Thanks for the feedback. I will use Win32::Automate::<app> and I encourage others to use the same pattern in the future.
Chris
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, at 06:56 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
The Win32:: namspace is also quite established to applications specific to
that platform so if the underlying application is Windows specific
I think using Win32:: would be a good idea.
I'd understand more something like Win32::Automate::<app> or Win32::Drive::<app>.
less than 2c. Gabor
-- Chris Dolan, Software Developer, Clotho Advanced Media Inc. 608-294-7900, 211 S Paterson Suite 260, Madison WI 53703
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
