Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 02:26:18
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
hendrik In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011
15:05:33 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik
hendrik In your configuration file, you have a logdir setting. You
hendrik might want to look at the log file there (write.log, I believe).
hendrik
hendrik Yes.. There is oe now. I stopped looking because for a while there
hendrik wasn't one, but one has now showed up. It seems to be asking me for a
hendrik passphrase for key ID hend...@topoi.pooq.com {599fffe...}
hendrik
hendrik Presumably, monotone wants a passphrase wo start up in server mode.
hendrik
hendrik What's the recommended way to provide one nowadays? The method
hendrik involving the get_passphrase hook that the tutorial says is deprecated
hendrik because of insecurity? It does have to be available when there's no
hendrik user logged in on the server machine.
When it comes to automatic starts, such as starting a monotone server
under usher, this is of course a problem (as it is with all mechanisms
that require a password). The solution still involves the
get_passphrase hook (the deprecation is more for users than server
maintainers), and make sure it's appropriately protected, or to use
the expanded version contrib/get_passphrase_from_file.lua, which has
the passphrases it need to cover in a separate file (which should be
appropriately protected).
hendrik hendrik Or does it misreport a successful fork with an invalid
hendrik hendrik monotone command as a failed fork? Or ... (fill in the real
hendrik hendrik explanation here, please?)
hendrik
hendrik Well, an invalid command of some sort WOULD result in a failed fork,
hendrik so that's definitely a plausible explanation. Check the log in
hendrik {logdir}.
hendrik
hendrik Well, as long as the monotone process gets started, even if it
hendrik immediately complains and exits, the fork itself has succeeded, so at
hendrik the very least it's a misleading error message. But at this point
hendrik that's just a quibble.
There's a little bit more done to check that the monotone server has
started correctly. Usher waits for the server to output something and
expects the first line to contain beginning service. If that
doesn't happen, it will consider the fork a failure, hence the error
message. Maybe there should be a little bit more text explaining that
one might get more answers from the appropriate log...
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
http://richard.levitte.org/
Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:28:06AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110203072618.ga27...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011
02:26:18 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
When it comes to automatic starts, such as starting a monotone server
under usher, this is of course a problem (as it is with all mechanisms
that require a password). The solution still involves the
get_passphrase hook (the deprecation is more for users than server
maintainers), and make sure it's appropriately protected, or to use
the expanded version contrib/get_passphrase_from_file.lua, which has
the passphrases it need to cover in a separate file (which should be
appropriately protected).
I don't really see a big difference between the script being protected
and the separate file being protected. Unless the file with the scripts
gets to be huge with a lot of stuff that doesn't need protection, of
course.
hendrik hendrik Or does it misreport a successful fork with an invalid
hendrik hendrik monotone command as a failed fork? Or ... (fill in the
real
hendrik hendrik explanation here, please?)
hendrik
hendrik Well, an invalid command of some sort WOULD result in a failed
fork,
hendrik so that's definitely a plausible explanation. Check the log in
hendrik {logdir}.
hendrik
hendrik Well, as long as the monotone process gets started, even if it
hendrik immediately complains and exits, the fork itself has succeeded, so
at
hendrik the very least it's a misleading error message. But at this point
hendrik that's just a quibble.
There's a little bit more done to check that the monotone server has
started correctly. Usher waits for the server to output something and
expects the first line to contain beginning service. If that
doesn't happen, it will consider the fork a failure, hence the error
message. Maybe there should be a little bit more text explaining that
one might get more answers from the appropriate log...
Maybe the message should say that the monotone server failed to
start up correctly. That, after all, seems to be what's being tested.
When I saw the message that the fork failed, I immediately started
looking for ways that tthe executable file 'mtn' might not be there or
have the wrong permissions, etc. etc.
-- hendrik
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20110203160429.ga5...@topoi.pooq.com on Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:04:29 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik I don't really see a big difference between the script being hendrik protected and the separate file being protected. Unless the hendrik file with the scripts gets to be huge with a lot of stuff hendrik that doesn't need protection, of course. There's another point, and it's that if needed, a script is easier to upgrade (if need be) if the data is separate. We've been hitting that one a couple of times on code.monotone.ca. hendrik There's a little bit more done to check that the monotone server has hendrik started correctly. Usher waits for the server to output something and hendrik expects the first line to contain beginning service. If that hendrik doesn't happen, it will consider the fork a failure, hence the error hendrik message. Maybe there should be a little bit more text explaining that hendrik one might get more answers from the appropriate log... hendrik hendrik Maybe the message should say that the monotone server failed hendrik to start up correctly. That, after all, seems to be what's hendrik being tested. When I saw the message that the fork failed, I hendrik immediately started looking for ways that tthe executable hendrik file 'mtn' might not be there or have the wrong permissions, hendrik etc. etc. It's clearly better to look in the log file. If mtn can't be started, it will say execvp failed. But you make a point here, that some of the messages are a bit cryptic and really require that you know usher by source... It could be smart to make sure they're are a little bit more verbose, and thereby comprehensible. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited! -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:09:23AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
In your configuration file, you have a logdir setting. You might want
to look at the log file there (write.log, I believe).
Yes.. There is oe now. I stopped looking because for a while there
wasn't one, but one has now showed up. It seems to be asking me for a
passphrase for key ID hend...@topoi.pooq.com {599fffe...}
Presumably, monotone wants a passphrase wo start up in server mode.
What's the recommended way to provide one nowadays? The method
involving the get_passphrase hook that the tutorial says is deprecated
because of insecurity? It does have to be available when there's no
user logged in on the server machine.
hendrik Or does it misreport a successful fork with an invalid
hendrik monotone command as a failed fork? Or ... (fill in the real
hendrik explanation here, please?)
Well, an invalid command of some sort WOULD result in a failed fork,
so that's definitely a plausible explanation. Check the log in
{logdir}.
Well, as long as the monotone process gets started, even if it
immediately complains and exits, the fork itself has succeeded, so at
the very least it's a misleading error message. But at this point
that's just a quibble.
Thanks.
-- hendrik
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20110201200533.ga8...@topoi.pooq.com on Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:05:33
-0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said:
hendrik On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
hendrik
hendrik I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try
to
hendrik make sense of the documentation.
hendrik
hendrik
hendrik Well, I have usher running, and depending on how I write the
hendrik configuration file it reports I have one or two servers, called
write,
hendrik the one I want to start with, and local, the one inherited form the
hendrik example in the documentation.
hendrik
hendrik But when I try to sync with write from another computer, I geet
hendrik problems:
hendrik
hendrik hendrik@notlookedfor:~/write/Melinda$ mtn sync
4691://topoi.pooq.com/write
hendrik enter passphrase for key ID [hend...@notlookedfor.topoi.pooq.com]
(ad968be7...):
hendrik mtn: connecting to 4691://topoi.pooq.com/write
hendrik mtn: Received warning from usher: Cannot fork server.
hendrik mtn: peer 4691://topoi.pooq.com/write IO terminated connection in
working state (error)
hendrik mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
4691://topoi.pooq.com/write, disconnecting
hendrik hendrik@notlookedfor:~/write/Melinda$
In your configuration file, you have a logdir setting. You might want
to look at the log file there (write.log, I believe).
hendrik Can I get usher to tell me what the command it uses really
hendrik is, so I can try it in isolation?
Basically, if we say that {monotone} and {local} are the values of the
settings with corresponding names, it does this:
{monotone} server --bind=127.0.0.1:{randomport} {local}
hendrik Or does it misreport a successful fork with an invalid
hendrik monotone command as a failed fork? Or ... (fill in the real
hendrik explanation here, please?)
Well, an invalid command of some sort WOULD result in a failed fork,
so that's definitely a plausible explanation. Check the log in
{logdir}.
--
Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org
http://richard.levitte.org/
Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish
___
Monotone-devel mailing list
Monotone-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20110131075604.ga14...@topoi.pooq.com on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:56:04 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: hendrik In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik hendrik hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? hendrik hendrikcomment This is a lengthy comment hendrik hendrik The comment has to be in quotes? hendrik Are newlines allowed? hendrik Should this be documented in hendrik https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ hendrik ? Quoted from that page: The configuration file for usher approximately follows monotone's basic_io format See http://monotone.thomaskeller.biz/docbuild/html/Formats.html#Formats for the basic_io format. Maybe the usher documentation should point to the monotone documentation for this. Cheers, Richard -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited! -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 02:22:37AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? comment This is a lengthy comment The comment has to be in quotes? Are newlines allowed? Should this be documented in https://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ ? -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:04:46PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try to make sense of the documentation. More stupid question. (1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691. The 4691 is the usual monotone port number. But I'm not familiar with IP to know what the 0.0.0.0 means. Does it mean it listens on all interfaces on the machine? (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
In message 20101119201102.ga25...@topoi.pooq.com on Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:11:02 -0500, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com said: hendrik (1) The listen addr in the sample script is 0.0.0.0:4691. hendrik hendrikThe 4691 is the usual monotone port number. hendrik hendrikBut I'm not familiar with IP to know what the 0.0.0.0 means. Does hendrikit mean it listens on all interfaces on the machine? Yes. hendrik (2) Is there a comment convention for the usher config file? comment This is a lengthy comment -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited! -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On 11/09/2010 10:31 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz I did the ./configure, and make, and then I did make test I got a lot of stuff that looked like errors, but I suspect that the complete test environment wasn't available on my system. I don't, to my knowledge, have a server mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate or is that something the test scripts should have set up? . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. Using a Debian stable running on a 64-bit AMD64. It wants socat installed, and it doesn't properly handle when monotone sends the query string as part of the server name (it shouldn't do that and 0.99 doesn't, but I think 0.48 does). It really should handle that, and test against multiple monotone versions if available... If I understand you correctly, this is just a problem with the test suite, and not with usher itself? So I can just proceed to use usher without bothering with the tests? Yes. Of course, to be sure, I should install socat and repeat. And if I still have trouble, try with mtn 0.99? Is sending the query string as part of the server name a problem for usher, or just for the test suite? It's a problem for usher itself, I'll try to get it fixed in the next day or two. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz I did the ./configure, and make, and then I did make test I got a lot of stuff that looked like errors, but I suspect that the complete test environment wasn't available on my system. I don't, to my knowledge, have a server mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate or is that something the test scripts should have set up? . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. Using a Debian stable running on a 64-bit AMD64. It wants socat installed, and it doesn't properly handle when monotone sends the query string as part of the server name (it shouldn't do that and 0.99 doesn't, but I think 0.48 does). It really should handle that, and test against multiple monotone versions if available... ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On 11/08/2010 01:04 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. You can also browse the source at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ and see the documentation at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try to make sense of the documentation. I'm not clear what happens to authentication. Have I messed something? The example configuration has the line monotonemtn -k my_key This suggests to me that the various monotones in the herd are going to be performing actions fot the user whose key is my_key. What happens to the identity of the remote user who is initiating the sync operation? That's the server key, the same as you give to mtn serve. The remote user still authenticates with their own key; this is the key the server uses to authenticate to them. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On 11/08/2010 12:36 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: Well, I did download the tarball, http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz and untarred it. The README file says The documentation is in doc/documentation.html. But there is no doc directory to be found in the tarball. Looks like I forgot to put it in EXTRA_DIST to have it included in the tarball, so it's only in the source tree. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 08:50:26PM -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote: On 11/08/2010 01:49 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz I did the ./configure, and make, and then I did make test I got a lot of stuff that looked like errors, but I suspect that the complete test environment wasn't available on my system. I don't, to my knowledge, have a server mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate or is that something the test scripts should have set up? . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. Using a Debian stable running on a 64-bit AMD64. It wants socat installed, and it doesn't properly handle when monotone sends the query string as part of the server name (it shouldn't do that and 0.99 doesn't, but I think 0.48 does). It really should handle that, and test against multiple monotone versions if available... If I understand you correctly, this is just a problem with the test suite, and not with usher itself? So I can just proceed to use usher without bothering with the tests? Of course, to be sure, I should install socat and repeat. And if I still have trouble, try with mtn 0.99? Is sending the query string as part of the server name a problem for usher, or just for the test suite? -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher This is what I've been waiting for! But my browser had other ideas ... You can also browse the source at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ and see the documentation at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html Whe I enter this URL into my iceweasel browser, it tell me: You have chosen to open * documentation.html which is a: HTML Text from: http://code.monotone.ca What should iceweasel do with this file? * Open with [ /usr/bin/galeon (default) ] * Save File * Do this automatically for files like this from now on. [ X cancel ] [ OK ] The drop-down menu that suggests using galeon (another browser) presents me to choose between [ /usr/bin/galeon (default) ] and Other... Is this weird, or what? Iceweasel not knowing what to do with HTML? And suggesting handing it over to another browser? Well, I did download the tarball, http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz and untarred it. The README file says The documentation is in doc/documentation.html. But there is no doc directory to be found in the tarball. Of course, when in the browser I select 'save file' and tell it where to put it, it saves it away nicely. Then iceweasel has no trouble showing me the contents of the saved file, which appears to be -- what else? -- documentation! -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. You can also browse the source at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ and see the documentation at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html I guess now comes the inevitable flood of stupid questions as i try to make sense of the documentation. I'm not clear what happens to authentication. Have I messed something? The example configuration has the line monotonemtn -k my_key This suggests to me that the various monotones in the herd are going to be performing actions fot the user whose key is my_key. What happens to the identity of the remote user who is initiating the sync operation? -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as
usher-0.99 available from
mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher
and there is a tarball available at
http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz
I did the ./configure, and make, and then I did make test
I got a lot of stuff that looked like errors, but I suspect that the
complete test environment wasn't available on my system. I don't, to my
knowledge, have a server mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
or is that something the test scripts should have set up?
. It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD.
Using a Debian stable running on a 64-bit AMD64.
-- hendrik
make check-TESTS
make[1]: Entering directory `/farhome/hendrik/dn/usher/usher-0.99'
TESTDIR=/farhome/hendrik/dn/usher/usher-0.99/test-dir
Running test test1...
Copying scripts...
scripts
scripts/foobar.sh
bound to 127.0.0.1:23345
bound to 127.0.0.1:8691
Testing: serve example 127.0.0.1:25436
Testing: multipull 3 mtn://HOST/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: misuse: database
/farhome/hendrik/dn/usher/usher-0.99/test-dir/test1/example.mtn does not exist
mtn: setting default server to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.separate'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named 'prjek-s?net.prjek.separate'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate, disconnecting
mtn: setting default server to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.separate'
Testing: multipull 3 'mtn://HOST/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named 'prjek-s?net.prjek.separate'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate, disconnecting
mtn: setting default server to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.separate'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named 'prjek-s?net.prjek.separate'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek-s?net.prjek.separate, disconnecting
mtn: setting default server to
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named
'prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}, disconnecting
mtn: setting default server to
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named
'prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}, disconnecting
Testing: multipull 3 mtn://HOST/example?org.example
mtn: setting default server to
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named
'prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/prjek?net.prjek.{fnord,foobar}, disconnecting
mtn: setting default server to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/example?org.example
mtn: setting default branch include pattern to 'org.example'
mtn: setting default branch exclude pattern to ''
mtn: doing anonymous pull; use -kKEYNAME if you need authentication
mtn: connecting to mtn://127.0.0.1:8691/example?org.example
mtn: Received warning from usher: No server named 'example?org.example'
mtn: error: I/O failure while talking to peer
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
Am 08.11.10 19:36, schrieb Hendrik Boom: On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 11:46:03PM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote: There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher This is what I've been waiting for! But my browser had other ideas ... You can also browse the source at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ and see the documentation at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html Whe I enter this URL into my iceweasel browser, it tell me: You have chosen to open * documentation.html which is a: HTML Text from: http://code.monotone.ca What should iceweasel do with this file? * Open with [ /usr/bin/galeon (default) ] * Save File * Do this automatically for files like this from now on. [ X cancel ] [ OK ] The drop-down menu that suggests using galeon (another browser) presents me to choose between [ /usr/bin/galeon (default) ] and Other... Is this weird, or what? Iceweasel not knowing what to do with HTML? And suggesting handing it over to another browser? Its because individual files are represented with Content-disposition: attachment and that makes the browser open up the save as dialog. I linked the 0.99 version of the documentation now with a wiki page where you can just view it: http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/page/UsherDocumentation/ Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | tommyd3...@jabber.ccc.de | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 06:36:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte wrote: This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised... I see there's an ld debian branch... I wonder whether it should be a replacement for monotone-server. In function, if not in name. -- hendrik ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
[Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as usher-0.99 available from mtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher and there is a tarball available at http://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. You can also browse the source at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ and see the documentation at http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html There will be a 1.0 release around the same time as monotone 1.0. -- Timothy Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
Re: [Monotone-devel] usher 0.99 release (name-based virtual hosting for monotone)
This is a piece of software I'd like to see debianised... I see there's an ld debian branch... Cheers, Richard In message 4cd4dd8b.4080...@prjek.net on Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:46:03 -0500, Timothy Brownawell tbrow...@prjek.net said: tbrownaw There is an actual release of usher available now. It's tagged as tbrownaw usher-0.99 available from tbrownawmtn://monotone.ca/contrib?net.venge.monotone.usher tbrownaw and there is a tarball available at tbrownawhttp://mtn-host.prjek.net/projects/webhost/files/usher-0.99.tar.gz tbrownaw . It works on at least Debian and FreeBSD. tbrownaw tbrownaw You can also browse the source at tbrownawhttp://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/tree/t:usher-0.99/ tbrownaw and see the documentation at tbrownaw http://code.monotone.ca/p/contrib/source/file/t:usher-0.99/doc/documentation.html tbrownaw tbrownaw There will be a 1.0 release around the same time as monotone 1.0. tbrownaw tbrownaw -- tbrownaw Timothy tbrownaw tbrownaw Free public monotone hosting: http://mtn-host.prjek.net -- Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org http://richard.levitte.org/ Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited! -- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish ___ Monotone-devel mailing list Monotone-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
