05 Thread Ged Haywood

Hi there,

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Slava Bizyayev wrote:

 I have to (re)install mod_perl enabled Apache on prod server, which
 is polluted with the several previous unsuccessful attempts [snip]
 Actually, I need somebody very experienced with the sun4-solaris
 environment to assist me carefully on this slippery road...

It's not that difficult.  You can build another Apache with mod_perl
and run it on the same machine without having any effect at all on the
existing server, which can continue to run as normal.  All you have to
do is to configure the new server to listen to a port other than port
80 (to which presumably your production server is currently listening)
and you can play with your new server until you get it to do what it
needs to do.

The details are all in the Guide:

http://perl.apache.org/guide

and you might also want to have a look at the Eagle Book:

Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C, ISBN 1-56592-567-X

and/or the Cookbook

http://www.modperlcookbook.org

if you haven't already.

73,
Ged.

(PS: GY: OK?)




Re: Pipelinning Output APP Framework

2002-04-05 Thread Chris Winters

On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 12:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I know alot of you must do this.
 
 I want build a simple APP framework to chain the output of all my content
 handlers, which would live in many different PM's for easy code management.
 
 for example:
 APP::Header
 APP::Footer
 APP::Content
 APP::Chemical_entry
 APP::...
 APP::Controller
 - would push_handlers based on uri and/or app logic
 - The result would be the entire html output in ( via print array )
 
 WHY ( so that my content can: )
 
 - pass named paired parameters to following handlers
 - modify previous content ( eg update html header code with a msg from
 main content handler )
 
 
 Is any one doing something similar that could be used in a production
 enviroment ?
 - via memvory
 - via tie ( the list messages seem to bash this approach )
 - some other method

You might look at OpenFrame, they're doing neat stuff with pipelines.
It's on CPAN and at http://openframe.fotango.com/

Chris

-- 
Chris Winters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Building enterprise-capable snack solutions since 1988.




Re: Pipelinning Output APP Framework

2002-04-05 Thread Perrin Harkins

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I know alot of you must do this.
 
 I want build a simple APP framework to chain the output of all my content
 handlers, which would live in many different PM's for easy code management.
 
 for example:
 APP::Header
 APP::Footer
 APP::Content
 APP::Chemical_entry
 APP::...
 APP::Controller
 - would push_handlers based on uri and/or app logic
 - The result would be the entire html output in ( via print array )
 
 WHY ( so that my content can: )
 
 - pass named paired parameters to following handlers
 - modify previous content ( eg update html header code with a msg from
 main content handler )

This is not the best way to think about the problem, especially if you 
want it to be FAST, FAST, FAST.  Having one piece of code manipulate 
the HTML output from another piece is messy, slow, and will probably 
break every time your designers change the HTML.  Instead, build a 
pipeline for working on the data to be displayed, which you can easilly 
pass through method arguments or $r-pnotes(), and then run a template 
(which may include many smaller templates) at the end to generate HTML. 
  There are several templating tools you can use for this, and I've 
summarized the best ones at http://perl.apache.org/features/tmpl-cmp.html.

- Perrin




Re: Problem with DBM concurrent access

2002-04-05 Thread Andrew Ho

Hello,

DWI would also suggest using BerkeleyDB.pm, but with the 
DWDB_INIT_MPOOL|DB_INIT_CDB flags. In this mode, only one writer is 
DWallowed at a time, and Berkeley automatically handles all the locking 
DWand flushing. Just don't forget to use db_close() to close the file 
DWbefore untie'ing it.

One caveat on this, BerkeleyDB maintains its locks and other environment
information in a local memory segment so this won't work if multiple
machines share the same BerkeleyDB file (e.g., you are using the
BerkeleyDB file over NFS).

Humbly,

Andrew

--
Andrew Ho   http://www.tellme.com/   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Voice 650-930-9062
Tellme Networks, Inc.   1-800-555-TELLFax 650-930-9101
--




Re: sun4-solaris polluted installation

2002-04-05 Thread Slava Bizyayev

Nice try. Unfortunately, helpless...
Don't you see two instances of mod_perl in common perl libraries? That's
just flowers...
When I try to make install, for example

# make install
Writing
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/auto/Apache/Filter/.packli
st
Appending installation info to
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/perllocal.pod

Funny? Not for me...

Best regards,
Slava



- Original Message -
From: Ged Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Re: sun4-solaris polluted installation


 Hi there,

 On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Slava Bizyayev wrote:

  I have to (re)install mod_perl enabled Apache on prod server, which
  is polluted with the several previous unsuccessful attempts [snip]
  Actually, I need somebody very experienced with the sun4-solaris
  environment to assist me carefully on this slippery road...

 It's not that difficult.  You can build another Apache with mod_perl
 and run it on the same machine without having any effect at all on the
 existing server, which can continue to run as normal.  All you have to
 do is to configure the new server to listen to a port other than port
 80 (to which presumably your production server is currently listening)
 and you can play with your new server until you get it to do what it
 needs to do.

 The details are all in the Guide:

 http://perl.apache.org/guide

 and you might also want to have a look at the Eagle Book:

 Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C, ISBN 1-56592-567-X

 and/or the Cookbook

 http://www.modperlcookbook.org

 if you haven't already.

 73,
 Ged.

 (PS: GY: OK?)






Re: Pipelinning Output APP Framework

2002-04-05 Thread Ged Haywood

Hi there,

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip,snip]
 My goal is to develop an open source chemical tracking system.
 The requirements are
 -web based
 -FAST

These two requirements are mutually exclusive.  If you can be a little
more specific about your requirements I can probably be more helpful.

73,
Ged.




Re: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread Matt Sergeant

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Rasoul Hajikhani wrote:

 Hello folks,
 Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
 do you think of it? Is it a good buy? Appreciate feed back.

I have two copies, as the one at work keeps getting borrowed.

I would say it's different to the Eagle book - it takes a different tack
(which is kinda the point). I find both books useful - the Eagle book for
explaining the Apache request cycle very clearly, and the Cookbook for
explaining some of the nuances of mod_perl very clearly.

Basically the Cookbook is much more about solving specific problems than
the Eagle book, and as such is much more useful long term and short term,
and I also found the explanations a bit clearer in the Cookbook.

So I'd get both, but the Cookbook first if you're new to mod_perl, and
then the Eagle book if you're still confused about some issues.

I promised Geoff I would do a full review, and I'm doing an OS upgrade
this weekend, so perhaps I'll get a chance to go over the bits of the book
I've missed so far and post the review somewhere.

-- 
!-- Matt --
:-Get a smart net/:-




proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24

2002-04-05 Thread ___cliff rayman___

i had trouble using a proxy front end to both
a mod_perl and mod_php back end servers.

this works fine for me at 1.3.23, so I reverted
back to it.  i copied the httpd.conf files
from the 1.3.24 to my downgraded 1.3.23
and everything worked correctly on the first
try.

i was getting garbage characters before the first
html or doctype tag, and a 0 character at
the end.  also, there was a delay before the
connection would close.  i tried turning keep
alives off and on in the back end server,
but i did not note a change in behavior
i also tried some different buffer directives,
including the new ProxyIOBufferSize.

these garbage characters and delays were
not present serving static content from the
front end server, or when directly requesting
content directly from either of the back end
servers.

i know they've made some mods to the
proxy module, including support for HTTP/1.1,
but i did not have time to research the exact
cause of the problem.

just a word of warning before someone
spends hours in frustration, or perhaps
someone can give me a tip if they've
solved this problem.

--
___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.genwax.com/





Re: proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24

2002-04-05 Thread Thomas Eibner

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:33:35PM -0800, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
 i had trouble using a proxy front end to both
 a mod_perl and mod_php back end servers.
 
 this works fine for me at 1.3.23, so I reverted
 back to it.  i copied the httpd.conf files
 from the 1.3.24 to my downgraded 1.3.23
 and everything worked correctly on the first
 try.
 
 i was getting garbage characters before the first
 html or doctype tag, and a 0 character at
 the end.  also, there was a delay before the
 connection would close.  i tried turning keep
 alives off and on in the back end server,
 but i did not note a change in behavior
 i also tried some different buffer directives,
 including the new ProxyIOBufferSize.

That was the size of the document when you get it in a chunked
response. And there were some problems in 1.3.24 where mod_proxy
returned the data it had collected in the chunked format even if
the client requesting the data didn't explicitly ask for it. 

 these garbage characters and delays were
 not present serving static content from the
 front end server, or when directly requesting
 content directly from either of the back end
 servers.
 
 i know they've made some mods to the
 proxy module, including support for HTTP/1.1,
 but i did not have time to research the exact
 cause of the problem.
 
 just a word of warning before someone
 spends hours in frustration, or perhaps
 someone can give me a tip if they've
 solved this problem.

There are some few messages concerning the problem a while ago either on
this list or the dev@httpd list.

http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/apache0204/1/3.html
etc.

Can't really remember if they have fixed it in CVS already.

-- 
  Thomas Eibner http://thomas.eibner.dk/ DnsZone http://dnszone.org/
  mod_pointer http://stderr.net/mod_pointer http://photos.eibner.dk/



Re: proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24

2002-04-05 Thread ___cliff rayman___

Thomas Eibner wrote:


 There are some few messages concerning the problem a while ago either on
 this list or the dev@httpd list.

 http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/apache0204/1/3.html
 etc.

thanks - it must have been a bad googling day yesterday since i did not come
up with this info.



 Can't really remember if they have fixed it in CVS already.

i'll wait till 1.3.25 which will probably be coming out sooner than
expected.  ;-)


--
___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.genwax.com/





Re: proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24

2002-04-05 Thread Thomas Eibner

On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 03:23:38PM -0800, ___cliff rayman___ wrote:
 Thomas Eibner wrote:
 
 
  There are some few messages concerning the problem a while ago either on
  this list or the dev@httpd list.
 
  http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/apache0204/1/3.html
  etc.
 
 thanks - it must have been a bad googling day yesterday since i did not come
 up with this info.

Somehow google actually just indexed that message it seems, Apr 05 was the
time stamp. But there was some discussion about it on dev@httpd when
1.3.24 was released.

 
 
  Can't really remember if they have fixed it in CVS already.
 
 i'll wait till 1.3.25 which will probably be coming out sooner than
 expected.  ;-)

Let's see - with the dev people pushing for GA on 2.0.

-- 
  Thomas Eibner http://thomas.eibner.dk/ DnsZone http://dnszone.org/
  mod_pointer http://stderr.net/mod_pointer http://photos.eibner.dk/



ANNOUNCE: Bricolage 1.3.1

2002-04-05 Thread Sam Tregar

The Bricolage development team is proud to announce the release of
Bricolage version 1.3.1. This is a development release with new
features as well as numerous bug fixes.  Summary of major changes (see
the Changes file in the distribution for details):

*   SOAP interface fully implemented

*   New FTP distribution move method

*   New preferences to change the way URIs are formatted

Here's a brief description of Bricolage:

Bricolage is a full-featured, open-source, enterprise-class content
management system. It offers a browser-based interface for ease-of
use, a full-fledged templating system with complete programming
language support for flexibility, and many other features. It
operates in an Apache/mod_perl environment, and uses the PostgreSQL
RDBMS for its repository.

More information on Bricolage can be found on its home page.

http://bricolage.thepirtgroup.com/

And it can be downloaded from SourceForge.

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=34789

--The Bricolage Team




Re: Open3

2002-04-05 Thread Ron Savage

On Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:54:09 -0800, Rasoul Hajikhani wrote:
Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:

At 01:44 PM 4/3/02 -0800, Rasoul Hajikhani wrote:
Hello folks,
I am writing a web based interface to gpg and am using IPC::Open3

Try IPC::Run

--
Cheers
Ron Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/04/2002
http://savage.net.au/index.html





RE: proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24

2002-04-05 Thread Mark Hazen



 -Original Message-
 From: ___cliff rayman___ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:34 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: proxy front to modperl back with 1.3.24


 i had trouble using a proxy front end to both
 a mod_perl and mod_php back end servers.

 this works fine for me at 1.3.23, so I reverted
 back to it.  i copied the httpd.conf files
 from the 1.3.24 to my downgraded 1.3.23
 and everything worked correctly on the first
 try.

 i was getting garbage characters before the first
 html or doctype tag, and a 0 character at
 the end.  also, there was a delay before the
 connection would close.  i tried turning keep
 alives off and on in the back end server,
 but i did not note a change in behavior
 i also tried some different buffer directives,
 including the new ProxyIOBufferSize.

 these garbage characters and delays were
 not present serving static content from the
 front end server, or when directly requesting
 content directly from either of the back end
 servers.


I have the exact same type setup with my machine.  1.3.24 front-end serving
up a modperl 1.3.24 backend.  As already noted, chunked responses (with
their garbage characters delineating the seperation of chunks) are a
HTTP/1.1 response.  If a HTTP/1.0 client asks for something, it needs to get
a 1.0 response.  The problem is that when the front-end Apache proxy passes
the request onto the mod_perl server, it now always seems to make a 1.1
request.  So when the mod_perl Apache sees this, it answers in 1.1
(chunked), and the front-end Apache server passes this 1.1 response onto 1.0
client.  I figured this out really quickly when people started writing in
and saying what are all the garbage characters?  I found a solution that
works.  In the mod_perl Apache httpd.conf file, I added this section:
IfModule mod_setenvif.c
BrowserMatch   downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
BrowserMatch . downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
BrowserMatch / downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
BrowserMatch _ downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0
/IfModule

It basically catches any browser that has a space, period, slash, or
underscore.  This covers every browser or crawler I had seen.  What this
does is forces the mod_perl Apache to answer in HTTP/1.0.  So:

When a 1.0 client makes a request, the front-end Apache passes this request
onto the mod_perl Apache as a 1.1 request (stupidly), but the mod_perl
Apache will only answer in 1.0.  So the front-end Apache just passes this
1.0 request on.

When a 1.1 client makes a request, the front-end Apache passes this request
onto the mod_perl Apache as a 1.1 request (not stupidly), the mod_perl
Apache will answer in 1.0, but then the front-end Apache will re-format the
request into a 1.1 request to answer the 1.1 client.


What amazingly baffles me is that the Apache team does not have the most
minor test suite that they run to check on things before they make releases.
They have a history of these kinds of problems.  In my mind, they are famous
for re-occuring bugs.  Everytime a bug is found and fixed, a test routine
needs to be built for it that checks for this bug in all future releases.  I
love Apache, and the people behind are amazing, but I am always paranoid of
new releases because of all these recurring (or stupidly easy to find) bugs.

Mark




solution to readdir/opendir mod_perl problem: rebuild!

2002-04-05 Thread Louis Semprini


We upgraded our systems to RedHat 7.2 with glibc2.2.4
and all of a sudden, our mod_perl scripts which call
readdir() would either fail with an exception, or
readdir() in list context would return the correct # of
items but each item as an empty string.

We scanned the modperl list and found about 50 posts in
about 8 threads on this topic (!) but no answers.

There were various workaround suggestions, such as
using glob(), but these were not useful to us since we
rely on a number of third-party perl modules which call
readdir() and it was not practical to modify them.

We discovered that this problem is caused by a build
mismatch between perl and mod_perl that is a result of
a nasty binary incompatibility between glibc2.2.4 and
glibc2.1.3.  So much for DSO versioning!

To get rid of the problem, you _must_ rebuild perl from
scratch on a system with glibc2.2.4 (in our case we had
perl 5.6.1), then you _must_ rebuild mod_perl from
scratch on the same system (we had mod_perl 1.26) and
then build and run httpd on the same system.

(ok, technically it doesn't have to be the same system,
but you must have the same glibc version installed
during each build and also when you run httpd).

Or if you're not the building type, you'll need to
locate some pre-done build that was done entirely
on a system with glibc2.2.4.

The analysis of the problem goes something like this:

- the code which is hurt by the glibc incompatibility
is the code that actually calls the C readdir()
function.  it gets built into
/opt/perl/lib/5.6.1/i686-linux/CORE/libperl.a by the
perl build.

- that code is then statically linked into mod_perl by
the mod_perl build (regardless of whether mod_perl
itself is statically or dynamically linked to httpd).

- when you build libperl.a on RedHat 6 with glibc2.1.3,
struct dirent is 272 bytes long and dirent.d_name is at
offset 15.

- when you build libperl.a on RedHat 7 with glibc2.2.4,
struct dirent is 276 bytes long and dirent.d_name is at
offset 19.

- a compile time / runtime discrepancy here could
definitely cause the symptom we're seeing (right number
of files, but empty filenames) because the struct is
like this:

struct dirent {
longd_ino;
__kernel_off_t  d_off;
unsigned short  d_reclen;
chard_name[256];
};

If glibc2.2 placed the name at the correct place, but
libperl.a was reading it out 4 bytes early, then
libperl.a would probably see a byte of 0 as the first
byte of the name, hence looking like an empty C string.

We say this because d_off is probably either 0 all the
time (since the man page says Use of other fields
[including d_off] will harm the portability of your
programs,) or it's probably 0 because it's the third
byte of d_off and you'd have to have a directory that
was 256*256 bytes or more in order to get a nonzero
value for d_off on a little endian machine.  So really
this bug discriminates against people with a lot of
files or big-endian machines :) We could test this
theory by creating large directories but we're happy
that rebuilding it works :)


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Re: solution to readdir/opendir mod_perl problem: rebuild!

2002-04-05 Thread Stas Bekman

Louis Semprini wrote:
 
 We upgraded our systems to RedHat 7.2 with glibc2.2.4
 and all of a sudden, our mod_perl scripts which call
 readdir() would either fail with an exception, or
 readdir() in list context would return the correct # of
 items but each item as an empty string.
 
 We scanned the modperl list and found about 50 posts in
 about 8 threads on this topic (!) but no answers.
 
 There were various workaround suggestions, such as
 using glob(), but these were not useful to us since we
 rely on a number of third-party perl modules which call
 readdir() and it was not practical to modify them.
 
 We discovered that this problem is caused by a build
 mismatch between perl and mod_perl that is a result of
 a nasty binary incompatibility between glibc2.2.4 and
 glibc2.1.3.  So much for DSO versioning!
 
 To get rid of the problem, you _must_ rebuild perl from
 scratch on a system with glibc2.2.4 (in our case we had
 perl 5.6.1), then you _must_ rebuild mod_perl from
 scratch on the same system (we had mod_perl 1.26) and
 then build and run httpd on the same system.
 
 (ok, technically it doesn't have to be the same system,
 but you must have the same glibc version installed
 during each build and also when you run httpd).

Thanks a lot Louis,

This solution will appear in the next release of the guide in the 
troubleshooting chapter.

__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com




Apache 2.0 gold -- now when mod_perl 2.0?

2002-04-05 Thread Jon Coulter

It looks like Apache 2.0(.35) is 'gold', so when can we expect a 'gold'
version of mod_perl 2.0 so we can actually make apache 2 fun? ;p

Jon Coulter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 




RE: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-05 Thread Jeff

I bought it two weeks ago, as a mod_perl newbie, and recommend it. 

I really like the cookbook style: 'You want to XXX' = snippet / recipe.
If you already read Perl, it is fast and compact.

I have had questions along the way [specific to the cookbook], but
posting a question on this list gets an almost immediate response.

Summation: Worth the money - buy it.

Regards
Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 05 April 2002 21:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_perl Cook Book


Hello folks,
Has anyone purchased the mod_perl cook book from this list? If so, what
do you think of it? Is it a good buy? Appreciate feed back.
Thanks in advance
-r





Software Integration Testing

2002-04-05 Thread Medi Montaseri

I was wondering if anyone has any experiences in Software Integration
Testing
using home made or known  methodologies that are being used. I came
across
one called Cyclomatic Complexity (for example)

The context being

The software system has three subsystems; Two subsystems in the kernel
and
one subsystem (a multi-threading C++ application) in user land.
Components are identified as kernel modules. (think installable kernel
modules).

I am looking for the following

- Books on software integration testing
- URLs on software integration testing
- Methodologies that you have worked with or read up on that might work
- Home made solutions that you designed

Thanks

--
-
Medi Montaseri   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Distributed Systems EngineerHTTP://www.CyberShell.com
CyberShell Engineering
-