Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-279: Add "Place of Worship" as place type
On 01/01/2014 04:16 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote: We have over 50 churches already, and with so much classical music being recorded in them it's only going to go up. Using "Other" for it when it's so obviously a type seems silly, so I'd like us to add it. Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-279 Expected RFV date: Jan 8 To me, "venue" is a generic term that covers pretty much anywhere music might be played for an audience (unless there's an audience in the studio during recording, I guess). It sounds like you're thinking of "venue" as being specifically clubs and theatres and those sorts of purpose-built places. I'm not sure finer granularity would improve what we already have. Alex / caller#6 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] Pre-RFC: Make instruments entities
I still think that similar systems should be used for Genres and Instruments (seeing as they're both tree-based systems), so I'd like to wait until the developer decide on how they'll tackle Genres before anything happens with instruments. What I'd like to see if both Instruments and Genres as entities, which aren't created by a formal "add" process, but are formed from tags/words entered by users - a "bottom-up" approach, where user input decides what instruments and genres should be in the system. I've written this down here, and we talked about it a little at the last summit, but didn't agree on anything: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fRfpALAX5D0RAjF7upbPcaAR70OIsQk1jNOW5uuf5wQ/edit?usp=sharing ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-279: Add "Place of Worship" as place type
Is "Place of Worship" generic enough? Some religions don't worship a deity - in this case they'd just be "Religious Buildings" (eg. Buddhism). Perhaps "Community Building" would work too, for non-religious buildings which are considered important locally? ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type
+1 Would Nippon Budokan fall under this classification even though it’s hardly ever used for sports nowadays? On Jan 1, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Maurits wrote: > Sounds logical enough to have them. +1 > > Op woensdag 1 januari 2014 13:18:15, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren schreef: >> Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional >> sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a >> type? >> >> Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-278 >> Expected RFV date: Jan 8 >> >> -- >> Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren >> >> >> ___ >> MusicBrainz-style mailing list >> MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org >> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > > ___ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-279: Add "Place of Worship" as place type
+1 I seem to remember seeing a recording of THE ALFEE performing at the church on the Meiji Gakuin University campus. On Jan 1, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2014/1/1 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > We have over 50 churches already, and with so much classical music being > recorded in them it's only going to go up. Using "Other" for it when it's so > obviously a type seems silly, so I'd like us to add it. > > Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-279 > Expected RFV date: Jan 8 > > +1 > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > ___ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type
Sounds logical enough to have them. +1 Op woensdag 1 januari 2014 13:18:15, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren schreef: > Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional > sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a > type? > > Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-278 > Expected RFV date: Jan 8 > > -- > Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > > > ___ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-279: Add "Place of Worship" as place type
2014/1/1 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > We have over 50 churches already, and with so much classical music being > recorded in them it's only going to go up. Using "Other" for it when it's > so obviously a type seems silly, so I'd like us to add it. > > Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-279 > Expected RFV date: Jan 8 > +1 -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-276: Remove attributes from the performing orchestra relationship
2014/1/1 symphonick > Yes, please make this go away. > > I'm not sure the situation Frederic describes needs fixing anymore, since > different arrangements are different works now? > That said, maybe there should be a "members of group performed" attribute, > for situations where the performers are credited in that way. > Good idea, a "members of group performed" attribute would be much better, I believe there would be much less chances of it being misused. And a happy new year to all of you. > Happy new year! -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
[mb-style] RFC STYLE-278: Add "Stadium/Arena" as place type
Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a "venue" in the traditional sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a type? Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-278 Expected RFV date: Jan 8 -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV2: STYLE-97: Move "medley" to an attribute of "recording of"
Woohoo! Thanks, and a very happy new year to you and all. I'll update the wiki and let you know how I get on On 1 Jan 2014 10:53, "Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren" wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Tom Crocker wrote: > >> >> It's over two months since this passed and code is in place to convert >> the medleys across. Any chance the new attribute can be in place before the >> New Year? >> > > Apparently not, since I completely forgot. I've added this now, hopefully > it'll work fine. > > ___ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
[mb-style] RFC STYLE-279: Add "Place of Worship" as place type
We have over 50 churches already, and with so much classical music being recorded in them it's only going to go up. Using "Other" for it when it's so obviously a type seems silly, so I'd like us to add it. Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-279 Expected RFV date: Jan 8 -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFV2: STYLE-97: Move "medley" to an attribute of "recording of"
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Tom Crocker wrote: > > It's over two months since this passed and code is in place to convert the > medleys across. Any chance the new attribute can be in place before the New > Year? > Apparently not, since I completely forgot. I've added this now, hopefully it'll work fine. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-276: Remove attributes from the performing orchestra relationship
Yes, please make this go away. I'm not sure the situation Frederic describes needs fixing anymore, since different arrangements are different works now? That said, maybe there should be a "members of group performed" attribute, for situations where the performers are credited in that way. And a happy new year to all of you. 2013/12/27 Frederic Da Vitoria > 2013/12/27 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > >> >> The option to select "chamber" or "symphony" ends up being pretty much a >> random "well it's on the orchestra name so it will probably be right" pick, >> and it doesn't really offer any useful info. Can we get rid of it? (I have >> seen many other classical editors share this opinion of the attribute, but >> is there anyone who thinks it's actually useful?) >> >> I would like to have an artist type "orchestra" and possibly also >> "chamber orchestra" and "symphony orchestra", but that's a separate issue >> :) It's the only place where this kind of info belongs though IMO. >> >> >> Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-276 >> Expected RFV date is Jan 3. >> > > I believe this was meant for example for (unspecified subparts of) > symphony orchestras performing as a chamber orchestra of a chamber music > score, as opposed to the full orchestra performing an upscaled version of > the same score. Not sure I am being quite clear here. And I agree that the > implementation was not very easy to understand.As long as this situation is > covered in some other way, I agree with removing those attributes. > > -- > Frederic Da Vitoria > (davitof) > > Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - > http://www.april.org > > ___ > MusicBrainz-style mailing list > MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org > http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style > -- /symphonick ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
