Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20110131075604.ga14...@topoi.pooq.com on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:56:04 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: hendrik In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik hendrik hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? hendrik hendrikcomment This is a lengthy comment hendrik hendrik The comment has to be in quotes? hendrik Are newlines allowed? hendrik Should this be documented in hendrik https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ hendrik ? Quoted from that page: The configuration file for usher approximately follows monotone's basic_io format See http://monotone.thomaskeller.biz/docbuild/html/Formats.html#Formats for the basic_io format. Maybe the usher documentation should point to the monotone documentation for this. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited! -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
[Monotone-devel] usher comments
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:09:33AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: In message 20110131075604.ga14...@topoi.pooq.com on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:56:04 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: hendrik In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik hendrik hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? hendrik hendrikcomment This is a lengthy comment hendrik hendrik The comment has to be in quotes? hendrik Are newlines allowed? hendrik Should this be documented in hendrik https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ hendrik ? Quoted from that page: The configuration file for usher approximately follows monotone's basic_io format See http://monotone.thomaskeller.biz/docbuild/html/Formats.html#Formats for the basic_io format. Maybe the usher documentation should point to the monotone documentation for this. Actually, I've just discovered by accident that a '#' at the stat of a line seems to make the entire line be interpreted as a comment, quotes not needed. That seems not to be mentioned in either https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ or http://monotone.thomaskeller.biz/docbuild/html/Formats.html#Formats Thanks. -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
[Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-commits-diffs] net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup: d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2
Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org writes: Stephen, with regards to this change, I'd like to know the background for this: * Makefile.am (doc_monotone_TEXINFOS): move copy-html-deps copy-pdf-deps out of this; they must be files in the 'dist' target. Also delete $(EPS_FIGURES); doesn't work on Win32, not needed anyway Most especially, I'd like to know how having $(EPS_FIGURES) in $(doc_monotone_TEXINFOS) doesn't work on Win32. The tools that create *.eps are not available in MinGW. Not having $(EPS_FIGURES) in $(doc_monotone_TEXINFOS) doesn't work when trying to produce doc/monotone.dvi (which is needed to create doc/monotone.ps). The optimal thing would of course be if we could have a line like this to express extra dependencies: doc/monotone.dvi: $(EPS_FIGURES) Unfortunately, automake takes this as an override and will refuse to generate a doc/monotone.dvi of its own... Ok, that's a problem. Maybe we can make EPS_FIGURES be empty on Win32 MinGW? Is there a reason to build monotone.ps, when .pdf is available? If it comes down to a choice between monotone.ps and win32-installer, I think we can live without monotone.ps. this gets back to the question I asked: What Makefile targets are supposed to work? I tested monotone.pdf, but not monotone.ps. Is there some other target that builds monotone.ps? 'dist' apparently doesn't. What other targets do I need to test when messing with Makefiles? -- -- Stephe ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-commits-diffs] net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup: d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2
On 01/31/2011 07:36 PM, Stephen Leake wrote: this gets back to the question I asked: What Makefile targets are supposed to work? I tested monotone.pdf, but not monotone.ps. Is there some other target that builds monotone.ps? 'dist' apparently doesn't. What other targets do I need to test when messing with Makefiles? distcheck, since that's what the release checklist says to use. Also there's apparently an all target. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
