[MOO-Cows] Re: [Lambdamoo-server] Re: [MOO-Cows] Messages 3 -4 on *C& Group

2003-03-05 Thread Seth I. Rich
I'd like really to suggest that a mailing list be created for this, since
I honestly don't care a whole heck of a lot about whatever
star-C-ampersand is going to be.

C-ampersand could be like C-and or Candy!

And so this would be Star Candy or a Pointer to Candy

or whatever but I don't care.

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Robert Sanderson wrote:

>
> Why don't we just call it what everyone has always called it?
>
> MOO ?
>
> Rob
>
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Luke-Jr wrote:
>
> > Message 3 on *C& Group (#72879):
> > Date:Wed Mar  5 12:42:14 2003 PST
> > From:xplat (#120816)
> > To:  *C& Group (#72879)
> > Subject: names
> >
> > Single-object: Muh
> > Object-oriented: MOO
> > Aspect-oriented: MAO
> > Subject-oriented: MEOW
> > Profit-oriented: M#
> > Disoriented: M%
> > Hacked into a MUSH server: MusX ;-)
> >
> >
> > Message 4 on *C& Group (#72879):
> > Date:Wed Mar  5 16:18:47 2003 PST
> > From:Luke-Jr (#115349)
> > To:  xplat (#120816) and *C& Group (#72879)
> > Subject: Re: names
> >
> > Was this a joke, or a real entry?
> > If real:
> > 1. What is "Subject Oriented"?
> > 2. What names would multiple orientations be called (Aspect+Object etc)?
> > 3. Profit-oriented and Disoriented wouldn't be real features, but would
> > more likely be a library used in any of the languages.
> > 4. "Hacked into a MUSH server" isn't valid, as these would be names for
> > the languages, not the implementations.
> > --
> >
> >
> > #
> > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> >   the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>

-- 
---
Seth I. Rich - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rabbits on walls, no problem.


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



[MOO-Cows] Re: [Lambdamoo-server] Re: [MOO-Cows] Messages 3 -4 on *C& Group

2003-03-06 Thread Seth I. Rich
> Because the language isn't only for MUD Object Oriented environments.
> Once we get the language more "finished", a goal is to get a functional
> GCC compiler backend so that code can run outside of MOOs.

To what end?  What does the MOO language, extracted from the server, have
which other languages don't?

Seth
-- 
-------
Seth I. Rich - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rabbits on walls, no problem.


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



moo-cows@the-b.org

2003-03-15 Thread Seth I. Rich
> Also, can we pick either MOO-Cows and Lambdamoo-server and stick with
> it? It seems apparent that everyone participating is on both lists.

I'd like to suggest that whoever wants to work on this work up a plan and
some notes, something to react to, aside from merely mentioning how neat
it would be to be able to compile MOOcode.

Actually, personally, I'm not betting that a language where `player' is
used for input, output, and errors is gonna fly all that well in the big
crazy world.

Seth
-- 
-------
Seth I. Rich - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rabbits on walls, no problem.


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



moo-cows@the-b.org

2003-03-16 Thread Seth I. Rich
> For example, perhaps it would be a good idea to have obj:verb usable
> as a pointer to the verb?

Are you considering adding pointers to MOOcode?  Adding pointers is OK,
but adding curly braces isn't?

Seth
-------
Seth I. Rich - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rabbits on walls, no problem.


#
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>