Re: Dual Apache setups

[Ask Bjoern Hansen]

On 9 Sep 2002, Jason Czerak wrote:

> I'm messing around with apache 2.0 and modperl 1.99 and Haven't been
> able to come across any docs that state that I would or would not need a
> dual apache setup for high load sites.

I don't think anyone have any or much real world experience with
this yet.  In theory it will probably not be needed if you are using
a threaded setup.

I'm sure anything you can tell us after trying it in a busy setup
will be greatly appreciated.  :-)

> I wish to have apache 2.0 threaded.

Don't parse stuff back and forth between threads in shared arrays
just yet, or you'll suffer memory leaks.  :-)


  - ask (suffering memory leaks)

-- 
ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do();

Dual Apache setups

[Jason Czerak]

I'm messing around with apache 2.0 and modperl 1.99 and Haven't been
able to come across any docs that state that I would or would not need a
dual apache setup for high load sites.

I wish to have apache 2.0 threaded. 

currently my setup is Apache 1.3.26 with mod_ssl and mod_proxy and
mod_rewrite and all other unnecessary modules not compiled in. and for
dynamic requests, it proxys them to the back end as suggested by the
mod_perl guide, very please with this performance and memory usage. Was
wondering what is the statues of such a configuration with apache 2.x.x.

--
Jason Czerak