Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:36:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised... I see there's an ld debian branch... I wonder whether it should be a replacement for monotone-server. In function, if not in name. -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] editing wiki?
Thomas Keller m...@thomaskeller.biz writes: Am 21.10.2010 12:16, schrieb Thomas Keller: Am 21.10.2010 12:13, schrieb Stephen Leake: What is the URL for syncing the wiki branch? I don't even know the precise name for that branch. I need to edit the page about building on MinGW. nvm.web.ikiwiki And before I forget it - you noticed that web edits do work now again...? I had not noticed that. Do those edits get committed to mtn? I guess they could be, since sign in is required. -- -- Stephe ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
[Monotone-devel] 'SelfHostingInfo' on mtn wiki
The wiki page http://wiki.monotone.ca/SelfHostingInfo/ seems to be the prefered page for getting info on how to get set up for participating in mtn development. But it's confusing; it talks about my server and not being able to commit. And the URL syntax it uses is deprecated. Should I rewrite it, or is there a better page already? -- -- Stephe ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] 'SelfHostingInfo' on mtn wiki
Am 06.11.10 21:21, schrieb Stephen Leake: The wiki page http://wiki.monotone.ca/SelfHostingInfo/ seems to be the prefered page for getting info on how to get set up for participating in mtn development. But it's confusing; it talks about my server and not being able to commit. And the URL syntax it uses is deprecated. Should I rewrite it, or is there a better page already? You're right, this page is outdated and I spoke with Richard already who pointed me at it as well and gave him some directions. Please try to get in contact with him and coordinate the edit. Thanks, Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
[Monotone-devel] 0.48 - 0.99 sync behaviour change
What happened to the sync behaviour between 0.48 and 0.99? I just notice
that a pull of net.venge.monotone{,.*} from
mtn://code.montone.ca/montone will always transfer at least 6850 certs,
24 revs (3.0M in, 1.1M out) with monotone 0.48. It looks like those
revisions and certs never hit the database. I can't imagine why the
number of certs transferred is so high.
Furthermore, it looks like 0.99 will save those revs to the database
whilst 0.48 will ignore them. Given that 0.48 is in Debian freeze, I
want to make sure I'm not missing an important bug here as 4MB data
transfer without any apparent database changes seems a little worrying.
Francis
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
