Re: (resend) RE: mod_ssl

2007-12-14 Thread Mads Toftum
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:46PM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote:
 I am attempting to upgrade httpd from 1.3.x to 2.2.x for our web
 application. I have managed to get everything building and working,
 
...

 As you can see, the call from mod_ssl.so into the buckets/ code is
 passing a null pointer. None of our other modules have been modified to
 use buckets. Does mod_ssl require the use of buckets?
  
Are you trying to port mod_ssl from 1.3.x to 2.2.x?
That's been done long ago and 2.x includes a port of mod_ssl.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://soulfood.dk


RE: (resend) RE: mod_ssl

2007-12-14 Thread Hammer, Tim

 On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:50:46PM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote:
  I am attempting to upgrade httpd from 1.3.x to 2.2.x for our web 
  application. I have managed to get everything building and working,
  
 ...
 
  As you can see, the call from mod_ssl.so into the buckets/ code is 
  passing a null pointer. None of our other modules have been 
 modified 
  to use buckets. Does mod_ssl require the use of buckets?
   
 Are you trying to port mod_ssl from 1.3.x to 2.2.x?
 That's been done long ago and 2.x includes a port of mod_ssl.

No, I am trying to use the new (2.2.x) mod_ssl with our modules that
have been ported from 1.3.x to 2.2.x. However, the port did not
convert our modules to use buckets and I am wondering if the new mod_ssl
is requiring the content generator(s) (our modules) to have created a
brigade.

 
 vh
 
 Mads Toftum


.Tim
Xerox Corporation, Office Group

Phone: 585/427-1684
Fax: 585/427-3244
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Addr:  M/S 0801-80A
   1350 Jefferson Road
   Rochester, NY  14623
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient(s) please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Thank you.


Re: (resend) RE: mod_ssl

2007-12-14 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:01:09AM -0500, Hammer, Tim wrote:
 No, I am trying to use the new (2.2.x) mod_ssl with our modules that
 have been ported from 1.3.x to 2.2.x. However, the port did not
 convert our modules to use buckets and I am wondering if the new mod_ssl
 is requiring the content generator(s) (our modules) to have created a
 brigade.
 
Ah. And everything works when mod_ssl is left out?

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://soulfood.dk