Re: Perl 6 + mod_perl

2003-06-27 Thread Kevin Falcone
 LB == Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

LB However, that said, we already have mod_parrot:

LB http://cvs.perl.org/cvsweb/mod_parrot/

Hmm, yes, and now that I've graduated, I should concentrate on making
it compile against the current incarnation of parrot.

LB I suggest concentrating on mod_perl2 instead for now ;-)

Agreed, but that won't keep me from playing.

-kevin


Re: Perl 6 + mod_perl

2003-06-20 Thread Leon Brocard
Nigel Hamilton sent the following bits through the ether:

   While reading this section I wondered how Parrot would fit 
 into the interpreter pool scheme available in mp2? Has anyone got any 
 theories on how Perl 6 and mod_perl may merge in the future?

This is a little speculative as Parrot doesn't really have decent IO
and Perl 6 is a couple of years off. However, that said, we already
have mod_parrot:

http://cvs.perl.org/cvsweb/mod_parrot/

I suggest concentrating on mod_perl2 instead for now ;-)

Leon
-- 
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
scribot.http://www.scribot.com/

... I'd love to go out with you, but I have to floss my cat


Perl 6 + mod_perl

2003-06-18 Thread Nigel Hamilton
Hi,

I've just been reading Stas + Eric's new book - it looks great - 
well done to everyone involved!

The Apache 2.0, mp2 section is really interesting and when things 
stabilise here at turbo10.com we will change over to it in production.

While reading this section I wondered how Parrot would fit 
into the interpreter pool scheme available in mp2? Has anyone got any 
theories on how Perl 6 and mod_perl may merge in the future?

Or will Perl 6 Web Applications go down the Java track and execute 
in JBoss-esque application servers?

 I know this is really speculative but I think it would be fun to 
discuss 


NIge

-- 
Nigel Hamilton
Turbo10 Metasearch Engine

email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+44 (0) 207 987 5460
fax:+44 (0) 207 987 5468

http://turbo10.com  Search Deeper. Browse Faster.