Re: [mb-style] Haute-Contre
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2014/1/11 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria > > wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree, or is it there in a >>> translation I don't recognize? >>> >> >> It's missing, unless you're willing to call it a countertenor. >> > > Seems to me haute-contre and countertenor are different, and Wikipedia > agrees. > > Hm, it has been a long time since I haven't done a RFC in MB. Let's see. > This means Ticket + RFC. Finding 5 releases with a haute-contre should be > pretty easy. According to http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Proposals , I should > also suggest a matching documentation, but I couldn't find any wiki page > for the voice parts. > Finding a few releases would be useful, yeah, plus a description of the vocal type (wikipedia should work) to show it's a distinct thing. Don't think specific docs are needed for this one. And heh, this remind me we also miss treble/boy soprano. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] Haute-Contre
2014/1/11 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree, or is it there in a >> translation I don't recognize? >> > > It's missing, unless you're willing to call it a countertenor. > Seems to me haute-contre and countertenor are different, and Wikipedia agrees. Hm, it has been a long time since I haven't done a RFC in MB. Let's see. This means Ticket + RFC. Finding 5 releases with a haute-contre should be pretty easy. According to http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Proposals , I should also suggest a matching documentation, but I couldn't find any wiki page for the voice parts. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] Haute-Contre
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > Hello, > > Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree, or is it there in a > translation I don't recognize? > It's missing, unless you're willing to call it a countertenor. ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
[mb-style] Haute-Contre
Hello, Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree, or is it there in a translation I don't recognize? -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Re: [mb-style] RFC STYLE-280: Personal label relationship type
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Rachel Dwight wrote: > Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-280 > Wiki: > http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Personal_label_relationship_type > > A lot of artists have personal labels that handle the rights to their > works. Some even have their own release labels (e.g. Michael Jackson and > MJJ Music). > At present the only relationship type we have for this is “founder,” which > is largely inaccurate. > This looks fine to me. +1 ___ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
