Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
I wonder if netiquette would have been appropriate when dealing with Lancer? ;)
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
BigRedFed wrote: So in other words, the following would have been more appropriate: Ted Bundy wrote: They finally fixed one of my bugs I was following. I checked the code to make sure that Drudge didn't change, they didn't. Fixed bug. Nice going for a change. Netscape still sucks. Eff you, a**hole. (edited for content) Yes.
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Bamm Gabriana wrote: If I say f*ck you.. or I tell someone to go fly a kite, what is the difference? The difference is in Netiquette. so please, enlighten me ow greate one, what is Netiquette and whom defines it?
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
so please, enlighten me ow greate one, what is Netiquette and whom defines it? http://www.google.com/search?q=netiquette
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Sören Kuklau wrote:
On 3/23/2002 11:22 PM, Senator Dan Burton apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Fuck you, asshole.
Yeah, fuck you, too.
And next time try to follow the netiquette, no matter how much a person
suckz.
Sorry, I am getting sick of him. He has already completely destroyed the
N6 group to the point where there is a major debate over whether to ban him
from the server, a radical move which has only been done 2 X in years. Now
I see this little cock over in this virgin group and it just sets me off.
He is nothing but a silly little weenie troll who hates Netscape (and
apparently Moz by association) and endlessly flames and trolls groups to
the point where the group is near-wrecked. There are a lot of ppl in here
doing serious work and I hate to see another fine group wrecked by a silly
little immature troll. Over in the N6 group, there are about 100 posts a
day, about 2/3 of which are nothing but asinine flame wars started by this
little eunuch and his sissy friend. IOW, the group is thrashed. :(
But I guess you don't care, eh. :(
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
On 3/24/2002 10:33 AM, Senator Dan Burton apparently wrote exactly the
following:
But I guess you don't care, eh. :(
I do care and I do understand, but that's still no reason for swearing.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Senator Dan Burton wrote: He is nothing but a silly little weenie troll who hates Netscape (and apparently Moz by association) and endlessly flames and trolls groups to the point where the group is near-wrecked. The best way to get rid of a troll is to simply ignore him. By the way there is no killfile implemented yet? -- Everyone who sends advertisement to me agrees to pay a fee of 10 Euro.
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
On 3/24/2002 12:48 PM, Martin Fritsche apparently wrote exactly the
following:
The best way to get rid of a troll is to simply ignore him.
By the way there is no killfile implemented yet?
No, there isn't, yet.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Sören Kuklau wrote: On 3/24/2002 12:48 PM, Martin Fritsche apparently wrote exactly the following: The best way to get rid of a troll is to simply ignore him. By the way there is no killfile implemented yet? No, there isn't, yet. Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a killfile but it sux.
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Senator Dan Burton wrote: Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a killfile but it sux. It doesn't. -- They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
And it came to pass that Christian Biesinger wrote:
Senator Dan Burton wrote:
Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a
killfile but it sux.
It doesn't.
Doesn't have a killfile, or doesn't suck?
--
}:-) Christopher Jahn
{:-( Dionysian Reveler
People must not do things for fun. We are not here for fun.
There is no reference to fun in any Act of Parliament.
To reply: xjahnATyahooDOTcom
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
On 3/25/2002 12:52 AM, Christopher Jahn apparently wrote exactly the
following:
And it came to pass that Christian Biesinger wrote:
Senator Dan Burton wrote:
Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a
killfile but it sux.
It doesn't.
Doesn't have a killfile, or doesn't suck?
Both.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Sören Kuklau wrote: On 3/24/2002 10:33 AM, Senator Dan Burton apparently wrote exactly the following: But I guess you don't care, eh. :( I do care and I do understand, but that's still no reason for swearing. If I say f*ck you.. or I tell someone to go fly a kite, what is the difference?
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
If I say f*ck you.. or I tell someone to go fly a kite, what is the difference? The difference is in Netiquette.
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Christian Biesinger wrote: Senator Dan Burton wrote: Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a killfile but it sux. It doesn't. This is simply false. In Moz 0.9.9 newsreader, one can set up filters on a number of things, including to delete the post based on a # of criteria. The applet is kinda sucky and lame but it is there indeed. So you are not saying that it does not exist (since it does) but you are saying that it sucks?
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Senator Dan Burton wrote: Christian Biesinger wrote: Senator Dan Burton wrote: Huh? You mean in Moz. Moz 0.9.9 newsreader has a killfile but it sux. It doesn't. This is simply false. In Moz 0.9.9 newsreader, one can set up filters on a number of things, including to delete the post based on a # of criteria. The applet is kinda sucky and lame but it is there indeed. So you are not saying that it does not exist (since it does) but you are saying that it sucks? The filters can be applied only to mail accounts, not news. Unless it has been added to a nightly. I haven't been keeping up. -- AA #1966 EAC Liar, Damned Liar, and Statistician Statistical thinking will one day be as necessary for efficient citizenship as the ability to read and write. - H.G. Wells
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
On 3/23/2002 11:22 PM, Senator Dan Burton apparently wrote exactly the
following:
Fuck you, asshole.
Yeah, fuck you, too.
And next time try to follow the netiquette, no matter how much a person
suckz.
--
Regards,
Sören Kuklau ('Chucker')
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Senator Dan Burton authored the following: Ted Bundy wrote: They finally fixed one of my bugs I was following. I checked the code to make sure that Drudge didn't change, they didn't. Fixed bug. Nice going for a change. Netscape still sucks. Fuck you, asshole. No thanks, I'm married and straight. Please take your sexual fantasies to the correct newsgroup in the future -- Kyle
Re: Ted Bundy posts again.
Bundy wrote: Senator Dan Burton authored the following: Ted Bundy wrote: They finally fixed one of my bugs I was following. I checked the code to make sure that Drudge didn't change, they didn't. Fixed bug. Nice going for a change. Netscape still sucks. Fuck you, asshole. No thanks, I'm married and straight. Please take your sexual fantasies to the correct newsgroup in the future ROFL -- Kyle -- I would rather gnaw my leg off, pack the bleeding stump with salt, and run in a circle on broken glass than have to deal with any Microsoft product on a regular basis. -- Dan Zimmerman, Vanderbilt University, when asked about Windows NT. Anti-spam e-mail address, change _AT_, sorry for the inconvenience
