Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Troy Martin]

In the SQL server configuration tools, TCP/IP protocol is required to be 
enabled on the server as well.  Also, the ConfigMgr Network Access Account 
needs a SQL login and granted db_datareader perms to the MDT database.

1E | Software Lifecycle Automation

On Jul 5, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Giroux, Eric J 
> wrote:

I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini using 
NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have always used 
named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down on dis-allowing 
use of named pipes.

Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a return of:

ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS 
LOGON'. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would 
authenticating using network access account credentials but this feels as 
though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make the connection, which I do not 
want to use.

Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?

Thanks,

Eric Giroux
Solutions Engineer
Unum Group
E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Todd Hemsell]

The drive it is mapping, is it mapping it to the SQL server or some other
server?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Todd Hemsell  wrote:

> Are you using the default instance of SQL or a named instance? What port
> number?
> Post your [DB_WIAT] section pls.
> can remove the values of server name and such, unless it has instance.
> Then replace the server name with SERVER and the instance name with
> INSTANCE. Leave the rest as is.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:
>
>> Yes to both of those.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2016 6:46 PM
>> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES
>>
>>
>>
>> This message originated outside of Unum. Use caution when opening
>> attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you specifying a SQLShare?
>>
>> Does the Database allow integrated authentication?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:
>>
>> I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini
>> using NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have
>> always used named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down
>> on dis-allowing use of named pipes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a
>> return of:
>>
>>
>>
>> ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user ‘NT
>> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON’. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding
>> Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would authenticating using network access account
>> credentials but this feels as though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make
>> the connection, which I do not want to use.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Eric Giroux*
>>
>> Solutions Engineer
>>
>> Unum Group
>>
>> E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
>>
>> Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Todd Hemsell]

Are you using the default instance of SQL or a named instance? What port
number?
Post your [DB_WIAT] section pls.
can remove the values of server name and such, unless it has instance. Then
replace the server name with SERVER and the instance name with INSTANCE.
Leave the rest as is.



On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:

> Yes to both of those.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2016 6:46 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES
>
>
>
> This message originated outside of Unum. Use caution when opening
> attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information.
>
>
>
> Are you specifying a SQLShare?
>
> Does the Database allow integrated authentication?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:
>
> I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini
> using NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have
> always used named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down
> on dis-allowing use of named pipes.
>
>
>
> Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a
> return of:
>
>
>
> ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user ‘NT
> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON’. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding
> Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would authenticating using network access account
> credentials but this feels as though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make
> the connection, which I do not want to use.
>
>
>
> Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Eric Giroux*
>
> Solutions Engineer
>
> Unum Group
>
> E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
>
> Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Giroux, Eric J]

Yes to both of those.

[cid:image001.png@01D1D6F3.70A6C670]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 6:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

This message originated outside of Unum. Use caution when opening attachments, 
clicking links or responding to requests for information.

Are you specifying a SQLShare?
Does the Database allow integrated authentication?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J 
> wrote:
I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini using 
NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have always used 
named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down on dis-allowing 
use of named pipes.

Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a return of:

ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user ‘NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS 
LOGON’. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would 
authenticating using network access account credentials but this feels as 
though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make the connection, which I do not 
want to use.

Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?

Thanks,

Eric Giroux
Solutions Engineer
Unum Group
E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158

Re: [mssms] Loading bootimage slow

[Todd Hemsell]

Any changes to the switches or ports you are using?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Steve Wouden 
wrote:

>
>
> SCCM 2012R2 CU1+MDT 2013 and windows 7 clients
>
> I configure and administer the SCCM environment, but Servicedesk do the
> testing and deployment.
>
> Today I noticed loading the boot image takes about 5 to 6 minutes. I don’t
> know when tis started.
>
>
>
> The bootimage is about 282 Mb
>
>
>
> Only a few NIC drivers are loaded in the bootimage
>
> Used this script
> http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/automate-importing-and-creating-drivers-packages-in-sccm-2012-r2/
> to import the NIC drivers.
>
> Both the driver package and source are each about 12 Mb
>
>
>
> In the properties of the bootimage I see another image size:
>
> Is this the actual size of the bootimage?
>
> Thanks
> 
> Amsterdam Brussels Dubai Hong Kong London Luxembourg New York
> Before printing this e-mail consider the impact on the environment.
> This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you
> have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately.
>
> Stibbe N.V. is a Dutch law firm registered with the Dutch Chamber of
> Commerce under number 34198700. Any services performed are carried out
> pursuant to an agreement for services ('overeenkomst van opdracht') with
> Stibbe N.V. This agreement is governed exclusively by Dutch law, with the
> exception of rules of Dutch private international law. All disputes shall
> be decided exclusively by the competent court in Amsterdam, The
> Netherlands, without prejudice to the right to appeal.
>
> The general conditions of Stibbe N.V., which include a limitation of
> liability, apply and are available on
> http://www.stibbe.com/generalconditions or upon request.
>
> Stibbe N.V. is part of an international network of Stibbe offices in
> Amsterdam, Brussels, Dubai, Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg and New York.
> More information about us and our services can be found on
> http://www.stibbe.com/importantinformation.
>
>

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Todd Hemsell]

send the entire SQL section and more of the log.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Todd Hemsell  wrote:

> Are you specifying a SQLShare?
> Does the Database allow integrated authentication?
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:
>
>> I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini
>> using NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have
>> always used named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down
>> on dis-allowing use of named pipes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a
>> return of:
>>
>>
>>
>> ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user ‘NT
>> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON’. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding
>> Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would authenticating using network access account
>> credentials but this feels as though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make
>> the connection, which I do not want to use.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> *Eric Giroux*
>>
>> Solutions Engineer
>>
>> Unum Group
>>
>> E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
>>
>> Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [mssms] CS.ini SQL without NAMED PIPES

[Todd Hemsell]

Are you specifying a SQLShare?
Does the Database allow integrated authentication?

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giroux, Eric J  wrote:

> I need a bit of guidance to make SQL connection from CustomSettings.ini
> using NT Authentication (network access account) vs named pipes.  Have
> always used named pipes successfully but DBAs are putting their foot down
> on dis-allowing use of named pipes.
>
>
>
> Adding Netlib=DBMSSOCN to my SQL section of my CS.ini is giving me a
> return of:
>
>
>
> ZTI error opening SQL Connection: Login failed for user ‘NT
> AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON’. (-2147217843).  I assumed by adding
> Netlib=DBMSSOCN it would authenticating using network access account
> credentials but this feels as though it is needing a SQL ID and pwd to make
> the connection, which I do not want to use.
>
>
>
> Is anyone using Netlib=DBMSSOCN successfully?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Eric Giroux*
>
> Solutions Engineer
>
> Unum Group
>
> E-mail: egir...@unum.com | Office: (207) 575-2482
>
> Mobile: (207) 239-5190 | Fax: (207) 575-2158
>
>
>
>

[mssms] Loading bootimage slow

[Steve Wouden]

SCCM 2012R2 CU1+MDT 2013 and windows 7 clients
I configure and administer the SCCM environment, but Servicedesk do the testing 
and deployment.
Today I noticed loading the boot image takes about 5 to 6 minutes. I don’t know 
when tis started.
[cid:image001.png@01D1D716.B2D60D80]

The bootimage is about 282 Mb
[cid:image002.png@01D1D717.2722B260]
[cid:image003.png@01D1D717.2722B260]

Only a few NIC drivers are loaded in the bootimage
[cid:image004.png@01D1D717.7B0F1260]
Used this script 
http://blog.coretech.dk/kea/automate-importing-and-creating-drivers-packages-in-sccm-2012-r2/
 to import the NIC drivers.
Both the driver package and source are each about 12 Mb

In the properties of the bootimage I see another image size:
[cid:image005.png@01D1D718.40AC5DC0]
Is this the actual size of the bootimage?
Thanks
[http://www.stibbe.com/images/hq/logoStibbe.png]
Amsterdam Brussels Dubai Hong Kong London Luxembourg New York

Before printing this e-mail consider the impact on the environment.
This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately.

Stibbe N.V. is a Dutch law firm registered with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce 
under number 34198700. Any services performed are carried out pursuant to an 
agreement for services ('overeenkomst van opdracht') with Stibbe N.V. This 
agreement is governed exclusively by Dutch law, with the exception of rules of 
Dutch private international law. All disputes shall be decided exclusively by 
the competent court in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, without prejudice to the 
right to appeal.

The general conditions of Stibbe N.V., which include a limitation of liability, 
apply and are available on http://www.stibbe.com/generalconditions or upon 
request.

Stibbe N.V. is part of an international network of Stibbe offices in Amsterdam, 
Brussels, Dubai, Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg and New York. More information 
about us and our services can be found on 
http://www.stibbe.com/importantinformation.

[mssms] RE: Skype for Busines 2016 Install issue

[Johns, Damon (DoJ)]

Yes most likely, glad you sorted the problem ☺

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Steve Wouden
Sent: Wednesday, 6 July 2016 5:48 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com' 
Subject: [mssms] RE: Skype for Busines 2016 Install issue


Aha.. Didn’t know that.
Thanks for the tip.
Probably I can do the same for Lync VDI plugin.
[cid:image002.png@01D1D74F.EC13E4D0]
Looks similar to SfB..


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 12:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Skype for Busines 2016 Install issue

Hi Steve,

MSI code for Skype For Business 2016 (x86) can be reference from the lync.ww 
folder. Point your application to use the MSI code form lyncww.msi

[cid:image003.png@01D1D74F.EC13E4D0]

Cheers
Dmaon





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.

[http://www.stibbe.com/images/hq/logoStibbe.png]

Amsterdam Brussels Dubai Hong Kong London Luxembourg New York

Before printing this e-mail consider the impact on the environment.

This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately.

Stibbe N.V. is a Dutch law firm registered with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce 
under number 34198700. Any services performed are carried out pursuant to an 
agreement for services ('overeenkomst van opdracht') with Stibbe N.V. This 
agreement is governed exclusively by Dutch law, with the exception of rules of 
Dutch private international law. All disputes shall be decided exclusively by 
the competent court in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, without prejudice to the 
right to appeal.

The general conditions of Stibbe N.V., which include a limitation of liability, 
apply and are available on http://www.stibbe.com/generalconditions or upon 
request.

Stibbe N.V. is part of an international network of Stibbe offices in Amsterdam, 
Brussels, Dubai, Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg and New York. More information 
about us and our services can be found on 
http://www.stibbe.com/importantinformation.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.

[mssms] RE: Skype for Busines 2016 Install issue

[Steve Wouden]

Aha.. Didn’t know that.
Thanks for the tip.
Probably I can do the same for Lync VDI plugin.
[cid:image002.png@01D1D706.DB632AE0]
Looks similar to SfB..


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 12:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Skype for Busines 2016 Install issue

Hi Steve,

MSI code for Skype For Business 2016 (x86) can be reference from the lync.ww 
folder. Point your application to use the MSI code form lyncww.msi

[cid:image001.png@01D1D706.71E2CE40]

Cheers
Dmaon





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.

[http://www.stibbe.com/images/hq/logoStibbe.png]
Amsterdam Brussels Dubai Hong Kong London Luxembourg New York

Before printing this e-mail consider the impact on the environment.
This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately.

Stibbe N.V. is a Dutch law firm registered with the Dutch Chamber of Commerce 
under number 34198700. Any services performed are carried out pursuant to an 
agreement for services ('overeenkomst van opdracht') with Stibbe N.V. This 
agreement is governed exclusively by Dutch law, with the exception of rules of 
Dutch private international law. All disputes shall be decided exclusively by 
the competent court in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, without prejudice to the 
right to appeal.

The general conditions of Stibbe N.V., which include a limitation of liability, 
apply and are available on http://www.stibbe.com/generalconditions or upon 
request.

Stibbe N.V. is part of an international network of Stibbe offices in Amsterdam, 
Brussels, Dubai, Hong Kong, London, Luxembourg and New York. More information 
about us and our services can be found on 
http://www.stibbe.com/importantinformation.

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Sherry Kissinger]

I'm not aware of a web front end as a cm console replacement.  If you
really need something like that, I suspect you'll need to hire in a
consulting firm to make one, if you can't build your own.

That said...does it HAVE to be a true "Web Front End"?  Or what you really
mean is "I want to be able to scope that this team A can only do XYZ, and
this team B can only do ABC" ?  For that, host a CM Console instance either
in Citrix (if you have Citrix) or as a Remote Desktop Application hosted on
a server; and use CM roles and scopes to limit was Team A and Team B can
see in the console, and what they can do.

Another option, again NOT a true http/https web front end... but you can do
amazing gui-like "stuff" with Powershell.

Other options... what do YOU mean by "light management"?  Shopping-like
behavior?  You can do all kinds of things, from complex and $$ to (still
complex but free) shopping front ends.

You also said you don't really want an MDT front end... but if what you
mean is "I need to let people add machines to a collection"--that's part of
those tools, see this
http://mdtcustomizations.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Webservice%20-%20SCCM=Documentation



On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Marcum, John  wrote:

> Ron’s Web Tools 2003. J
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Marcussen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1:52 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend
>
>
>
> Not looking for a UDI/MDT Frontend – but an alternative to the CM Console
> for light management and assignment
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
> *Sent:* 5. juli 2016 18:54
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend
>
>
>
> google "Maik Koster"
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen <
> thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends
> for CM2012?
>
> Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management
>
>
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>


-- 
Thank you,

Sherry Kissinger

My Parameters:  Standardize. Simplify. Automate
Blogs: http://www.mofmaster.com, http://mnscug.org/blogs/sherry-kissinger,
http://www.smguru.org

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Andrew Djuplin]

For simple deploying applications to a single machine, my helpdesk has been
using Scott Keiffer's web front end
https://scottkeiffer.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/configuration-manager-web-frontend/

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Marcum, John  wrote:

> Ron’s Web Tools 2003. J
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Marcussen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1:52 PM
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend
>
>
>
> Not looking for a UDI/MDT Frontend – but an alternative to the CM Console
> for light management and assignment
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
> *Sent:* 5. juli 2016 18:54
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend
>
>
>
> google "Maik Koster"
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen <
> thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends
> for CM2012?
>
> Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management
>
>
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be
> protected by the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender by replying to
> this e-mail and then delete it from your computer.
>
>


-- 
*Andrew Djuplin*
512-232-1077

Typical problems have documented solutions:
http://cns.utexas.edu/oit-wiki
Enter a ticket here for a quick response:

http://cns.utexas.edu/help

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Todd Hemsell]

why? What are you trying to accomplish?

you can edit the console if you need to. Enable and disable parts of it.

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Thomas Marcussen <
thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote:

> Not looking for a UDI/MDT Frontend – but an alternative to the CM Console
> for light management and assignment
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Todd Hemsell
> *Sent:* 5. juli 2016 18:54
> *To:* mssms@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend
>
>
>
> google "Maik Koster"
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen <
> thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends
> for CM2012?
>
> Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management
>
>
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[John Aubrey]

I used the Windows 10 servicing successfully in the production branch.  It 
treats the Windows 10 upgrade just like a Windows update.  You can’t really 
customize it.  I ended up with an upgrade task sequence.  I keep the golden WIM 
from Microsoft and use PowerShell to do all my customization after the fact.

Anyone want to hop on board, feel free to vote on my issue.

https://configurationmanager.uservoice.com/forums/300492-ideas/suggestions/15089493-windows-10-servicing-customization

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 11:30 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

+1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 9:39 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

It’s never truly been broken. There are just a lot of caveats due to how the 
upgrades are/were published in WSUS along with things that the in-place upgrade 
scenario from a Windows perspective simply doesn’t handle gracefully (or at 
all). If you any actual control over the process, then an upgrade task sequence 
that enables you to do additional things is the way to go; examples include 
(but are not limited to) removing built-in store apps, dealing with third-party 
disk encryption or AV, injecting drivers, adding languages.

Thus, it is completely possible to use the built-in servicing successfully but 
in most corporate environments, due to the variety and complexity involved, the 
simplistic fire and forget upgrade is just not sufficient to handle all of 
these caveats.

I don’t think Microsoft has any explicit recommendation here at all. They’ve 
provided multiple technically viable paths and it’s up to you to choose which 
is best for your organization.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian Illner
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:26 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

Is the Windows 10 Servicing feature still broken within SCCM?

Last instruction I had read from MS was to deploy the Win10 upgrades via the 
standard Software Updates, and not attempt the Servicing Plans yet.

BRIAN ILLNER | Canal Insurance Company
864.250.9227
864.679.2537 Fax
Visit canalinsurance.com for news and information.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D1D6CC.EEE013B0]
[cid:image002.jpg@01D1D6CC.EEE013B0]
WARNING:  As the information in this transmittal (including attachments, if 
any) may contain confidential, proprietary, or business trade secret 
information, it should only be reviewed by those who are the intended 
recipients.  Unless you are an intended recipient, any review, use, disclosure, 
distribution or copying of this transmittal (or any attachments) is strictly 
prohibited.   If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me 
immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  While 
Canal believes this transmittal to be free of virus or other defect, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by Canal (or its subsidiaries and affiliates) for 
any loss or damage arising therefrom.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Juelich, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.


---

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones 
> wrote:
Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between for 
the bleeding edge folks' release?






The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.




**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues

RE: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Thomas Marcussen]

Not looking for a UDI/MDT Frontend – but an alternative to the CM Console for 
light management and assignment

Venlig hilsen / Best regards

Thomas Marcussen
Security and Cloud Architect

D:  +45 88418792
M:  +45 23896102
E:  t...@comm2ig.dk

COMM2IG A/S
Kokkedal Industripark 104
DK-2980 Kokkedal
+45 70217021
www.comm2ig.dk

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: 5. juli 2016 18:54
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

google "Maik Koster"

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen 
> wrote:
Hi,

Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends for 
CM2012?
Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management


Venlig hilsen / Best regards

Thomas Marcussen
Security and Cloud Architect

D:  +45 88418792
M:  +45 23896102
E:  t...@comm2ig.dk

COMM2IG A/S
Kokkedal Industripark 104
DK-2980 Kokkedal
+45 70217021
www.comm2ig.dk

Re: [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Todd Hemsell]

google "Maik Koster"

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:45 AM, Thomas Marcussen <
thomas.marcus...@comm2ig.dk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends
> for CM2012?
>
> Looking for some to assign collection members “light” management
>
>
>
>
>
> Venlig hilsen / Best regards
>
>
>
> *Thomas Marcussen*
> Security and Cloud Architect
>
> D:  +45 88418792
> M:  +45 23896102
> E:  t...@comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
> *COMM2IG A/S *Kokkedal Industripark 104
>
> DK-2980 Kokkedal
> +45 70217021
> www.comm2ig.dk
>
>
>
>

RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[Marable, Mike]

+1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 9:39 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

It’s never truly been broken. There are just a lot of caveats due to how the 
upgrades are/were published in WSUS along with things that the in-place upgrade 
scenario from a Windows perspective simply doesn’t handle gracefully (or at 
all). If you any actual control over the process, then an upgrade task sequence 
that enables you to do additional things is the way to go; examples include 
(but are not limited to) removing built-in store apps, dealing with third-party 
disk encryption or AV, injecting drivers, adding languages.

Thus, it is completely possible to use the built-in servicing successfully but 
in most corporate environments, due to the variety and complexity involved, the 
simplistic fire and forget upgrade is just not sufficient to handle all of 
these caveats.

I don’t think Microsoft has any explicit recommendation here at all. They’ve 
provided multiple technically viable paths and it’s up to you to choose which 
is best for your organization.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian Illner
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:26 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

Is the Windows 10 Servicing feature still broken within SCCM?

Last instruction I had read from MS was to deploy the Win10 upgrades via the 
standard Software Updates, and not attempt the Servicing Plans yet.

BRIAN ILLNER | Canal Insurance Company
864.250.9227
864.679.2537 Fax
Visit canalinsurance.com for news and information.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D1D6B0.8B228AE0]
[cid:image002.jpg@01D1D6B0.8B228AE0]
WARNING:  As the information in this transmittal (including attachments, if 
any) may contain confidential, proprietary, or business trade secret 
information, it should only be reviewed by those who are the intended 
recipients.  Unless you are an intended recipient, any review, use, disclosure, 
distribution or copying of this transmittal (or any attachments) is strictly 
prohibited.   If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me 
immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  While 
Canal believes this transmittal to be free of virus or other defect, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by Canal (or its subsidiaries and affiliates) for 
any loss or damage arising therefrom.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Juelich, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.


---

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones 
> wrote:
Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between for 
the bleeding edge folks' release?






The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.



**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues 

RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[Jason Sandys]

It’s never truly been broken. There are just a lot of caveats due to how the 
upgrades are/were published in WSUS along with things that the in-place upgrade 
scenario from a Windows perspective simply doesn’t handle gracefully (or at 
all). If you any actual control over the process, then an upgrade task sequence 
that enables you to do additional things is the way to go; examples include 
(but are not limited to) removing built-in store apps, dealing with third-party 
disk encryption or AV, injecting drivers, adding languages.

Thus, it is completely possible to use the built-in servicing successfully but 
in most corporate environments, due to the variety and complexity involved, the 
simplistic fire and forget upgrade is just not sufficient to handle all of 
these caveats.

I don’t think Microsoft has any explicit recommendation here at all. They’ve 
provided multiple technically viable paths and it’s up to you to choose which 
is best for your organization.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian Illner
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:26 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

Is the Windows 10 Servicing feature still broken within SCCM?

Last instruction I had read from MS was to deploy the Win10 upgrades via the 
standard Software Updates, and not attempt the Servicing Plans yet.

BRIAN ILLNER | Canal Insurance Company
864.250.9227
864.679.2537 Fax
Visit canalinsurance.com for news and information.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D1D698.AACBA1A0]
[cid:image002.jpg@01D1D698.AACBA1A0]
WARNING:  As the information in this transmittal (including attachments, if 
any) may contain confidential, proprietary, or business trade secret 
information, it should only be reviewed by those who are the intended 
recipients.  Unless you are an intended recipient, any review, use, disclosure, 
distribution or copying of this transmittal (or any attachments) is strictly 
prohibited.   If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me 
immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  While 
Canal believes this transmittal to be free of virus or other defect, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by Canal (or its subsidiaries and affiliates) for 
any loss or damage arising therefrom.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Juelich, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.


---

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones 
> wrote:
Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between for 
the bleeding edge folks' release?






The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.

RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[Jason Sandys]

Adam is correct. It’s important to denote the TP releases as such because there 
will also be a full production 1606 release (just like there was a TP and a 
full production 1602 release also). So the TP should be TP1606 otherwise we’ll 
all go completely bonkers trying to keep the two separated.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Juelich, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 7:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.


---

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones 
> wrote:
Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between for 
the bleeding edge folks' release?






The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.

RE: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[Brian Illner]

Is the Windows 10 Servicing feature still broken within SCCM?

Last instruction I had read from MS was to deploy the Win10 upgrades via the 
standard Software Updates, and not attempt the Servicing Plans yet.

BRIAN ILLNER | Canal Insurance Company
864.250.9227
864.679.2537 Fax
Visit canalinsurance.com for news and information.
[cid:image001.jpg@01D1D69F.47732E50]
[cid:image002.jpg@01D1D69F.47732E50]
WARNING:  As the information in this transmittal (including attachments, if 
any) may contain confidential, proprietary, or business trade secret 
information, it should only be reviewed by those who are the intended 
recipients.  Unless you are an intended recipient, any review, use, disclosure, 
distribution or copying of this transmittal (or any attachments) is strictly 
prohibited.   If you have received this transmittal in error, please notify me 
immediately by reply email and destroy all copies of the transmittal.  While 
Canal believes this transmittal to be free of virus or other defect, it is the 
responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no 
responsibility is accepted by Canal (or its subsidiaries and affiliates) for 
any loss or damage arising therefrom.
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Juelich, Adam
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 8:54 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.


---

Adam Juelich

Pulaski Community School District

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones 
> wrote:
Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between for 
the bleeding edge folks' release?






The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of any 
characteristic protected under State or Federal law.

Re: [mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[Juelich, Adam]

CB is 1602, and the TP release is 1606 I believe.

*---*

*Adam Juelich*

Pulaski Community School District 

Client Management Specialist

920-822-6075


On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:12 AM, David Jones  wrote:

> Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between
> for the bleeding edge folks' release?
>
>
>
>

-- 

--
The Pulaski Community School District does not discriminate on the basis of 
any characteristic protected under State or Federal law.

[mssms] SCCM Current Branch

[David Jones]

Right now, what is the Current Branch and what is the latest 'in between
for the bleeding edge folks' release?

[mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

[Kevin Johnston]

I am making changes to New Computer.

In the same Config xml file I see where my previous changes were (prior to the 
upgrade) and those are the ones showing up. Then I add another one, save it, 
look at the xml file and see that it is there, but when I launch the TS the 
changes do not show up. I even renamed one of the drop down names and it does 
not show up.

Very strange behavior, and I am not sure what log files I can use to confirm 
100% where this xml file exists...

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Mawdsley R.
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 4:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [BULK] [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my 
configurations
Importance: Low

Which StageGroup are you making your changes in?

There's a chance your changes are in a different StageGroup then the one being 
called during OSD.

Rich Mawdsley

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: 05 July 2016 00:47
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

So is your Task Sequence referring that MDT package? I'm assuming you have 
checked?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 9:27 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

When I edit the file I am browsing directly to where the MDT package is that is 
referenced.

I am not specifically referencing my udiwizard_config.xml file, I never had to 
do that before and any changes I made would work. It is referencing just the 
UDIWizard.wsf file.

I will add the /definition part and see if that fixes it.

It truly is strange that the files on the c:\ that gets copied does not have 
anything.

Kevin

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 6:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [BULK] [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my 
configurations
Importance: Low

Have you checked if the UDIWizard_Config.xml is actually in your MDT Toolkit 
package source (specifically in the Scripts folder) that is referenced in your 
Task Sequence?

Have you verified that the UDI Wizard step in your Task Sequence is correctly 
referencing your xml file? i.e. cscript.exe 
"%DeployRoot%\Scripts\UDIWizard.wsf" /definition:UDIWizard_Config.xml

Can't really be anything else as the Task Sequence step will just run the 
UDIWizard.wsf in your MDT Toolkit package that contains the relevant definition 
file.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 6:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Cc: mdt...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

Hey All,

I am posting this in SMS and MDT just in case this issue has been seen by 
either groups.

I use the UDI Wizard during my OSD deployment (SCCM 1511, MDT 2013 U2 
(6.3.8330.1000)), and when I make a change to the udiwizard xml 
(UDIWizard_Config.xml) and save it, then redistribute the Package to my DP I 
start up a new deployment and the changes are not saved (or at least not 
deployed during the PXE OSD).

The only thing the Wizard does is have the user put in the computer name and 
the ability to change the OU. The only change I am making is adding another OU 
for them to select.

So I thought maybe it was something with these files.

So I created a whole new deployment with a new MDTPackage. Before distributing 
this to my DP I made my modifications ( I delete all stages except "New 
computer details", add my OUs)
Then I saved it, then distributed it to my DP. Started up a deployment and I 
get the new MDTPackage files but it has all the stages (not just the 1  I kept, 
so it completely ignored my changes)

When I look at the .xml file (on the server) it has exactly what I want, but 
for whatever reason this does not seem to get copied or used during my OSD.

When I look at c:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\PackID\Scripts and look at the 
UDIWizard_Config.xml it has none of the changes I made before I distributed it.

I am not sure what is going on, but this did work before I did my CM1511 and 
MDT 2013 upgrade.

Thanks,
Kevin





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If 

[mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 web frontend

[Thomas Marcussen]

Hi,

Anyone got recommendations or experiences to share regarding web frontends for 
CM2012?
Looking for some to assign collection members "light" management


Venlig hilsen / Best regards

Thomas Marcussen
Security and Cloud Architect

D:  +45 88418792
M:  +45 23896102
E:  t...@comm2ig.dk

COMM2IG A/S
Kokkedal Industripark 104
DK-2980 Kokkedal
+45 70217021
www.comm2ig.dk

[mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

[Mawdsley R.]

Which StageGroup are you making your changes in?

There's a chance your changes are in a different StageGroup then the one being 
called during OSD.

Rich Mawdsley

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: 05 July 2016 00:47
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

So is your Task Sequence referring that MDT package? I'm assuming you have 
checked?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 9:27 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

When I edit the file I am browsing directly to where the MDT package is that is 
referenced.

I am not specifically referencing my udiwizard_config.xml file, I never had to 
do that before and any changes I made would work. It is referencing just the 
UDIWizard.wsf file.

I will add the /definition part and see if that fixes it.

It truly is strange that the files on the c:\ that gets copied does not have 
anything.

Kevin

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Monday, July 4, 2016 6:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [BULK] [mssms] RE: UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my 
configurations
Importance: Low

Have you checked if the UDIWizard_Config.xml is actually in your MDT Toolkit 
package source (specifically in the Scripts folder) that is referenced in your 
Task Sequence?

Have you verified that the UDI Wizard step in your Task Sequence is correctly 
referencing your xml file? i.e. cscript.exe 
"%DeployRoot%\Scripts\UDIWizard.wsf" /definition:UDIWizard_Config.xml

Can't really be anything else as the Task Sequence step will just run the 
UDIWizard.wsf in your MDT Toolkit package that contains the relevant definition 
file.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Tuesday, 5 July 2016 6:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Cc: mdt...@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] UDI Wizard during OSD does not use any of my configurations

Hey All,

I am posting this in SMS and MDT just in case this issue has been seen by 
either groups.

I use the UDI Wizard during my OSD deployment (SCCM 1511, MDT 2013 U2 
(6.3.8330.1000)), and when I make a change to the udiwizard xml 
(UDIWizard_Config.xml) and save it, then redistribute the Package to my DP I 
start up a new deployment and the changes are not saved (or at least not 
deployed during the PXE OSD).

The only thing the Wizard does is have the user put in the computer name and 
the ability to change the OU. The only change I am making is adding another OU 
for them to select.

So I thought maybe it was something with these files.

So I created a whole new deployment with a new MDTPackage. Before distributing 
this to my DP I made my modifications ( I delete all stages except "New 
computer details", add my OUs)
Then I saved it, then distributed it to my DP. Started up a deployment and I 
get the new MDTPackage files but it has all the stages (not just the 1  I kept, 
so it completely ignored my changes)

When I look at the .xml file (on the server) it has exactly what I want, but 
for whatever reason this does not seem to get copied or used during my OSD.

When I look at c:\_SMSTaskSequence\Packages\PackID\Scripts and look at the 
UDIWizard_Config.xml it has none of the changes I made before I distributed it.

I am not sure what is going on, but this did work before I did my CM1511 and 
MDT 2013 upgrade.

Thanks,
Kevin





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a