Re: [Mono-dev] explicit conversion to bool and bool? on XElement
Hello,
I don't see such a problem.
$ cat x.cs
using System;
using System.Xml.Linq;
public class Test
{
public static void Main ()
{
XName n = XName.Get (x);
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, true));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, True));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, false));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, False));
}
}
$ gmcs x.cs -r:System.Xml.Linq.dll
$ ./x.exe
True
True
False
False
$ mono ./x.exe
True
True
False
False
Atsushi Eno
On 2010/07/15 5:53, David Mitchell wrote:
Currently (or at least as of revision 147679), the explicit conversion to
bool for XElement calls System.Xml.XmlConvert.ToBoolean(), which is case
sensitive. However, Microsoft's implementation of the explicit conversion is
case insensitive.
Attached is a patch that corrects this issue by converting the convent of the
XElement to lower case before sending it to XmlConvert.ToBoolean().
I would very much appreciate it if someone would review/apply this patch (or
fix the issue in some other way).
Thanks!
-- Dave
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] explicit conversion to bool and bool? on XElement
It seems that it's been fixed on a more recent revision. Apologies
-- Dave (on the iPhone)
On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Atsushi Eno
atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't see such a problem.
$ cat x.cs
using System;
using System.Xml.Linq;
public class Test
{
public static void Main ()
{
XName n = XName.Get (x);
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, true));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, True));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, false));
Console.WriteLine ((bool?) new XElement (n, False));
}
}
$ gmcs x.cs -r:System.Xml.Linq.dll
$ ./x.exe
True
True
False
False
$ mono ./x.exe
True
True
False
False
Atsushi Eno
On 2010/07/15 5:53, David Mitchell wrote:
Currently (or at least as of revision 147679), the explicit conversion to
bool for XElement calls System.Xml.XmlConvert.ToBoolean(), which is case
sensitive. However, Microsoft's implementation of the explicit conversion is
case insensitive.
Attached is a patch that corrects this issue by converting the convent of
the XElement to lower case before sending it to XmlConvert.ToBoolean().
I would very much appreciate it if someone would review/apply this patch (or
fix the issue in some other way).
Thanks!
-- Dave
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] Make mono_dl_register_library into a fallback
On 07/13/10 Miguel de Icaza wrote: typedef void* (*MonoDlFallbackLoad) (const char *name, int flags, char **err, void *user_data); typedef void* (*MonoDlFallbackSymbol) (void *handle, const char *name, char **err, void *user_data); typedef void* (*MonoDlFallbackClose) (void *handle, void *user_data); void mono_dl_register_fallback (MonoDlFallbackLoad load_func, MonoDlFallbackSymbol symbol_func, MonoDlFallbackClose close_func, void *user_data); The old interface could be easily implemented on top of this new one (though we likely could drop it as well). This implements the suggested API based on Michael's patch. I still kept the mono_dl_register as we are now using in 4 different ports and we have a bunch of different tools generating that output as well as having pointed third parties to this API. As I said, if the tables are generated by tools, they could be easily changed to use the new API. As for other uses: I don't think we should promote the use of an inefficient API especially since the primary use would be in embedded systems where startup time and memory usage are important (the array is unsorted, so the search is linear, it is memory inefficient since the string pointer array uses more space than needed and on some systems it causes runtime relocations). Sure, if we're dealing with 10 entry points it's a non issue, but I know that in the end this will be used for huge APIs like OpenGL etc (the fact you're talking about tools generating the data hints that there are going to be lots of entries). Index: mono-dl.c === --- mono-dl.c (revision 160304) +++ mono-dl.c (working copy) +MonoDlMapping * +dl_mapping_open (const char *file); + +void * +dl_mapping_symbol (void *handle, const char *symbol); + +char * +dl_mapping_error (void); + These declarations do not belong here and should be removed, the rest looks fine. lupus -- - lu...@debian.org debian/rules lu...@ximian.com Monkeys do it better ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Mono API: field type attributes
Hello, This is my first mail here. I'm David Yuste, I'm working in the gcc branch gcc4cli. The whole project also includes a GCC front-end for CLI, which uses the Mono parser. The front end interacts with Mono through the Mono API. The problem that I have is that I need to check whether a field is declared as 'static' or not, given a MonoClassField pointer. Inside Mono, it can be done just by checking 'field-type-attrs FIELD_ATTRIBUTE_STATIC', but this is not possible using the API. I've been looking for some function providing such information, but I didn't found any way. Do you have any suggestion? Thanks, David ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Mono API: field type attributes
On 15.07.2010 16:55, David Yuste wrote: Hello, This is my first mail here. I'm David Yuste, I'm working in the gcc branch gcc4cli. The whole project also includes a GCC front-end for CLI, which uses the Mono parser. The front end interacts with Mono through the Mono API. The problem that I have is that I need to check whether a field is declared as 'static' or not, given a MonoClassField pointer. Inside Mono, it can be done just by checking 'field-type-attrs FIELD_ATTRIBUTE_STATIC', but this is not possible using the API. I've been looking for some function providing such information, but I didn't found any way. Do you have any suggestion? mono_field_get_flags (). MonoClassField *field = ... int flags = mono_field_get_flags (field); if (flags MONO_FIELD_ATTR_STATIC) Robert ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Visual Studio Projects Upgrade
What if someone wants to create a GTK# App on Windows? Will this Gtk# app work with eglib instead of glib? --- On Wed, 7/14/10, Jonathan Chambers jonc...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jonathan Chambers jonc...@gmail.com Subject: [Mono-dev] Visual Studio Projects Upgrade To: mono-devel-list mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 7:16 PM Hello All, I was planning on upgrading the runtime .sln/.vcproj files in svn to Visual Studio 2010. I was also planning on removing the older versions (2005 2008). I am not sure if 2005 is buildable at this point anyway. VS2010 supports native multi-targeting, meaning one can target the 2008 C-runtimes even when building in 2010. Mixing C-runtimes is a common cause of concern on windows and was a partial reason for trying to maintain multiple VS files. Unless anyone objects in the next few days, I'll upgrade the files. I'll also make the default build use eglib rather than glib. Thanks, Jonathan -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Visual Studio Projects Upgrade
On 15.07.2010 23:02, Daniel Morgan wrote: What if someone wants to create a GTK# App on Windows? Will this Gtk# app work with eglib instead of glib? It will work because EGLib does not interfere with GLib. Robert --- On Wed, 7/14/10, Jonathan Chambersjonc...@gmail.com wrote: From: Jonathan Chambersjonc...@gmail.com Subject: [Mono-dev] Visual Studio Projects Upgrade To: mono-devel-listmono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 7:16 PM Hello All, I was planning on upgrading the runtime .sln/.vcproj files in svn to Visual Studio 2010. I was also planning on removing the older versions (2005 2008). I am not sure if 2005 is buildable at this point anyway. VS2010 supports native multi-targeting, meaning one can target the 2008 C-runtimes even when building in 2010. Mixing C-runtimes is a common cause of concern on windows and was a partial reason for trying to maintain multiple VS files. Unless anyone objects in the next few days, I'll upgrade the files. I'll also make the default build use eglib rather than glib. Thanks, Jonathan -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-list] moonlight key focus (abort) in browser [flash has same issue]
Now that I am using moonlight more often (and flash has this problem, but I turn off flash alot now), I hate the issue of it stealing all key presses, so browser key short cuts don't work. I can understand that its important to offer up as many keys to the moonlight plugin as possible, but is there not some kind of combination (or custom pick for it in moonlight [right click settings]) that one could have browser get back focus? How about ctrl-alt-^ ? or maybe two odd key codes back to back ctrl-z ctrl-z breaks it out? This of course assumes there isn't already a way? But googling (against this annoyance in flash) didn't provide any answers, so I wouldn't be suprized if there isn't currently a focus breakout for moonlight. Not sure if there is a way in silverlight for IE in Windows (not that I need that, but if it did exist, use same in linux world with moonlight). -- ted leslie tles...@tcn.net ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
