Re: Alliance? WAS - Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection

2000-12-08 Thread Robin Berjon

At 08:13 08/12/2000 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
The could be although ActiveState has a product that competes with mod_perl 
on the NT side called PerlEx.

What is too bad about the silence about the relationship is that PerlEx as 
a product could really benefit from evolving upon the back of a mod_perl 
code base.

In addition to that, they also have Zope-Perl, which iirc is run for AS by
Gisle Aas, who probably knows a lot about mod_perl. Now if AS would support
mod_perl, they'd get a very broad range of products for the dynamic server
marketplace. That could be a good argument for them support mod_perl.

-- robin b.
Paranoids are people, too; they have their own problems.  It's easy to
criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Alliance? WAS - Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection

2000-12-07 Thread Aaron Johnson

What about working with ActiveState?  I know they were primarily Windows
focused, but they now have Linux and Solaris versions of Perl pre compiled.
mod_perl can now be gotten to work with the latest ActivePerl build (622) for
Windows.
(thanks to Randy Kobes, or at least I think that is who has pushed for this)

I have to admit that until their compile worked with mod_perl I saw them as
'evil' through the eyes of Perl.

ActiveState (c|w)ould give credibility to the mod_perl from a business
standpoint.
ActiveState also has the new Komodo IDE which is a cross platform IDE for Perl
and Python.  It uses the Mozilla engine.
http://www.activestate.com/Corporate/Communications/Releases/Press974947521.html

(for the seperate discussion of GUI interfaces)

Should someone try to form an alliance with ActiveState to insure they don't
ignore mod_perl users or want to be users?

Aaron Johnson

Stas Bekman wrote:

 Well as you've probably figured out, based on the load of email from me,
 I've dropped my last job, in order to finally finish the mod_perl book,
 have some rest and make a push to mod_perl.

 Yesterday I've updated the stats page:
 http://perl.apache.org/netcraft/ and the results are so-so, we go down on
 the number of domains. Which I suppose mainly caused by people reading the
 guide and deploying the front-end proxy solution, thus making mod_perl
 un-seen by various scanners like netcraft.

 In Paris we couldn't hire a single mod_perl programmer, because people
 don't even know what that. They know a lot about php and ASP. It's true
 that they don't even know what's Perl :(

 But, you all know that php pretty much takes over. Why? For two reasons:
 1) initial corporate pushing (press/ads)
 2) once well known, the word of the mouth does the rest.

 mod_perl lucks the corporate money/PR to get pushed. But we can still work
 on the exposure, which will bring corporate money/PR thru the word of the
 mouth.

 Luckily Matt has got sick of waiting for someone to work on the advocacy
 of mod_perl and he has just taken over it. Having a good informational
 site is good, but it's not enough. We need to solve the problem of people
 to find this site and wanting to use mod_perl. Solution? Spreading the
 word.

 I see two main streams:
 1) Online zines.
 2) Conferences.

 I think that we should start working on locating ezines wanting to publish
 mod_perl related articles (preferrably for a fee, to give incentives for
 others to write) and conferences where mod_perl can be relevant. The data
 is to be collected and distributed to the people who wish to advocate
 mod_perl, thru written articles and conference classes. I suppose that we
 will also look for companies who want to order mod_perl classes and find
 the teachers in the appropriate areas.

 May be we could organize some certification classes, to give more PR to
 mod_perl.

 I suppose that much more can be done. Comments are welcome.

 _
 Stas Bekman  JAm_pH --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker
 http://stason.org/   mod_perl Guide  http://perl.apache.org/guide
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://apachetoday.com http://jazzvalley.com
 http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Alliance? WAS - Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection

2000-12-07 Thread Gunther Birznieks

The could be although ActiveState has a product that competes with mod_perl 
on the NT side called PerlEx.

What is too bad about the silence about the relationship is that PerlEx as 
a product could really benefit from evolving upon the back of a mod_perl 
code base.

...In terms of rapidly finding bugs with persistent Perl engines in a 
larger user base as well as sharing mod_perl's Guide (which is way better 
than the docs that come with PerlEx -- eg the PerlEx docs suggest sharing a 
DBI Handle using $dbh ||= connect() instead of Apache::DBI which would work 
much better under PerlEx straight out of the box!) .

I've suggested this before on their PerlEx user list but have been ignored 
by them. Afterawhile I just stopped any suggesting as I interpret the lack 
of response to mean that they feel differently but for whatever reason 
won't state such reasons publicly and don't feel its worth the time in lieu 
of anything else.

Maybe they would feel different now if someone else approached them.

At 05:07 PM 12/7/00 -0500, Aaron Johnson wrote:
What about working with ActiveState?  I know they were primarily Windows
focused, but they now have Linux and Solaris versions of Perl pre compiled.
mod_perl can now be gotten to work with the latest ActivePerl build (622) for
Windows.
(thanks to Randy Kobes, or at least I think that is who has pushed for this)

I have to admit that until their compile worked with mod_perl I saw them as
'evil' through the eyes of Perl.

ActiveState (c|w)ould give credibility to the mod_perl from a business
standpoint.
ActiveState also has the new Komodo IDE which is a cross platform IDE for Perl
and Python.  It uses the Mozilla engine.
http://www.activestate.com/Corporate/Communications/Releases/Press974947521.html

(for the seperate discussion of GUI interfaces)

Should someone try to form an alliance with ActiveState to insure they don't
ignore mod_perl users or want to be users?

Aaron Johnson

Stas Bekman wrote:

  Well as you've probably figured out, based on the load of email from me,
  I've dropped my last job, in order to finally finish the mod_perl book,
  have some rest and make a push to mod_perl.
 
  Yesterday I've updated the stats page:
  http://perl.apache.org/netcraft/ and the results are so-so, we go down on
  the number of domains. Which I suppose mainly caused by people reading the
  guide and deploying the front-end proxy solution, thus making mod_perl
  un-seen by various scanners like netcraft.
 
  In Paris we couldn't hire a single mod_perl programmer, because people
  don't even know what that. They know a lot about php and ASP. It's true
  that they don't even know what's Perl :(
 
  But, you all know that php pretty much takes over. Why? For two reasons:
  1) initial corporate pushing (press/ads)
  2) once well known, the word of the mouth does the rest.
 
  mod_perl lucks the corporate money/PR to get pushed. But we can still work
  on the exposure, which will bring corporate money/PR thru the word of the
  mouth.
 
  Luckily Matt has got sick of waiting for someone to work on the advocacy
  of mod_perl and he has just taken over it. Having a good informational
  site is good, but it's not enough. We need to solve the problem of people
  to find this site and wanting to use mod_perl. Solution? Spreading the
  word.
 
  I see two main streams:
  1) Online zines.
  2) Conferences.
 
  I think that we should start working on locating ezines wanting to publish
  mod_perl related articles (preferrably for a fee, to give incentives for
  others to write) and conferences where mod_perl can be relevant. The data
  is to be collected and distributed to the people who wish to advocate
  mod_perl, thru written articles and conference classes. I suppose that we
  will also look for companies who want to order mod_perl classes and find
  the teachers in the appropriate areas.
 
  May be we could organize some certification classes, to give more PR to
  mod_perl.
 
  I suppose that much more can be done. Comments are welcome.
 
  _
  Stas Bekman  JAm_pH --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker
  http://stason.org/   mod_perl Guide  http://perl.apache.org/guide
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://apachetoday.com http://jazzvalley.com
  http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

__
Gunther Birznieks ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
eXtropia - The Web Technology Company
http://www.extropia.com/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL