Re: [ADMIN] can we have a reply-to header?

2001-08-25 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Thomas Eibner wrote:

> Am I the only one that always have to go *doh* after I replied to a
> message here?

Well, the harm is much less than when you go *doh* after realizing
that you sent something to thousands of people.

In any case, the answer is "No." as long as I have access to the
list configuration for the mod_perl lists[1]. :-)


 - ask

[1] likewise for all the perl.org lists; munging the Reply-To header
is just a bad idea and I wish it'd go away.

-- 
ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
more than a billion impressions per week, http://valueclick.com





Re: [ADMIN] can we have a reply-to header?

2001-08-15 Thread Dave Baker

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:30:05PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, John D Groenveld wrote:
> 
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 
> NOOO!!! Make it stop.  I swear to god that if this
> argument starts on this list (and I think its already been had) I will go
> to your homes and stuff chili peppers up your nose.
>

If not for it's violently offtopic nature, I would respectfully offer:

   http://www.devbrain.com/reply-to-non-harmful.html


Dave

-- 

- Dave Baker  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  :  http://dsb3.com/ -
GnuPG:  1024D/D7BCA55D / 09CD D148 57DE 711E 6708  B772 0DD4 51D5 D7BC A55D




Re: [ADMIN] can we have a reply-to header?

2001-08-15 Thread Dave Rolsky

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, John D Groenveld wrote:

> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

NOOO!!! Make it stop.  I swear to god that if this
argument starts on this list (and I think its already been had) I will go
to your homes and stuff chili peppers up your nose.


-dave

/*==
www.urth.org
We await the New Sun
==*/




Re: [ADMIN] can we have a reply-to header?

2001-08-15 Thread John D Groenveld

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[ADMIN] can we have a reply-to header?

2001-08-15 Thread Thomas Eibner

Am I the only one that always have to go *doh* after I replied to a
message here?

-- 
  Thomas Eibner  DnsZone 
  mod_pointer