Re: pod files

2003-08-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:48, Stas Bekman wrote:

ColinB wrote:

A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files

cgi_to_mod_perl.pod
mod_perl.pod
mod_perl_tuning.pod
these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than 
in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?).


Last modified on : 2000/11/25 by stas himself ;-)

If you say they should be forcibly deprecated, no problem.
Yup, we could move the old docs into some dir on perl.apache.org if someone 
feels that they are still needed. in any case they are in the cvs, so one can 
always retrieve them if needed.

A quick grep showed that those documents are still refered to:

cgi_to_mod_perl.pod:
 INSTALL.win32
 SUPPORT
should be removed from there

mod_perl.pod:
 faq/mod_perl_cgi.pod
 faq/mod_perl_faq.pod
neither these files are needed and should be removed

if we want to distribute docs, we need to put modperl-docs/src/docs/1.0/guide 
= modperl/docs just like we have in modperl-2.0. This can be arranged to 
happen on checkout.

But if this info has all moved to perl.apache.org, I don't see why I
can't remove those, and update the documentation referring to.
If nobody objects, I'll be changing it tomorrow.
Thanks gozer.

__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com


--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html


Re: pod files

2003-08-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:48, Stas Bekman wrote:
 ColinB wrote:
  A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files
  
  cgi_to_mod_perl.pod
  mod_perl.pod
  mod_perl_tuning.pod
 
 these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than 
 in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?).

Last modified on : 2000/11/25 by stas himself ;-)

If you say they should be forcibly deprecated, no problem.

A quick grep showed that those documents are still refered to:

cgi_to_mod_perl.pod:
 INSTALL.win32
 SUPPORT

mod_perl.pod:
 faq/mod_perl_cgi.pod
 faq/mod_perl_faq.pod


But if this info has all moved to perl.apache.org, I don't see why I
can't remove those, and update the documentation referring to.

If nobody objects, I'll be changing it tomorrow.

Gozer out.

  which were supplied with mod_perl 1 are missing from mod_perl 2
  (perhaps because they need re-writing?)
 
 They were integrated into the docs at perl.apache.org about 3-4 years ago.
 
  Is it indended to include these in the final mod_perl 2 release?
 
 mod_perl 2.0 comes with its own docs in the docs/ dir.
 
 __
 Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
 http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
 http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com
 
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: pod files

2003-08-14 Thread Stas Bekman
ColinB wrote:
A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files

cgi_to_mod_perl.pod
mod_perl.pod
mod_perl_tuning.pod
these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than 
in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?).

which were supplied with mod_perl 1 are missing from mod_perl 2
(perhaps because they need re-writing?)
They were integrated into the docs at perl.apache.org about 3-4 years ago.

Is it indended to include these in the final mod_perl 2 release?
mod_perl 2.0 comes with its own docs in the docs/ dir.

__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide --- http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com