Re: pod files
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:48, Stas Bekman wrote: ColinB wrote: A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files cgi_to_mod_perl.pod mod_perl.pod mod_perl_tuning.pod these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?). Last modified on : 2000/11/25 by stas himself ;-) If you say they should be forcibly deprecated, no problem. Yup, we could move the old docs into some dir on perl.apache.org if someone feels that they are still needed. in any case they are in the cvs, so one can always retrieve them if needed. A quick grep showed that those documents are still refered to: cgi_to_mod_perl.pod: INSTALL.win32 SUPPORT should be removed from there mod_perl.pod: faq/mod_perl_cgi.pod faq/mod_perl_faq.pod neither these files are needed and should be removed if we want to distribute docs, we need to put modperl-docs/src/docs/1.0/guide => modperl/docs just like we have in modperl-2.0. This can be arranged to happen on checkout. But if this info has all moved to perl.apache.org, I don't see why I can't remove those, and update the documentation referring to. If nobody objects, I'll be changing it tomorrow. Thanks gozer. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
Re: pod files
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 09:48, Stas Bekman wrote: > ColinB wrote: > > A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files > > > > cgi_to_mod_perl.pod > > mod_perl.pod > > mod_perl_tuning.pod > > these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than > in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?). Last modified on : 2000/11/25 by stas himself ;-) If you say they should be forcibly deprecated, no problem. A quick grep showed that those documents are still refered to: cgi_to_mod_perl.pod: INSTALL.win32 SUPPORT mod_perl.pod: faq/mod_perl_cgi.pod faq/mod_perl_faq.pod But if this info has all moved to perl.apache.org, I don't see why I can't remove those, and update the documentation referring to. If nobody objects, I'll be changing it tomorrow. Gozer out. > > which were supplied with mod_perl 1 are missing from mod_perl 2 > > (perhaps because they need re-writing?) > > They were integrated into the docs at perl.apache.org about 3-4 years ago. > > > Is it indended to include these in the final mod_perl 2 release? > > mod_perl 2.0 comes with its own docs in the docs/ dir. > > __ > Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker > http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com > http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com > > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: pod files
ColinB wrote: A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files cgi_to_mod_perl.pod mod_perl.pod mod_perl_tuning.pod these files are a history and they don't really exist any longer, other than in the distibution (should probably be removed, Philippe?). which were supplied with mod_perl 1 are missing from mod_perl 2 (perhaps because they need re-writing?) They were integrated into the docs at perl.apache.org about 3-4 years ago. Is it indended to include these in the final mod_perl 2 release? mod_perl 2.0 comes with its own docs in the docs/ dir. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
pod files
A relatively trivial point, but I notice that the pod files cgi_to_mod_perl.pod mod_perl.pod mod_perl_tuning.pod which were supplied with mod_perl 1 are missing from mod_perl 2 (perhaps because they need re-writing?) Is it indended to include these in the final mod_perl 2 release? Thanks Colin __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com