RE: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support
Ok, I understand. I should have written managed "ICU" ;) I understand that this is a new mono implementation of collation for globalization features. So, mono will abandon icu4c, somewhere in the nearest future? rafi -Original Message- From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:45 PM To: Rafael Mizrahi Cc: Ilya Kharmatsky; mono-devel mailing list Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-) Atsushi Eno Rafael Mizrahi wrote: > Atsushi, > WOW, managed ICU, > Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU > implementation ? > > rafi > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi > Eno > Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM > To: Ilya Kharmatsky > Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list > Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation > (CompareInfo) support > > Hi Ilya, > > >>Great news! Thank you! > > > Thank you too, for all your help on it :-) > > >>Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare > > results > >>to >>"old" and may be MS.Net performance results? > > > Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono, > but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will > have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is > what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code. > > But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and > managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get > icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the > latest code works fine). > > Atsushi Eno > > ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support
No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-) Atsushi Eno Rafael Mizrahi wrote: Atsushi, WOW, managed ICU, Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU implementation ? rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM To: Ilya Kharmatsky Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support Hi Ilya, Great news! Thank you! Thank you too, for all your help on it :-) Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare results to "old" and may be MS.Net performance results? Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono, but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code. But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the latest code works fine). Atsushi Eno ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
RE: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support
Atsushi, WOW, managed ICU, Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU implementation ? rafi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM To: Ilya Kharmatsky Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support Hi Ilya, > Great news! Thank you! Thank you too, for all your help on it :-) > Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare results > to > "old" and may be MS.Net performance results? Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono, but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code. But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the latest code works fine). Atsushi Eno ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
