Re: [Mono-list] casting reference arguments

2004-07-29 Thread Black Fox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

 so a check against the microsoft compiler is necessary.

Building this code on Microsoft compiler report this error :

Main.cs(28,19): error CS1510: A ref or out argument must be an lvalue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBCWCGLcKrfGI7n3QRAsGDAJ4iv4lsz/2YiwW+U3MhucHGNmD3ZQCcDuza
mCkahE0qJiXdYZIaQaKiah0=
=jNJc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Assembly.CodeBase

2004-06-07 Thread Black Fox
Doens't MS.NET code have an extra '/' afer 'file:' ? I need to isolate
the URL from the CodeBase, and this way I can't have a way that works
everywhere. Because Linux I have to remove `file://`, and in win
`file:///`.
For windows the file:/// is normal, protocol://server/path there is no 
server so the adress begin with file:///.
For linux i don't know.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] webservices / error401 / credentials / modmono

2004-06-07 Thread Black Fox
KiOrKY said the following:
Is the IIS configured to use Basic Authentication or the windows
integrated authentication?  If the latter I think you will find it will
work if you use the former.
i had tried both. Whats Former?
Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=former*2+0
Sa phrase se traduit ainsi : Si tu utilise la seconde méthode je pense 
que tu t'appercevras que ça fonctionne avec le première.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] mcs + CP1251

2004-05-27 Thread Black Fox
The file you attached is encoded with Little-endian UTF-16 Unicode and
has no markers, so gedit/gvim cannot edit it and mcs cannot read it.
And Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 Hang when i click on him...
I need to see in Mozilla Bugzilla if this bug is known. (Aplication 
should display error on attachment impossible to open, not hang)
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] using xml classes

2004-05-27 Thread Black Fox
I need to use or inherit from a class similar to the XmlElement class 
found in the System.Xml namespace. But since it is made as /internal/ i 
cannot use it (i.e inherit from it). Is there a way for me to download 
this file from mono and use it?
Mono is Open Source software, source code is in CVS or here : 
http://go-mono.com/download.html for releases (Beta1 is the last one)
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] New Windows installer from Mono CVS (mono-0.91.99-win32-4.exe)

2004-05-27 Thread Black Fox
 If you want to have the installer
translated into your language, drop me an email and i'll send you the
file with the strings to translate (just 6 or 7, don't be afraid).
Could i have them please ? I will try to translate them to french.
Sorry for sending to the list and not in private but it return that :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: unknown user: gonzalo.lists
And i don't want to test [EMAIL PROTECTED] as it could be another person.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Monio Bets1 Testing on Mandrake 9.2

2004-05-27 Thread Black Fox
Tracy Barlow said the following:
I downloaded the source for Mono Runtime 0.91 (mono-0.91.tar.gz)  from 
http://www.go-mono.com/download.html, and built it, but it makes no 
difference.
Build from source mean i think build from CVS as 0.91 is Beta1 version 
and the patch is post-Beta1.

And also i don't known where the bug was (Runtime or classes libraries 
so don't build only the runtime)
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Re: Mono-list digest, Vol 1 #1730 - 12 msgs

2004-05-27 Thread Black Fox
Note: Sorry for sending an unfinished version of this mail, i have hit 
the bad key.

I know that the real solution is for the vm engines to allow the code to
deployed pre-compiled. But they do not allow that because of safety reasons.
Besides its a war against closed source, but I personally wouldn't mind my
company makes everything opensource.
Pre-compiled things is a big regression from VMs. And 
reverse-engeenering is also possible with compiled code, just harder.

The question, is how would it make money? We would have to develop for free?
Clients don't only need Source Code, they also need support, simple 
install and other details.

But for some software types it's true that it's like impossible to make 
them Open Source and make money with it. Like small and usefull 
utilities who are a good idea but who need a very small amount of 
technical code. Or big softwares that anyone known how to use.

But it's possible, SUN sell Star Office who is just an Open Office with 
little more things.

How could we compete with companys that download our own code for free?
A company who just downloaded the code can't known your code as you, so 
they will do a worst job than you and if they do anything usefull you 
could use their code.

Besides that would make us very vulnerable to software pattents.
Why ? If you use patented technics, try to convince politics that 
patents aren't (in software) a good thing, don't hide them.

I guess that the only real solution is to pre-compile the code, for every
plataform you plan on deploying, but neither mono or ms allow that. You
still have to feed the assembly.
As i said, pre-compile the code is to loose most of the avantages of a VM.
I know assembly code isn't safer too, yes its true, but the cost of
disassembling it is most of the times more, than the cost of buying or
redoing it.
If you understand french Contests like this one : 
http://www.challenge-securitech.com/html/accueil/ prove that even 
compiled code could be broken. But it's true that it need knowledge 
(Lots of if code is well protected with tools like Armadillo).
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Xheo License Management

2004-05-24 Thread Black Fox
Does anyone disagree?
No, but lot of people here (including me) are i think making 
Open-Source, if not Libre (Free) software, so for such people Ofuscators 
or things like that seem... hum a strange idea... Why use a decompiler 
when you could download the source.

But i don't think such security is possible when we speak of managed 
languages, more the Intermediate Language (Java .class or .Net IL) is 
similar to the normal language, more decompilers are simple

--
Black-Fox
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Monio Bets1 Testing on Mandrake 9.2

2004-05-24 Thread Black Fox
Tracy Barlow said the following:
the Error message is Encoding name `windows-1252' not supported
Seen previously in the list :
Ian MacLean said the following:
 This is a bug that has been fixed post beta 1. You either need to
 build from source or wait for the next beta.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] usage of the mailing list

2004-05-21 Thread Black Fox
because when i type reply its start another thread :((( and flood more !
I see your message in the thread with Mozilla ThunderBird Threaded View 
(View  Sort By  Threaded) so no problem and no flood.

--
Black-Fox
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Is it Mono safe?

2004-05-21 Thread Black Fox
Thomas R. Corbin said the following:
On Thursday May 20, 2004 12:41 pm, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
RAND + Royalty Free:
	Yes, that's true - it's just that I don't know what Reasonable will be.  If 
they think $1000 is reasonable, then I'm screwed.   I know you are 
justifiably tired of this issue, so I apologize for bothering you.
ECMA ask for reasonable and Microsoft said that for them this 
reasonable part mean (in this case) Royalty Free, not that it may be 
 otherwise.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Gladify SqlSharpGtk

2004-04-14 Thread Black Fox
I would like to replace it with gtksourceview#, but I do not know if it
works on Windows too.
I have searched this (To run MonoDevelop on windows) and never found... 
So i don't think it's a good idea (Maybe a plugin system with 
gtksourceview# used only on Unixes...)
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Gladify SqlSharpGtk

2004-04-13 Thread Black Fox
I would like to replace it with gtksourceview#, but I do not know if it
works on Windows too.
I have searched this (To run MonoDevelop on windows) and never found...
So i don't think it's a good idea (Maybe a plugin system with
gtksourceview# used only on Unixes...)
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list


Re: [Mono-list] Trouble accessing interface methods via as operator

2004-04-13 Thread Black Fox
Joe Scaduto said the following:
The type comes from a dll (Schedule.dll) which I compiled with the
namespace which IServices is defined (Umbrella.CIB.Service).  The file
where I reflect on the Schedule.dll, where the above code snippet is
from, I have 'using Umbrella.CIB.Service' which is the same namespace I
used for compiling the Schedule.dll  I thought then IServices as seen by
'type' and as seen by 'as' would be the same. Am I incorrect in this
assumption?  
You should read this : http://www.yoda.arachsys.com/csharp/plugin.html
It seem to be the same problem solved here.
___
Mono-list maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list