RE: push_handlers question
-Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 11:59 PM Cc: modperl Subject: push_handlers question I am trying to sub class Apache::AuthCookieURL and would like to use $r-push_handlers(PerlAuthenHandler = My::Class-authenticate); the push_handler is set in a handler called from httpd.conf on the PerlInitHandler phase but the authenticate routine does not seem to be getting the apache request object passed to it as I get a can't call dir_config on an udefined value error. my $r = Apache-request; HTH --Geoff I'm sure I am missing something simple but can someone point it out to me. Thanks
Re: push_handlers question
Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is why is the request object passed if I call the module directly from http.conf and not when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not functionally equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in httpd.conf. Mike Geoffrey Young wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 11:59 PM Cc: modperl Subject: push_handlers question I am trying to sub class Apache::AuthCookieURL and would like to use $r-push_handlers(PerlAuthenHandler = My::Class-authenticate); the push_handler is set in a handler called from httpd.conf on the PerlInitHandler phase but the authenticate routine does not seem to be getting the apache request object passed to it as I get a can't call dir_config on an udefined value error. my $r = Apache-request; HTH --Geoff I'm sure I am missing something simple but can someone point it out to me. Thanks
RE: push_handlers question
-Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:18 AM Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: push_handlers question Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is why is the request object passed if I call the module directly from http.conf and not when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not functionally equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in httpd.conf. according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method handlers do not get the request object passed to them - Andrew suggests using a closure for this. Apache-request should work fine as well. HTH --Geoff Mike Geoffrey Young wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 11:59 PM Cc: modperl Subject: push_handlers question I am trying to sub class Apache::AuthCookieURL and would like to use $r-push_handlers(PerlAuthenHandler = My::Class-authenticate); the push_handler is set in a handler called from httpd.conf on the PerlInitHandler phase but the authenticate routine does not seem to be getting the apache request object passed to it as I get a can't call dir_config on an udefined value error. my $r = Apache-request; HTH --Geoff I'm sure I am missing something simple but can someone point it out to me. Thanks
RE: push_handlers question
-Original Message- From: Geoffrey Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 9:58 AM To: 'Mike Cameron' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: push_handlers question -Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:18 AM Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: push_handlers question Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is why is the request object passed if I call the module directly from http.conf and not when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not functionally equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in httpd.conf. according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method handlers do not get the request object passed to them I should have said method handlers that are set up via push_handlers() don't have the request object passed to them. for normal method handlers, $self = shift; $r = shift; works just fine. hopefully everyone understood that :) --Geoff - Andrew suggests using a closure for this. Apache-request should work fine as well. HTH --Geoff Mike Geoffrey Young wrote: -Original Message- From: Mike Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 11:59 PM Cc: modperl Subject: push_handlers question I am trying to sub class Apache::AuthCookieURL and would like to use $r-push_handlers(PerlAuthenHandler = My::Class-authenticate); the push_handler is set in a handler called from httpd.conf on the PerlInitHandler phase but the authenticate routine does not seem to be getting the apache request object passed to it as I get a can't call dir_config on an udefined value error. my $r = Apache-request; HTH --Geoff I'm sure I am missing something simple but can someone point it out to me. Thanks
RE: push_handlers question
At 10:36 AM -0500 3/5/01, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is
why is the
request object passed if I call the module directly from
http.conf and not
when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not
functionally
equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in
httpd.conf.
according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method
handlers do not get
the request object passed to them
I should have said method handlers that are set up via push_handlers() don't
have the request object passed to them.
for normal method handlers,
$self = shift;
$r = shift;
Couldn't you fake it?
$r-push_handlers(
PerlHandler = sub{ unshift @_, Apache-request; goto real_handler; }
);
Robert Landrum
[snip]
--
"Will hack Perl for food."
RE: push_handlers question
-Original Message-
From: Robert Landrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Geoffrey Young; 'Mike Cameron'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: push_handlers question
At 10:36 AM -0500 3/5/01, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is
why is the
request object passed if I call the module directly from
http.conf and not
when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not
functionally
equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in
httpd.conf.
according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method
handlers do not get
the request object passed to them
I should have said method handlers that are set up via
push_handlers() don't
have the request object passed to them.
for normal method handlers,
$self = shift;
$r = shift;
Couldn't you fake it?
$r-push_handlers(
PerlHandler = sub{ unshift @_, Apache-request; goto
real_handler; }
);
there's always more than one way :)
--Geoff
Robert Landrum
[snip]
--
"Will hack Perl for food."
Re: push_handlers question
Thanks all. My real question was not so much HOW to fix but more WHY do
i need to fix. I did not realize that using push_handlers would not
send the Apache request to the method handler.
Geoffrey Young wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Landrum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:19 AM
To: Geoffrey Young; 'Mike Cameron'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: push_handlers question
At 10:36 AM -0500 3/5/01, Geoffrey Young wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but what i really want to know is
why is the
request object passed if I call the module directly from
http.conf and not
when I use the push handlers method? Are the two methods not
functionally
equivalent? Everything works fine when the handler is set in
httpd.conf.
according to the mod_perl pocket reference (p20) method
handlers do not get
the request object passed to them
I should have said method handlers that are set up via
push_handlers() don't
have the request object passed to them.
for normal method handlers,
$self = shift;
$r = shift;
Couldn't you fake it?
$r-push_handlers(
PerlHandler = sub{ unshift @_, Apache-request; goto
real_handler; }
);
there's always more than one way :)
--Geoff
Robert Landrum
[snip]
--
"Will hack Perl for food."
