Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-13 Thread Angel Marin
Michael Schurter escribió:
 Steve Deobald wrote:
 It's also Windows-only and uses a proprietary RAR plugin, as far as I know.
 
 7-zip is very much cross-platform compatible.  NSIS uses it (and it 
 works in Linux), and Debian even has packages for it in Etch.

Well that's p7zip[1] not 7-zip :)

 7z, as well as a number of other open source tools, can decompress RAR 
 archives.  I believe there are patents or some such nonsense preventing 
 open source RAR implementations.

7z has it's own 7z format [2] which is open and performs much better 
than zip (today's mono-1.2.20061113.zip is 31MB while with 7z default 
options it's only 13MB).

Though it's not probably the best format (neither is rar) for this task 
as p7zip may not be widespread enough.

[1] - http://p7zip.sourceforge.net/
[2] - http://7-zip.org/7z.html

Regards,
-- 
Angel Marin
http://anmar.eu.org/

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-13 Thread Atsushi Eno
Guys, I don't think we are interested in which compression format
is most efficient for compression. Only popular, *really* popular
ones such as tar.gz, tar.bz2 or zip would be the choice(s).

(What I practically mean is, it is being so off-topic.)

Atsushi Eno

Angel Marin wrote:
 Michael Schurter escribió:
 Steve Deobald wrote:
 It's also Windows-only and uses a proprietary RAR plugin, as far as I know.
 7-zip is very much cross-platform compatible.  NSIS uses it (and it 
 works in Linux), and Debian even has packages for it in Etch.
 
 Well that's p7zip[1] not 7-zip :)
 
 7z, as well as a number of other open source tools, can decompress RAR 
 archives.  I believe there are patents or some such nonsense preventing 
 open source RAR implementations.
 
 7z has it's own 7z format [2] which is open and performs much better 
 than zip (today's mono-1.2.20061113.zip is 31MB while with 7z default 
 options it's only 13MB).
 
 Though it's not probably the best format (neither is rar) for this task 
 as p7zip may not be widespread enough.
 
 [1] - http://p7zip.sourceforge.net/
 [2] - http://7-zip.org/7z.html
 
 Regards,

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-13 Thread Wade Berrier
Raja has fixed the files that were causing the issues with 'make dist',
so I've reverted back to using 'make dist' instead of 'make dist-zip'.

Wade

On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 13:06 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Several have reported that the tarballs available from
 mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable.
 
 This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using.  We
 must use this limited format to support some older distros.
 
 To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the source
 distribution instead.  (This is created by running make dist-zip instead
 of make dist).
 
 monolite and monocharger will remain in tar.gz format, but the source
 download is in .zip format.
 
 Wade
-- 
Wade Berrier
Mono Team
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
801-861-5132

Novell, Inc. 
SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10
Your Linux is ready 
http://www.novell.com/linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-12 Thread Steve Deobald
Rar isn't very free software friendly.

On 11/10/06, John Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wade Berrier wrote:

   Hi,
  
   Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :(
  

 Have you tried rar?



 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list



___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-12 Thread Michael Schurter
Steve Deobald wrote:
 Rar isn't very free software friendly.

7-zip is, but its not very widespread yet.
http://7-zip.org/
-- 
Michael Schurter
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-12 Thread Steve Deobald
It's also Windows-only and uses a proprietary RAR plugin, as far as I know.

On 11/12/06, Michael Schurter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Steve Deobald wrote:
  Rar isn't very free software friendly.

 7-zip is, but its not very widespread yet.
 http://7-zip.org/
 --
 Michael Schurter
 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-12 Thread Michael Schurter
Steve Deobald wrote:
 It's also Windows-only and uses a proprietary RAR plugin, as far as I know.

7-zip is very much cross-platform compatible.  NSIS uses it (and it 
works in Linux), and Debian even has packages for it in Etch.

7z, as well as a number of other open source tools, can decompress RAR 
archives.  I believe there are patents or some such nonsense preventing 
open source RAR implementations.

However, like I said: 7z isn't very widespread so probably not an 
option.  I find it hard to believe that there isn't some tar format that 
works considering how universal tar is.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi,

I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at 
compression. How was the difference?

Atsushi Eno

Wade Berrier wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Several have reported that the tarballs available from
 mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable.
 
 This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using.  We
 must use this limited format to support some older distros.
 
 To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the source
 distribution instead.  (This is created by running make dist-zip instead
 of make dist).
 
 monolite and monocharger will remain in tar.gz format, but the source
 download is in .zip format.
 
 Wade
 
 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread Wade Berrier
Hi,

Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :(

Wade

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 06:24 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at 
 compression. How was the difference?
 
 Atsushi Eno
 
 Wade Berrier wrote:
  Hi,
  
  Several have reported that the tarballs available from
  mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable.
  
  This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using.  We
  must use this limited format to support some older distros.
  
  To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the source
  distribution instead.  (This is created by running make dist-zip instead
  of make dist).
  
  monolite and monocharger will remain in tar.gz format, but the source
  download is in .zip format.
  
  Wade
  
  ___
  Mono-devel-list mailing list
  Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
  http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
  
 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hmm... is it difficult to produce both zip and tar.gz (or.bz2) ?

Atsushi Eno

Wade Berrier wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :(
 
 Wade
 
 On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 06:24 +0900, Atsushi Eno wrote:
 Hi,

 I think zip archive for text files is much worse than tgz at 
 compression. How was the difference?

 Atsushi Eno

 Wade Berrier wrote:
 Hi,

 Several have reported that the tarballs available from
 mono.ximian.com/daily are not buildable.

 This is caused by some limitations of the tar format we're using.  We
 must use this limited format to support some older distros.

 To alleviate this I've begun to use the zip file format for the source
 distribution instead.  (This is created by running make dist-zip instead
 of make dist).

 monolite and monocharger will remain in tar.gz format, but the source
 download is in .zip format.

 Wade

 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

 
 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Mono Daily Downloads

2006-11-10 Thread John Anderson
Wade Berrier wrote: Hi, Yes, it is much worse... 20MB to 32MB :(
Have you tried rar? 
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list