Re: ANNOUNCE: Perl 5.8.0 Release Candidate 3

2002-07-14 Thread Phil Dobbin

On 14/7/02 at 15:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The Doctor) wrote:

> I get

[big snip]

> ./perl: can't resolve symbol 'Perl_get_sv'

Mine installed fine after make and make test with 98 percent results into 
/test/perl580/bin/perl but I get similar error messages re: dyld

It's late here (BST) and the build and test did take a long time (I gotta day job ;-), 
so I'll go through some more stuff on the test machine tomorrow.

iBook (Late 2001)/Mac OS X.1.5/256MB RAM

bash2.05 philbook@localhost ~ $ perl -V
Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 0) configuration:
  Platform:
osname=darwin, osvers=5.5, archname=darwin
uname='darwin localhost 5.5 darwin kernel version 5.5: thu may 30 14:51:26 pdt 
2002; root:xnuxnu-201.42.3.obj~1release_ppc power macintosh powerpc '
config_args='-des -Dprefix=/test/perl580 -Uinstallusrbinperl'
hint=previous, useposix=true, d_sigaction=define
usethreads=undef use5005threads=undef useithreads=undef usemultiplicity=undef
useperlio=define d_sfio=undef uselargefiles=define usesocks=undef
use64bitint=undef use64bitall=undef uselongdouble=undef
usemymalloc=n, bincompat5005=undef
  Compiler:
cc='cc', ccflags ='-pipe -fno-common -DINT32_MIN_BROKEN -DINT64_MIN_BROKEN 
-no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include',
optimize='-O3',
cppflags='-no-cpp-precomp -pipe -fno-common -DINT32_MIN_BROKEN -DINT64_MIN_BROKEN 
-no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -pipe -fno-common 
-DINT32_MIN_BROKEN -DINT64_MIN_BROKEN -no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing 
-I/usr/local/include'
ccversion='', gccversion='2.95.2 19991024 (release)', gccosandvers=''
intsize=4, longsize=4, ptrsize=4, doublesize=8, byteorder=4321
d_longlong=define, longlongsize=8, d_longdbl=define, longdblsize=8
ivtype='long', ivsize=4, nvtype='double', nvsize=8, Off_t='off_t', lseeksize=8
alignbytes=8, prototype=define
  Linker and Libraries:
ld='cc', ldflags =' -flat_namespace -L/usr/local/lib'
libpth=/usr/local/lib /usr/lib
libs=-lm -lc
perllibs=-lm -lc
libc=/usr/lib/libc.dylib, so=dylib, useshrplib=true, libperl=libperl.dylib
gnulibc_version=''
  Dynamic Linking:
dlsrc=dl_dyld.xs, dlext=bundle, d_dlsymun=undef, ccdlflags=' '
cccdlflags=' ', lddlflags=' -flat_namespace -bundle -undefined suppress 
-L/usr/local/lib'


Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): 
  Compile-time options: USE_LARGE_FILES
  Built under darwin
  Compiled at Jul 14 2002 20:13:39
  @INC:
/Library/Perl/darwin
/Library/Perl
/Library/Perl/darwin
/Library/Perl
/Library/Perl
/Network/Library/Perl/darwin
/Network/Library/Perl
/Network/Library/Perl

Pretty good though. Straight outta the box on to a Mac...

Regards,

Phil.



Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin

On 21/6/02 at 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote:

> > Phil Dobbin wrote:
> > On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote:
> 
> >>If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way 
> it
> >>should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrustful 
> >>and
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is this really the 
> > way the mod_perl list is going to go?
> > 
> > Any clarification appreciated :-)
> 
> Yes Phil, this is how it was since the beginning (1996) and the 
> majority 
> seems to be happy about this trend

[...]

Hi, Stas.

Thanks for the clarification.

Much obliged :-)

Regards,

Phil.



Re: [JOB] Crack OOP Perl whitebox tester wanted

2002-06-21 Thread Phil Dobbin

On 20/6/02 at 20:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Mornini) wrote:

> We're 1 year into development of a system that is OO Perl, mod_perl,
> DBI and DBD::Oracle on Linux.
> 
> We've spent a lot of energy doing it right and writing tests as we go.
> This has given us huge benefits in the life of the project, but our 
> current
> whitebox tester has decided to move to Washington, D.C. so we need
> somebody to fill his large shoes.
> 
> If you're a good Perl programmer who has a strong sense of "the way it
> should be" and can be simultaneously mean, nasty, angry, distrustful 
> and

[snip]

Sorry if I haven't kept up with this thread but, is this really the way the mod_perl 
list is going to go?

Any clarification appreciated :-)

Regards,

Phil.



RE: mod_perl Cook Book

2002-04-06 Thread Phil Dobbin

on Saturday, April 06, 2002 08:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff) wrote:

>I bought it two weeks ago, as a mod_perl newbie, and recommend it. 
>
>I really like the cookbook style: 'You want to XXX' => snippet / recipe.
>If you already read Perl, it is fast and compact.
>
>I have had questions along the way [specific to the cookbook], but
>posting a question on this list gets an almost immediate response.
>
>Summation: Worth the money - buy it.

I agree completely. I'm setting up a server on OS X having just got a network 
connection and it's been invaluable.

It's definitely the book to buy _before_ the Eagle book.

Have fun,

Regards,

Phil.