Re: Apache::AuthCookie takeover?

2000-01-26 Thread Doug MacEachern

On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Ken Williams wrote:
 
 Can someone set the maintainer of Apache::AuthCookie to be me?

patch below :)
thanks Ken!!

diff -u -u -r1.63 apache-modlist.html
--- apache-modlist.html 1999/11/24 02:40:01 1.63
+++ apache-modlist.html 2000/01/27 05:19:27
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
 * PerlAuthenHandler's
 AuthAnybdpfAuthenticate with any username/password
MPB
 AuthenCachebmpfCache authentication credentialsJBODNAR
-AuthCookie bdpOAuthen + Authz via cookies  EBARTLEY
+AuthCookie bdpOAuthen + Authz via cookies  KWILLIAM
 AuthenDBI  bmpOAuthenticate via Perl's DBI MERGL
 AuthExpire i   Expire Basic auth credentials   DOUGM
 AuthenGSS  cdpfGeneric Security Service (RFC 2078) DOUGM




Re: Apache::AuthCookie takeover?

2000-01-25 Thread Adam Mackler


I've been using Apache::AuthCookie, and it's great, but just from
playing with it briefly I see some apparent issues.  For one thing
I didn't find an obvious way to delete a session from the database.
It relies on the browser to delete the session key cookie.  Right now,
my MSIE is not deleting that cookie for some reason, while Netscape is,
so I can't "log out" using MSIE.

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this or if there's some easy
way to fix it, but I want to use this in a production environment.
Unless someone else is working on this, I'll have to fix it somehow,
whether or not it's code anyone else would dare run on their server.

I'm also wondering how possible it would be to add an option to use
the browser's "basic" login dialog box instead of having to create an 
HTML page for it.  It's something else I'm thinking of trying to do,
but again I'd like to know if anyone else is either working on it or
knows some reason not to.

This module seems to be a tremendously useful tool for any site that
needs authentication.  Its next maintainer will earn my gratitude and
whatever asistance I'm capable of.

Adam



On Jan 24 Bruce W. Hoylman wrote

 "Ken" == Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 make a new module with a new name, since some of my changes have
 changed the interface, or usurp the Apache::AuthCookie module and
 provide a clear stepwise migration path? Doug said he'd be willing
 to make me the maintainer.

My vote is for 'usurption'. I use this module alot and I too have seen
the need for changes. I think it best to go forward with the current
module and namespace conventions for continuity at my site.

You do good work, Ken. I look forward to seeing what you have done with
this very useful module.

Peace.



Re: Apache::AuthCookie takeover?

2000-01-25 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen

On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Ken Williams wrote:

   * make a new module with a new name, since some of my changes have changed 
 the interface, or
   * usurp the Apache::AuthCookie module and provide a clear stepwise migration 
 path?  Doug said he'd be willing to make me the maintainer.

The last. Much better than leaving a module around not to be maintained.

If the interface haven't changed too much you might even be able to do
some backwards compatibility thing.


 - ask

-- 
ask bjoern hansen - http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/
more than 60M impressions per day, http://valueclick.com