Re: [Mono-dev] Gtk# 2.x release status and thoughts on 3.0

2009-05-28 Thread Vladimir Giszpenc
 With the gtk+ 3.0 release planned in the next year, we have therefore
 decided to hold the 2.x release series of Gtk# at the 2.12 API version,
 and we plan to switch trunk from its current 2.14 target over to 3.0
 when the gtk+ team gets closer to releasing.

Is there any chance of migrating to a .Net 2.0 code base?  Generics alone
should be reason enough for moving to a 2.0 only codebase.

Depending on the status/licensing of the ParallelFx stuff and the co/contra
variant mess, it might even make sense to discuss the possibility of a newer
dependency like 4.0.

Can you make a call for all Mono consumers that want Gtk# to stay on the 1.1
profile so we can see what the obstacles are?

Thanks,

Vlad


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Gtk# 2.x release status and thoughts on 3.0

2009-05-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello,

 Is there any chance of migrating to a .Net 2.0 code base?  Generics alone
 should be reason enough for moving to a 2.0 only codebase.

Requiring generics for Gtk# 3.0 makes sense.

 Depending on the status/licensing of the ParallelFx stuff and the co/contra
 variant mess, it might even make sense to discuss the possibility of a newer
 dependency like 4.0.

Too early to take a dependency on .NET 4.0


___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list