RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Bannerman
Stas,

Replies below:
--
   Steve Bannerman
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   44.(0)1865.273866


> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2003 18:07
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry
> (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...
>
>
> > ...snip...
> >
>
> The docs need work, this is just a copy of mp1 registry docs, which need
> adjustments. However most things work the same way. The
> differences between
> Registry and PerlRun are easily summarizes with this diff:
>
> ModPerl-Registry> diff -u lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm
> --- lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm 2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
> +++ lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm  2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -package ModPerl::Registry;
> +package ModPerl::PerlRun;
>
>   use strict;
>   use warnings FATAL => 'all';
> @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
>   make_namespace  => 'make_namespace',
>   namespace_root  => 'namespace_root',
>   namespace_from  => 'namespace_from_filename',
> -is_cached   => 'is_cached',
> -should_compile  => 'should_compile_if_modified',
> -flush_namespace => 'NOP',
> +is_cached   => 'FALSE',
> +should_compile  => 'TRUE',
> +flush_namespace => 'flush_namespace_normal',
>   cache_table => 'cache_table_common',
> -cache_it=> 'cache_it',
> +cache_it=> 'NOP',
>   read_script => 'read_script',
>   rewrite_shebang => 'rewrite_shebang',
>   set_script_name => 'set_script_name',
> @@ -53,17 +53,10 @@
>
> PerlRun doesn't cache the script on each request and it flushes
> the script's
> namespace on each request. You can see the actual functions in
> lib/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm.

Thanks, that's helpful...it shows me why PerlRun works.

However, it doesn't really explain why the "root problem" exists.  The way I
think about it, the creation of a new CGI "object" should create a new "set
of slots" for instance data.  Then, each request's parameters would be
stored in a "slot" of the new CGI instance rather than in the "global set of
slots" for the class of CGI instances.

Maybe I don't understand the "object paradigm" in perl correctly; however, I
do understand it very well in general.  Thus, it seems like a defect in
either perl (the language) or CGI.pm.  I'm guessing there's some
justification for it in "performance"...however, it just doesn't seem right.

Thoughts?

 If you can try to take it from
> here and see
> what the problem is (your code/registry?), that would be cool. Thanks.
>

Unfortunately, I don't really know how to "take it from here."  I'm pretty
new to perl and very new to mod_perl.  Thus I'm "reaching out" to you guys
to find out if anybody has solved this problem...unfortunately,
Christopher's suggestion didn't work (unless I implemented it incorrectly).

> Also make sure you are using the latest CGI.pm (2.93 or higher is good).

I'm using CGI.pm-2.98.

Cheers

>
> __
> Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com
>



HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Bannerman
All,

I apologize if this has already been covered...I looked at the archives
since May but couldn't see anything covering this (there were related items
but their solutions didn't solve this problem).

Here an explanation of the problem:

We want to post experiment results to an "upload server" which is running
Apache HTTP Server (2.0.46) and mod_perl (1.99_09).  When we post a sequence
of files to the server, some of them are written to the local disk and some
are not.  That is, the test fails when using ModPerl::Registry but it
succeeds when using ModPerl::PerlRun.

In analyzing which ones work and which ones do not, I wrote a quick test to
see why the transfer is not working.  From the looks of the results, it
appears that the first request handled by a particular Apache process/thread
"works" and that any subsequent requests handled by that thread "fail."
Works means that the file in the test gets saved to disk and fail means that
a file of size "0" gets written to disk.

Below are the httpd.conf segments (working and failing), the test client
(test_client.pl) and the test server (test_server.pl which is accessible
from the /cpdn/cgi-bin location).

Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance...

Also, does it matter if I use ModPerl::PerlRun instead of ModPerl::Registry
(I have read some about this at
http://apache.perl.org/docs/2.0/api/ModPerl/Registry.html but the
documentation there is a little light).

--
Working httpd.conf
--

  AllowOverride None
  SetHandler perl-script
  PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::PerlRun
  PerlOptions +ParseHeaders
  Options +ExecCGI
  Allow from All


--
Failing httpd.conf
--

  AllowOverride None
  SetHandler perl-script
  PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry
  PerlOptions +ParseHeaders
  Options +ExecCGI
  Allow from All


--
test_client.pl
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;

use LWP::UserAgent;
use HTTP::Request::Common;

my $postUrl = $ARGV[0];
my $file = $ARGV[1];

my $postType = 'form-data';

my $ua = new LWP::UserAgent;
my $req = POST($postUrl,
   Content_Type => $postType,
   Content => [ file => ["$file"] ]);

my $res = $ua->request($req);
if ($res->is_success()) {
  print "POST test successful\n";
  print $res->content();
} else {
  print STDERR "POST test failed";
  print STDERR "code: " . $res->code() . "\n";
  print STDERR "message: " . $res->message() . "\n";
}

--
test_server.pl
--
use strict;
use CGI qw(:standard);

my $cgi = new CGI;
&saveFile();

sub saveFile {
  my $inputfile = $cgi->param('file');
  my $outputfile = "/tmp/file-" . $$ . "-" . time();
  open(FILE,">$outputfile") || printError();
  my $buffer;
  while (read($inputfile,$buffer,2096)) {
print FILE $buffer;
  }
  close(FILE);
  undef $buffer;
}

sub printError {
  print header();
  print "Content-type: text/plain\n";
  print "Status: 500$\n";
  print "Message: Internal Error\n";
  exit;
}

Cheers
--
   Steve Bannerman
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   44.(0)1865.273866



RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry(okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-14 Thread Steve Bannerman
Perrin,

Thanks for your response...my replies below:
--
   Steve Bannerman
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   44.(0)1865.273866


> -Original Message-
> From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 August 2003 20:40
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using
> ModPerl::Registry(okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...
>
> ...snip...
>
> I believe I see the source of your troubles in the code that you
> posted.  You are creating a closure by using a lexical variable and then
> accessing it from within a sub.  This is a no-no with any long-running
> system like mod_perl.  You can get away with it in a standard CGI
> environment (or PerlRun) because it just exits after each request
> instead of running the same code again.
>
> Here is the offending section:
>
> my $cgi = new CGI;
> &saveFile();
>
> sub saveFile {
>   my $inputfile = $cgi->param('file');
> ... etc ...
> }
>
> Change it to this:
>
> my $cgi = new CGI;
> saveFile($cgi);
>
> sub saveFile {
>   my $cgi = shift;
>   my $inputfile = $cgi->param('file');
> ... etc ...
> }
>
> I think that will do it.

You're correct...that made it work.

So with respect to your explanation about the "long running perl system," am
I to understand that the old version of the saveFile() subroutine uses a
reference to a different $cgi instance that the $cgi instance in the main
body of the script?

As I said, I'm new to perl but that seems to be an awfully strange behavior
of the language...if true, shouldn't the compilation (of the subroutine)
fail because it references an undeclared variable ($cgi)?

Cheers

>
> - Perrin



RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry(okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-06 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 04:50, Steve Bannerman wrote:
> However, it doesn't really explain why the "root problem" exists.  The way I
> think about it, the creation of a new CGI "object" should create a new "set
> of slots" for instance data.

That would make sense, but very little about CGI.pm actually works in
the way you would expect.  It's a very bizarre module because of the
dual functional and object interface, and it uses lots of globals even
if you are only calling the OO interface.  If possible, I would suggest
you consider using CGI::Simple instead, which is a drop-in replacement.

> Maybe I don't understand the "object paradigm" in perl correctly; however, I
> do understand it very well in general.  Thus, it seems like a defect in
> either perl (the language) or CGI.pm.

It's a problem with CGI.pm, not with your understanding of Perl OO.

I believe I see the source of your troubles in the code that you
posted.  You are creating a closure by using a lexical variable and then
accessing it from within a sub.  This is a no-no with any long-running
system like mod_perl.  You can get away with it in a standard CGI
environment (or PerlRun) because it just exits after each request
instead of running the same code again.

Here is the offending section:

my $cgi = new CGI;
&saveFile();

sub saveFile {
  my $inputfile = $cgi->param('file');
... etc ...
}

Change it to this:

my $cgi = new CGI;
saveFile($cgi);

sub saveFile {
  my $cgi = shift;
  my $inputfile = $cgi->param('file');
... etc ...
}

I think that will do it.

- Perrin


RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-06 Thread Steve Bannerman
Christopher,

Thanks for the suggestion; unfortunately, it doesn't work.  I made the
change you suggested (inserting "CGI->initialize_globals();" just before
creating an instance of CGI) and restarted apache/httpd.  The same
result...the first time the script executes it saves the file
properly...after that, a file is created with 0 size.

Besides, as you (and others prescribing the use of initialize_globals())
described it, shouldn't subsequent executions of the script write the same
file as the first execution.  That is, if the parameters of the CGI
instances are actually global, wouldn't the same array of bytes still be in
the global 'file' parameter?

Cheers
--
   Steve Bannerman
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   44.(0)1865.273866


> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Knight [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 August 2003 18:20
> To: Stas Bekman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry
> (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...
>
>
> try
> CGI->initialize_globals();
> at the begining of the script but before you use params
>
> if you are depending on the 'use CGI' statement to initialize
> your params (like a command line script), it will cause
> problems in Registry.  Thats becuase it is initialized once on
> the initial 'use CGI' and it stays in memory for the life
> of the webserver.  So each time you use a script, you have to
> initialize the CGI params to your current request.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry
> (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...
>
>
> Steve Bannerman wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I apologize if this has already been covered...I looked at the archives
> > since May but couldn't see anything covering this (there were
> related items
> > but their solutions didn't solve this problem).
> >
> > Here an explanation of the problem:
> >
> > We want to post experiment results to an "upload server" which
> is running
> > Apache HTTP Server (2.0.46) and mod_perl (1.99_09).  When we
> post a sequence
> > of files to the server, some of them are written to the local
> disk and some
> > are not.  That is, the test fails when using ModPerl::Registry but it
> > succeeds when using ModPerl::PerlRun.
> >
> > In analyzing which ones work and which ones do not, I wrote a
> quick test to
> > see why the transfer is not working.  From the looks of the results, it
> > appears that the first request handled by a particular Apache
> process/thread
> > "works" and that any subsequent requests handled by that thread "fail."
> > Works means that the file in the test gets saved to disk and
> fail means that
> > a file of size "0" gets written to disk.
> >
> > Below are the httpd.conf segments (working and failing), the test client
> > (test_client.pl) and the test server (test_server.pl which is accessible
> > from the /cpdn/cgi-bin location).
> >
> > Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance...
> >
> > Also, does it matter if I use ModPerl::PerlRun instead of
> ModPerl::Registry
> > (I have read some about this at
> > http://apache.perl.org/docs/2.0/api/ModPerl/Registry.html but the
> > documentation there is a little light).
>
> The docs need work, this is just a copy of mp1 registry docs, which need
> adjustments. However most things work the same way. The
> differences between
> Registry and PerlRun are easily summarizes with this diff:
>
> ModPerl-Registry> diff -u lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm
> --- lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm 2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
> +++ lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm  2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -package ModPerl::Registry;
> +package ModPerl::PerlRun;
>
>   use strict;
>   use warnings FATAL => 'all';
> @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
>   make_namespace  => 'make_namespace',
>   namespace_root  => 'namespace_root',
>   namespace_from  => 'namespace_from_filename',
> -is_cached   => 'is_cached',
> -should_compile  => 'should_compile_if_modified',
> -flush_namespace => 'NOP',
> +is_cached   => 'FALSE',
> +should_compile  => 'TRUE',
> +flush_namespace => 'flush_namespace_normal',
> 

RE: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry (okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...

2003-08-06 Thread Christopher Knight
try
CGI->initialize_globals();
at the begining of the script but before you use params

if you are depending on the 'use CGI' statement to initialize your params (like a 
command line script), it will cause
problems in Registry.  Thats becuase it is initialized once on the initial 'use CGI' 
and it stays in memory for the life
of the webserver.  So each time you use a script, you have to initialize the CGI 
params to your current request.

-Original Message-
From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HTTP POST: parameters "empty" when using ModPerl::Registry
(okay when using ModPerl:PerlRun)...


Steve Bannerman wrote:
> All,
>
> I apologize if this has already been covered...I looked at the archives
> since May but couldn't see anything covering this (there were related items
> but their solutions didn't solve this problem).
>
> Here an explanation of the problem:
>
> We want to post experiment results to an "upload server" which is running
> Apache HTTP Server (2.0.46) and mod_perl (1.99_09).  When we post a sequence
> of files to the server, some of them are written to the local disk and some
> are not.  That is, the test fails when using ModPerl::Registry but it
> succeeds when using ModPerl::PerlRun.
>
> In analyzing which ones work and which ones do not, I wrote a quick test to
> see why the transfer is not working.  From the looks of the results, it
> appears that the first request handled by a particular Apache process/thread
> "works" and that any subsequent requests handled by that thread "fail."
> Works means that the file in the test gets saved to disk and fail means that
> a file of size "0" gets written to disk.
>
> Below are the httpd.conf segments (working and failing), the test client
> (test_client.pl) and the test server (test_server.pl which is accessible
> from the /cpdn/cgi-bin location).
>
> Any suggestions?  Thanks in advance...
>
> Also, does it matter if I use ModPerl::PerlRun instead of ModPerl::Registry
> (I have read some about this at
> http://apache.perl.org/docs/2.0/api/ModPerl/Registry.html but the
> documentation there is a little light).

The docs need work, this is just a copy of mp1 registry docs, which need
adjustments. However most things work the same way. The differences between
Registry and PerlRun are easily summarizes with this diff:

ModPerl-Registry> diff -u lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm
--- lib/ModPerl/Registry.pm 2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
+++ lib/ModPerl/PerlRun.pm  2003-03-22 20:52:24.0 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-package ModPerl::Registry;
+package ModPerl::PerlRun;

  use strict;
  use warnings FATAL => 'all';
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@
  make_namespace  => 'make_namespace',
  namespace_root  => 'namespace_root',
  namespace_from  => 'namespace_from_filename',
-is_cached   => 'is_cached',
-should_compile  => 'should_compile_if_modified',
-flush_namespace => 'NOP',
+is_cached   => 'FALSE',
+should_compile  => 'TRUE',
+flush_namespace => 'flush_namespace_normal',
  cache_table => 'cache_table_common',
-cache_it=> 'cache_it',
+cache_it=> 'NOP',
  read_script => 'read_script',
  rewrite_shebang => 'rewrite_shebang',
  set_script_name => 'set_script_name',
@@ -53,17 +53,10 @@

PerlRun doesn't cache the script on each request and it flushes the script's
namespace on each request. You can see the actual functions in
lib/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm. If you can try to take it from here and see
what the problem is (your code/registry?), that would be cool. Thanks.

Also make sure you are using the latest CGI.pm (2.93 or higher is good).

__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com