Re: [mpd-devel] Request for GPL source code of DMS-500_v1.30.9_20170802.zip

[Max Kellermann]

On 2018/03/01 16:48, Billy Wright  wrote:
> Attached is the MPD open source code of the DMS-500 in accordance with 
> conditions of the GPL v2.

Imported to GitHub: 
https://github.com/MusicPlayerDaemon/MPD/commit/f4c2fa881b7e506abab1a1255682e0549a93b15b
___
mpd-devel mailing list
mpd-devel@musicpd.org
http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel

Re: [mpd-devel] Request for GPL source code of DMS-500_v1.30.9_20170802.zip

[Max Kellermann]

On 2018/03/04 13:34, Max Kellermann  wrote:
> On 2018/03/01 16:48, Billy Wright  wrote:
> > Attached is the MPD open source code of the DMS-500 in accordance with 
> > conditions of the GPL v2.
> 
> Imported to GitHub: 
> https://github.com/MusicPlayerDaemon/MPD/commit/f4c2fa881b7e506abab1a1255682e0549a93b15b

Note that this is based on commit
250b6a3d521523617ea654d66a5156faa64f6f28 authored by me on February
3rd.

Cary Audio learned about their license termination one week prior to
this (January 25th).

At the time their binaries in question were built, the source code
Billy Wright just gave me didn't yet exist.  This has interesting
implications: Cary Audio indeed did continue to use MPD even after I
terminated their license.

For some time I thought Cary Audio would create a new firmware version
completely without MPD, because the license is terminated.  But it
looks like that's not what they're doing.  They are just going on with
business as if nothing happened, and send this Billy Wright drone to
distract me with his lies and bullshit.

Max
___
mpd-devel mailing list
mpd-devel@musicpd.org
http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel

Re: [mpd-devel] Request for GPL source code of DMS-500_v1.30.9_20170802.zip

[Max Kellermann]

On 2018/03/01 16:48, Billy Wright  wrote:
> Max,
> 
> Attached is the MPD open source code of the DMS-500 in accordance with 
> conditions of the GPL v2.

No, this is *NOT* in accordance with conditions of the GPL v2.  This
is still not the source code of the two binaries I asked you about.

Now I have two source tarballs from you, two completely different ones
(first one based on 0.20 pre-alpha, and the new one based on 0.21
pre-alpha), but both are wrong and incomplete.

> Also, I tried to call yesterday on 2 numbers I had for you. It just
> rang and rang and no ability to leave a message. I have also
> e-mailed yesterday and today asking a phone number so I could give
> you a call. I have not received any response. Please let me know a
> number and a good time for you so I can give you a call.

You know how to leave me a message.  You just did.  Unfortunately, you
were lying again, and you still:

- havn't given me the source code of the two MPD binaries

- are still actively promoting your DMS-500 product which is still
  based on a pirated copy of my software, making your whole product
  illegal

- fail to understand that your MPD license is T-E-R-M-I-N-A-T-E-D and
  it is in my arbitrary decision to ever reissue a license for you, so
  you better play nice with me

Your behavior is evil and nefarious.  Or you are just extremely
incompetent and still don't realize what you're doing and in what
existential legal and financial danger you're currently bringing the
whole Cary Audio firm.

(Third option: maybe you're just a good troll, because you just made
me repeat the same points AGAIN with your brief and dull email.)

I have no idea what I should be phoning about with a person like you.
Leave me a message (you know how) and explain it to me.  Why should I
phone with you, after what you've been doing to me, after you've been
failing to deliver what I have been asking you, and is your most
primitive obligation as a MPD licensee?
___
mpd-devel mailing list
mpd-devel@musicpd.org
http://mailman.blarg.de/listinfo/mpd-devel