Re: [music-dsp] IIR Coefficient Switching Issues

2013-11-05 Thread Tom O'Hara


On 04-Nov-13 18:10, Phil Burk wrote:

A different approach is to have two filters in parallel. You can be
listening to one while setting up the other. When the other filter is
stable just cross-fade from one to the other.


And cross-fade both the input and output with a sine/cosine after 
zeroing the states of the new filter.


Tom


--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp


Re: [music-dsp] IIR Coefficient Switching Issues

2013-11-04 Thread Vadim Zavalishin

Hi Chris

Direct forms are not good for coefficient modulation, plus IIRC they 
tend to have precision issues at low cutoffs. I guess, the TPT (ZDF) 
approach can solve your problem completely:

http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/KeepTopology.pdf
(For the 2nd order filters use the modes of the SVF from the same paper)

If you can read Reaktor Core, then here's some additional info:
http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/KeepTopologyRC.pdf

Regards,
Vadim

On 03-Nov-13 04:27, Chris Townsend wrote:

I'm working on an algorithm with some user controlled presets that
adjust various IIR filters under the hood.  This generally works fine,
but I get pops and glitches when switching between certain settings.
The filters that are causing trouble are typically second order hipass
filters with a sub 100Hz cutoff, but with some settings the filters
reconfigure to peaking, shelf and first order hipass types.  Generally
the problem is most noticeable when changing between types.

This appears to be a simple matter of the internal states of the
filter being un-normalized and so large gain chances of the state
variables can occur when coefficients are adjusted.  I read through
some old Music-DSP posts on this topic, but I didn't find a clear
solution that fit my needs.

I'm using 1 pole coefficient smoothing, which helps reduce the
glitches but definitely doesn't get rid of them.  Currently I'm using
DF2 transpose filter topology.  I also tried lattice and a couple
others topologies, but overall that didn't improve things and in some
cases was worse.

If I only needed a second order hipass then I would think a Chamberlin
State Variable Filter would be my best bet, since I found it to be
very adept at handling coefficient changes.  But I'm not sure it will
work for me, since it's not a fully generally filter topology.  I've
looked at using the Kingsbury topology which is very similar in form
to Chamberlin, but has poles that are generalized.  Apparently
Kingsbury's filter is all-pole (no zeros), so would need to tack on
some zeros to make it fully general, but then I'm not sure it would
maintain the nice properties of the Chamberlin filter.

I've also looked at using a ladder filter, which seems like it would
totally solve my problem, since all of the internal states are
normalized.  The only downside is that it's about double the
computational cost of most other filter topologies, but that's not a
huge deal in this case.

There's also the possibility of renormalizing the filter states every
time the coefficients are updated, but that seems complicated and
costly in terms of CPU, since the smoothing updates the coefficients
at a fairly high rate.

I'm also seeing some coefficient quantization issues at high sample
rates, when using DF2T, because I'm dealing with low cutoff
frequencies and using single precision floats.  It looks like
Chamberlin, Kingsbury or Ladder would also perform much better in that
respect.

Any ideas?  Recommendations?

Thanks,
Chris
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp



--
Vadim Zavalishin
Reaktor Application Architect
Native Instruments GmbH
+49-30-611035-0

www.native-instruments.com
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp


Re: [music-dsp] IIR Coefficient Switching Issues

2013-11-04 Thread Vadim Zavalishin

Oh, completely forgot. Here's a step-by-step description of the TPT method:

http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/VAFilterDesign_1.0.3.pdf 
 (A4 format)
http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/VAFilterDesign_1.0.3_A5.pdf 
 (A5 format)


On 04-Nov-13 11:07, Vadim Zavalishin wrote:

Hi Chris

Direct forms are not good for coefficient modulation, plus IIRC they
tend to have precision issues at low cutoffs. I guess, the TPT (ZDF)
approach can solve your problem completely:
http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/KeepTopology.pdf

(For the 2nd order filters use the modes of the SVF from the same paper)

If you can read Reaktor Core, then here's some additional info:
http://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/ni_media/downloads/pdf/KeepTopologyRC.pdf


Regards,
Vadim



--
Vadim Zavalishin
Reaktor Application Architect
Native Instruments GmbH
+49-30-611035-0

www.native-instruments.com
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp


[music-dsp] IIR Coefficient Switching Issues

2013-11-02 Thread Chris Townsend
I'm working on an algorithm with some user controlled presets that
adjust various IIR filters under the hood.  This generally works fine,
but I get pops and glitches when switching between certain settings.
The filters that are causing trouble are typically second order hipass
filters with a sub 100Hz cutoff, but with some settings the filters
reconfigure to peaking, shelf and first order hipass types.  Generally
the problem is most noticeable when changing between types.

This appears to be a simple matter of the internal states of the
filter being un-normalized and so large gain chances of the state
variables can occur when coefficients are adjusted.  I read through
some old Music-DSP posts on this topic, but I didn't find a clear
solution that fit my needs.

I'm using 1 pole coefficient smoothing, which helps reduce the
glitches but definitely doesn't get rid of them.  Currently I'm using
DF2 transpose filter topology.  I also tried lattice and a couple
others topologies, but overall that didn't improve things and in some
cases was worse.

If I only needed a second order hipass then I would think a Chamberlin
State Variable Filter would be my best bet, since I found it to be
very adept at handling coefficient changes.  But I'm not sure it will
work for me, since it's not a fully generally filter topology.  I've
looked at using the Kingsbury topology which is very similar in form
to Chamberlin, but has poles that are generalized.  Apparently
Kingsbury's filter is all-pole (no zeros), so would need to tack on
some zeros to make it fully general, but then I'm not sure it would
maintain the nice properties of the Chamberlin filter.

I've also looked at using a ladder filter, which seems like it would
totally solve my problem, since all of the internal states are
normalized.  The only downside is that it's about double the
computational cost of most other filter topologies, but that's not a
huge deal in this case.

There's also the possibility of renormalizing the filter states every
time the coefficients are updated, but that seems complicated and
costly in terms of CPU, since the smoothing updates the coefficients
at a fairly high rate.

I'm also seeing some coefficient quantization issues at high sample
rates, when using DF2T, because I'm dealing with low cutoff
frequencies and using single precision floats.  It looks like
Chamberlin, Kingsbury or Ladder would also perform much better in that
respect.

Any ideas?  Recommendations?

Thanks,
Chris
--
dupswapdrop -- the music-dsp mailing list and website:
subscription info, FAQ, source code archive, list archive, book reviews, dsp 
links
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp