2014-10-20 21:52 GMT+02:00 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Rachel Dwight < > hibiscuskazen...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:00 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < >> reosare...@musicbrainz.org> wrote: >> >> A lot of orchestral releases give information on the orchestra's >> leader/concertmaster for that recording. Similarly, orchestra sites fairly >> often provide information about the concertmaster position. As WP says, >> "The concertmaster [...] is the second-most significant person in an >> orchestra" - so we probably should allow to record this information. For >> that I'd like to add artist-recording and artist-release "concertmaster" >> relationships, similarly to the conductor ones, plus a "concertmaster" >> attribute to the artist-artist "member of" relationship, to relate the >> people to the orchestras (since concertmasters are usually first violin or >> whatever, but in any case a member of the orchestra). >> >> Does anyone feel any of the two changes would be problematic, and if so, >> why and what would be a better way of storing this info? >> >> >> I don’t really see any problems with it. >> (Is it too soon to +1?) >> > > Well, with the new style process there's no real schedule or need for > +1ing as such, although knowing that people think the change is ok is never > a bad thing so I can eventually take a decision :) > OK, since you asked for it: I don't see any reason for not doing this either. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org
_______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
