[mb-style] RFC STYLE-97: Move medley to an attribute of performance of
Expiration: 2012-02-28 This RFC is to move the “medley” relationship to an attribute of the “performance of” relatonship. More details in jira, http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-97 This was not previously discussed. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC-346. Style/Language/Vietnamese : Punctuation change
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 20:38, jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.org wrote: (sorry for my possibly awful English below) I’d like to refine last change for the Vietnamese guideline page, specifically the punctuation part of it. I object to this. From the last time this was discussed, it was fairly obvious (to me) that the English style is by a large margin the biggest both in print and online. See http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Talk:Style/Language/Vietnamese#Reference_.28no_space.29 Having just come back from vacation in Hanoi (thus the slow reply) I can say (anecdotally) that every single item with print (mostly food) that I have brought back uses English style punctuation. I don't think it's feasible to defer to the cover for something that is so hard to judge: how much space before the punctuation is enough to justify a half-width space? The result will simply be inconsistent, with most track lists not being vetted against a cover and editors just picking the style they prefer. There is a very simple solution to this, similar to the capitalization problem: Use a Picard plugin to convert to the style you prefer while leaving the database internally consistent and consistent with common usage. -- Philip Jägenstedt ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-97: Move medley to an attribute of performance of
On 02/21/2012 04:47 PM, Alex Mauer wrote: Expiration: 2012-02-28 This RFC is to move the “medley” relationship to an attribute of the “performance of” relatonship. More details in jira, http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-97 This was not previously discussed. Proposed update to “performance of” relationship page at http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Hawke/Proposal/Performance-medley ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-97: Move medley to an attribute of performance of
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Medley_Relationship_Type will also need
updating if the separate recording-work relationship goes away.
Currently the displayed phrase is {partial} {live} {instrumental}
{cover} performance of, where would medley go in here?
This will require one of the devs to write a conversion script, so it
may take some time to be implemented. An alternative would be to add the
attributes to the existing medley relationship.
Alex Mauer wrote:
Expiration: 2012-02-28
This RFC is to move the “medley” relationship to an attribute of the
“performance of” relatonship.
More details in jira, http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-97
This was not previously discussed.
You were discussing it on IRC:
http://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz/2012/2012-02/2012-02-21.html#T22-24-38-528382
At one point there was a discussion about whether partial should be
used or not which may be something people here want to consider.
Nikki
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
