Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message that you sent to another Outlook user! This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? Maybe, but once a message enters an SMTP stream, it tends to get delivered permanently. :) -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson Convex Division |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message that you sent to another Outlook user! This feature works only if the message you're trying to recall hasn't yet been opened by the receiver. You can choose to simply delete unread copies of the message, or you can replace unread copies of the message with a brand new message. You can also request to be notified whether the message recall was successful. Once you've selected the options you want, click OK, and Outlook attempts to recall the message you selected. Hmm, I wonder how one can abuse this? But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? I believe this is only for within an intranet type network. I don't think it works for the Internet. -Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 06:54:25PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: Hmm, I wonder how one can abuse this? But wouldn't that be another nice feature for mutt? Ralf, you should lock your screen while away from the computer. I can't believe you actually typed this :) Ok, the eclipse burned my brain, but this is actually the stupidest idea M$ EVER had, and so I thought I'd share my thoughts... -- Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried. PGP signature
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature? -- Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb The secret of flying is simple: Throw yourself at the ground and miss. PGP signature
how to reload settings ?
Hi, is there a way to reload .muttrc without exiting mutt ? Ciao, Bjørn -- o_) Bjoern Buergerhttp://bbuerger.home.pages.de .-. _/\ .--- --/---\-/(/-' Linux User Group Braunschweig (LUG - BS) `-'http://www.tu-bs.de/initiativen/LUG/
Re: how to reload settings ?
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 09:05:27PM +0200, Bjoern Buerger wrote: Hi, is there a way to reload .muttrc without exiting mutt ? :source ~/.muttrc (or the general equivalent). Note that this doesn't really answer your question - it isn't like reloading from scratch (by exiting and re-starting mutt). It just reloads the .muttrc and applies the settings on top of what it already has. That could be a problem with hooks, but should be just fine for options. David -- David Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/ +---+ "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
Re: how to reload settings ?
Hi Bjoern! [ Haettest Du auch auf der SuSE-Liste fragen duerfen! ;-) ] On Wed, 11 Aug 1999, Bjoern Buerger wrote: is there a way to reload .muttrc without exiting mutt ? I´ve collected some answers to this question appeared in this mailing list. So "Thank You!": Mike, Tim, David, Christian and Byrial. == Does mutt have a facility to reload its settings from .muttrc without quitting and re-running it? Depends on what you've changed. I sometimes want to make a change while I'm busy working through my mail and don't always want to leave it until I've finished reading my mail. Most of the time, I'm making a one-line change to the file, and I simple cut-n-paste the new command at the ":" prompt in Mutt. Then I can see what effect the change has. If you're modifying send-hooks, though, there isn't any un-send-hook command that I'm aware of, so it's difficult to remove and reapply them without restarting Mutt. == You can load your .muttrc with the command ":source .muttrc". However, this will not actually reload your settings. It will load the settings in .muttrc in top of any current settings. For testing some changes (especially some hooks), I've found no other solution than to quit and restart mutt so as to get a clean .muttrc load from scratch. == I use 'folder-hook . source ~/.mutt/muttrc' to do this, then any time I change my muttrc, I do a c!return. == Put the following line in your .muttrc and you can reload the .muttrc with ESC r whenever you want. macro index \er ":source ~/.muttrc\n" "Reload muttrc" macro pager \er ":source ~/.muttrc\n" "Reload muttrc" == You can reset all variables to their default values with ":reset all" before sourcing .muttrc, but other configuration (key bindings, macros, colors, hooks etc.) cannot be reset in a simple way. -- Carsten Raas -- Xantener Str. 13 -- 50733 Koeln Privat: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (02 21) 7 60 61 00 Uni:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (02 21) 4 70-42 04
ÿñh®Êÿ®^KþZÞ? characters appended to mails?
This question surely must have surfaced at least once before but I wasn't there to see the answer.. So what is this: ÿñh®Êÿ®^KþZÞ?«^ëm?[b?ú ~¶¦zWb? ÿ?+-z^?ìz÷§?(,¶^[m§ÿÿÃ^Lÿ~[ ýÙ??¨¥?xÿ?Ù¥ I get it in a few mails, in this case from a message that comes from a Lotus email program. Is it a Lotus version of a vcard or something? If so is there some mutt mime plugin to handle this? Morten
Re: Feature request (or yet another brainfart by M$?)
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:26:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such feature. Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature? And now, for your amusement, i can inform you that it already does :-) How? Easy, simply send a new mail like this: | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: FOLDER INTERNAL DATA, IGNORE | Supersedes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Expires: Wed, 10 Aug 1999 14:00:43 +0100 (CEST) | | This is an folder internal cancel message, please ignore me :-) And have the recipient have the following line in his .muttrc: push D~S|~E\n (not tested :-) CU, Sec -- The UNIX Guru's View of Sex: # unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep
