Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[___cliff rayman___]

the list of archives can be found on the main mod_perl page:
http://perl.apache.org/

i liks geocrawler's personally.

--
___cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.genwax.com/Issam Alameh
wrote:

> hello,does perl 5.6 supports mod_perl and Apache::ASP module?? I
> don't know if somebody has answered this question before, but I am new
> to this mailing list and I don't know from where to get the
> archives, so fogive me RegardsIssam Alameh

Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Issam Alameh]

hello,
    does perl 5.6 
supports mod_perl and Apache::ASP module?? 
 
I don't know if somebody has answered 
this question before, but I am new to this mailing list and I don't know from 
where to get the archives,
 
so fogive me
 
Regards
Issam Alameh

RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Ask Bjoern Hansen]

On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:

> Well, as I mentioned to someone else, I've been off the list for a while.
> It would have been nice if it there were something similar to what the
> Apache and Perl sites do.  IE current version is X.XX.  That way, one can
> know at a glance what the current stable version of the software is.

subscribe to the announcements only list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] where announcements are made (in
addition to on this list).

You could also have taked a look at http://perl.apache.org/dist/ ...

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - 
more than 70M impressions per day, 

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Ask Bjoern Hansen]

On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:

> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet? 

I use it for some stuff on my development box, it seems to work fine:

  http://i.valueclick.com/perl-status?myconfig

The standard recommendation is to wait a few months though (except if
you have some problems with 5.5.3 that would be solved by 5.6.0).


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - 
more than 70M impressions per day, 

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Rodney Broom \(OE\)]

- Original Message -
From: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> if you could follow the hints in the SUPPORT doc for getting a stacktrace,
> that would help a great deal.

Sure, I'll see what info I can get without tampering with current working
installations.

Rodney

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Doug MacEachern]

On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Rodney Broom (OE) wrote:
 
> U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get
> Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't get cgi or indexing
> to work. They just spit out segment fault errors.

if you could follow the hints in the SUPPORT doc for getting a stacktrace,
that would help a great deal.

RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Jeff Stuart]

Well, as I mentioned to someone else, I've been off the list for a while.
It would have been nice if it there were something similar to what the
Apache and Perl sites do.  IE current version is X.XX.  That way, one can
know at a glance what the current stable version of the software is.

--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 11:14 AM
To: Jeff Stuart
Cc: Modperl Mailing List
Subject: RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

>>>>> "JS" == Jeff Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

JS> H*LL!  I didn't even know that there WAS a mod_perl 1.22.  :( Umm,
JS> where was this announced?  It would have been nice if it were
JS> announced ON the web site!  No mention anywhere of what version is
JS> current that I could find.

It was announced on the mailing list.

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Andrew Wyllie]

Hi Jeff,

On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Jeff Stuart wrote:

> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?  If so, how did it go?
> Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl?  If so, when's the next release?  I
> hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.
> 
> --
> Jeff Stuart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


I have Apache 1.3.12, perl 5.6.0 and mod_perl-1.22 running on a FreeBSD
box.  It all compiled wiyh no problems at all and all of my code has
continuted to work as it did previously.  One caveat though, this system
is a very fresh system, ie., I just built it last weekend so I was building
everything from scratch without and old stuff hanging around.  I ran into
one problem with DBI, something about (defined @array ) being depricated,
pretty easy to fix though.



andrew

...
Andrew  Wyllie   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Open Source Integrator
v.206.729.7439  __We can catify or stringify,
c.206.851.9876separately or together!__ perl-5.005_03

RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Vivek Khera]

> "JS" == Jeff Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

JS> H*LL!  I didn't even know that there WAS a mod_perl 1.22.  :( Umm,
JS> where was this announced?  It would have been nice if it were
JS> announced ON the web site!  No mention anywhere of what version is
JS> current that I could find.

It was announced on the mailing list.

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[darren chamberlain]

lynx -dump http://localhost/perl-status :

Embedded Perl version 5.006 for Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) mod_perl/1.22 process 557, 
running since Tue Mar 28 08:32:42 2000

No problems, smooth build / install. I've been using it for a couple of days
now, and had not a single problem -- all my handlers work exactly as they did
under perl 5.005_03 / mod_perl 1.21 / Apache 1.3.11.

darren

Jeff Stuart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect:
> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?  If so, how did it go?
> Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl?  If so, when's the next release?  I
> hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.
> 
> --
> Jeff Stuart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
If God had not given us sticky tape, it would have been necessary to invent it.

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Aaron Johnson]

Jeff,

These issues are very resent in the archives of the mailing list.
Did you look there?
Did you look on CPAN for the latest copy of mod_perl?

I have mod_perl 1.22 with Apache 1.3.12 and Perl 5.6 on Linux with kernel
2.0.35 with libs that are just as old.  This includes a large number of
additional modules one of which is DBI.

I saw another post that said they were getting seg faults, that can or maybe
caused by a module other then mod_perl.  There was a strange issue with Emperl
that was causing a seg fault on the above, but the author of Embperl quickly
fixed it and it is available in CVS section of Embperl.  May want to see what
you have for handlers and run the server without them to see if it is infact a
mod_perl issue.

I am going to be duplicating on SuSE 6.3 , RH 6.1 and RH 6.0 this week.  I
will post my success stories here, if there are any. :^)

Aaron Johnson

Jeff Stuart wrote:

> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?  If so, how did it go?
> Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl?  If so, when's the next release?  I
> hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.
>
> --
> Jeff Stuart
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Jeff Stuart]

H*LL!  I didn't even know that there WAS a mod_perl 1.22.  :(  Umm, where
was this announced?  It would have been nice if it were announced ON the web
site!  No mention anywhere of what version is current that I could find.
  Oh well.  When I have the time, I guess I'll get to play with it and see
what's up.

--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Rodney Broom (OE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 1:47 AM
To: Modperl Mailing List
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?

Yes, all day.


>  If so, how did it go?

U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get
Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't get cgi or indexing
to work. They just spit out segment fault errors.

I've tried installing from the mod_perl build (1.21 and 1.22), and from CPAN
shell. I've tried with Apache 1.3.9 and 1.3.12, same thing. If I build
without mod_perl, Apache behaves just fine. I'm going to try building Apache
with mod_perl as an extra module; if that doesn't work, I'm going to
downgrade my Perl back to 5.005.

If I'm just being silly and missing something, please hollar at me!

Rodney

Re: Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Rodney Broom \(OE\)]

- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?

Yes, all day.


>  If so, how did it go?

U guess. Lots of weird little errors that I can't quite resolve. I can get
Apache installed, but if I build with mod_perl, I can't get cgi or indexing
to work. They just spit out segment fault errors.

I've tried installing from the mod_perl build (1.21 and 1.22), and from CPAN
shell. I've tried with Apache 1.3.9 and 1.3.12, same thing. If I build
without mod_perl, Apache behaves just fine. I'm going to try building Apache
with mod_perl as an extra module; if that doesn't work, I'm going to
downgrade my Perl back to 5.005.

If I'm just being silly and missing something, please hollar at me!

Rodney

Perl 5.6 and mod_perl

[Jeff Stuart]

Has anyone tried to use mod_perl with perl 5.6 yet?  If so, how did it go?
Oh, are we still at 1.21 for mod_perl?  If so, when's the next release?  I
hear that there are some important memory leak fixes in there.

--
Jeff Stuart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]