Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
Hi David! On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote: Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the header 'X-Status: D'. Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good. Alas, my current mail filter is a home-brewed perl script, which is easy for me to tweak and modify, since I wrote it, but I fear it might be a bit of trouble for others to make sense of it. (Cut to save) That is no problem. I get enough spam these days so maybe I can do something myself. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 0h and 28m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
Hi Rejo! On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote: ++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima: My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good. I have same kind of setup. I have procmail check for a some things that may point to spam. Other, similar, checks are also done. The filter checks for spammers that use insecure systems or messages without RFC822 and RFC1123 valid Message-Id or Date fields. It checks to see if the mail was addressed to a spamtrap. It checks to see if the used mail servers are in the ORBS, RSS or RBL. If it finds a thing that does not look correct, it'll add a X-Note field with the problem found. In Mutt i have these X-Note headers light up in bright white (while other header fields are in green), so i can eassily not if something is, possibly, wrong. Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info. Thanks, will have a butchers. Sean -- GPG ID (5.x) 92B9D0CF Linux User: #124682 ICQ: 679813 To get my GPG (PGP 5.x) Key send me an empty email with retrieve as the subject My Current Uptime is 0d, 0h and 29m on Linux 2.2.13 It said "Needs Windows 95 or better". So I installed Linux...
Re: Printing
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 08:51:12AM +0100, Pieter Wenk thus spoke: Hello to all, How do I tell mutt, that I should like to to have a print ? I ckecked my muttrc concerning the key-bindings. Found nothing. Tried "p"...no action Assuming it's not built in anywhere (I'm not checking the manual at the moment), you could always just make a macro that does a pipe of the message to lpr... Something tells me you should look at the manual...there's bound to be a print -somewhere- but barring that, this would work. mark- -- Fairlight- |||[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fairlight Consulting __/\__ ||| "I'm talking for free... | http://www.fairlite.com ||| It's a New Religion..." | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \/||| PGP Public Key available via finger @iglou, or Key servers
Re: Alternates, Groups, Lists, and Work
On 1999-11-12 08:16:58 +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote: Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info. Looks quite interesting. Please donate it to dotfiles.com Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 PGP signature
Re: Printing
Fairlight [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 12 Nov 1999: How do I tell mutt, that I should like to to have a print ? Tried "p"...no action Check the value of the $print quadoption. I have a hunch it might be set to "no". Default is "ask-no". Another alternative is that you have it set to "yes" but your print command doesn't know what to do with the message, or doesn't do the right thing (see below). Something tells me you should look at the manual...there's bound to be a print -somewhere- but barring that, this would work. p by default prints the message. In other words, it calls up the print command defined in $print_command (default "lpr" according to the manual) with the message text to print in STDIN. I believe the headers are formatted and weeded according to the normal Mutt header instructions, and possibly according to what you see on screen (so if have view full headers enabled, it would also print all of them) -- I don't know about the latter and didn't try it out. Hope this helps, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / Don't force it, use a bigger hammer.
Re: Re: Printing
On ven, 12 nov 1999, Fairlight wrote: Assuming it's not built in anywhere (I'm not checking the manual at the moment), you could always just make a macro that does a pipe of the message to lpr... Something tells me you should look at the manual...there's bound to be a print -somewhere- but barring that, this would work. Hm...well yes. Now I have the full manual. Wearing glasses, I could not see an entry "explaining" how to perform out of mutt such a fundamental job as printing, any second class E-Mailer does by default in hitting just a printer icon. Regards -- / / (_) __ __ Pieter Wenk / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / Vevey/Switzerland //_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
query_command for uiuc's ph/qi
I hadn't seen a query_command program for qi on www.mutt.org, so I
wrote one. (I know they're around, but I was blinded or something and
I missed them.) I particularly didn't know about the one on Brandon
Long's archive that handles multiple servers, but mine handles them
better anyway. :)
We don't have many mutt users here, but I haven't heard anything from
any of them, so I'll let all of you try it out anyway.
It's a perl script, I'm afraid. There's a nested hash at the top that
defines your server(s) and parameters that apply to them individually.
At uchicago.edu we have two standard servers, so this was kinda
necessary. You can turn it to your advantage, too: I put nwu.edu in my
copy, as well, since we're in the same general neighborhood.
The reason I think this is better, btw, are that 1) the awful nested
hash lets you set parameters for each server independently; 2) this one
is a little smarter about using the info available via `siteinfo' to
fill in blanks; and 3) it tries hard to give useful commentary on the
matches.
It doesn't require a client or the perl Net::Ph (or whatever) module.
--
-D. [EMAIL PROTECTED]"Tuna Casserole. Ingredients: 1 large casserole dish.
NS/ENSA Place [the dish] in a cold oven. Place a chair facing
Networking Services the oven and sit in it forever. Think about how hungry
Uchicago.Com you are. When night falls, do not turn on the light."
#!/opt/bin/perl
##
## [EMAIL PROTECTED], evil qi guy
##
###
## Configurable parameters:
## List all Qi servers to check.
## server = hostname of server ($)
## port= service/port, if not the default (csnet-ns/105) ($)
## fullname= field containing full name on this server ($)
## dfields = fields with descriptive text about person ([])
## capnames= do names need to be coerced into proper capitalization? ($)
## shownull= Show records with empty mailbox fields? ($)
@QISVRS = ( {
server = "ns.uchicago.edu",
port= undef,
fullname= "name",
dfields = \@INFOFIELDS,
capnames= 1,
shownulls = 1,
},
{
server = "alumni.uchicago.edu",
port= undef,
fullname= "name",
dfields = \@INFOFIELDS,
capnames= 1,
shownulls = 1,
},
# {
# server = "ns.nwu.edu",
# port= undef,
# fullname= "name",
# dfields = [qw(title department curriculum text)],
# capnames= 1,
# shownulls = 0,
# },
## UIUC is s l o w
# {
# server = "ns.uiuc.edu",
# port= undef,
# fullname= "name",
# dfields = [qw(title department curriculum text)],
# capnames= 1,
# shownulls = 0,
# },
);
## Fields to take commentary text from, in precedence order.
@INFOFIELDS = qw(
title
appointment
department
curriculum
text
);
## No more config after this.
###
use Symbol;
use Socket;
use Sys::Hostname;
($A0 = $0) =~ s:.*/::;
sub max {
my (@all) = @_;
my ($x);
$x = 0;
for (@all) {
$x = $_ if ($_ $x);
}
return $x;
}
sub QiConnect {
my ($host, $port) = @_;
my @pw;
my $sock = gensym;
my $port = getservbyname($port, 'tcp')
|| getservbyport($port, 'tcp')
|| getservbyname('csnet-ns', 'tcp')
|| getservbyname('ns', 'tcp')
|| getservbyport(105, 'tcp');
my $sin = sockaddr_in($port, inet_aton($host));
socket($sock, PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, getprotobyname('tcp'));
connect($sock, $sin);
select $sock; $| = 1; select STDOUT;
@pw = getpwuid($);
print $sock "hello ", $pw[0], "\@", hostname, " [$0]\n";
while ($sock) {
last if (/^[2-9]/);
}
return $sock;
}
if ($#ARGV != 0) {
print "$A0: usage: $A0 query_exp\n";
exit 1;
}
($SEARCH = $ARGV[0]) =~ s/\s+/\*/g;
$nresults = 0;
for $svr (@QISVRS) {
@matches = ();
$Qi = QiConnect($svr-{server}, $svr-{port});
print $Qi "siteinfo\n";
IO: while ($Qi) {
last IO if (/^[2-9]/);
chomp;
($r, $n, $f, $v) = split(/\s*:\s*/, $_);
if ($f =~ /^maildomain$/) {
$svr-{maildomain} = "\@$v";
} elsif ($f =~ /^mailfield$/) {
Re: Re: Printing
On ven, 12 nov 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote: Hello Mikko, p by default prints the message. In other words, it calls up the print command defined in $print_command (default "lpr" according to the manual) with the message text to print in STDIN. I believe the headers are formatted and weeded according to the normal Mutt header instructions, and possibly according to what you see on screen (so if have view full headers enabled, it would also print all of them) -- I don't know about the latter and didn't try it out. This is what I have in .muttrc with regards to printing: # Soll Mutt vor dem Drucken einer Mail nachfragen ? set print=ask-yes # Drucker - Kommandos set print_command="a2ps -nn -ns -nH -p -1 -B -F10 -nL | lpr" Now, normally I thought with "p" the printing should start ? Regards -- / / (_) __ __ Pieter Wenk / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / Vevey/Switzerland //_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Re: Re: Printing
Pieter Wenk writes: Hm...well yes. Now I have the full manual. Wearing glasses, I could not see an entry "explaining" how to perform out of mutt such a fundamental job as printing, any second class E-Mailer does by default in hitting just a printer icon. Perhaps it's time to check your glasses prescription. Cut-n-paste from the manual appended below (just pulled up the manual.txt file, and searched on "print"). Yes, it is "p", as you tried, and the defaults should work to first order - assuming your system admin has set up a default printer queue - but what is set up in your .muttrc? Perhaps there's some goop in there that's messing you up. No icons - yuck! I use a text mode mailer to avoid icons :) FWIW, here's my own .muttrc customization, for my own local printer and using a2ps to pretty-print the email: set print_cmd="a2ps -g -Email -P lp7" set print=ask-yes # ask me if I really want to print messages -from manual.txt-- 6.3.118. print Type: quadoption Default: ask-no Controls whether or not Mutt asks for confirmation before printing. This is useful for people (like me) who accidentally hit ``p'' often. 6.3.119. print_command Type: string Default: lpr This specifies the command pipe that should be used to print messages. -- Alec Habig, Boston University Particle Astrophysics Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hep.bu.edu/~habig/
ftp problems to ftp.mutt.org
Is anyone having problems connecting to it? This is what i get after a simple traceroute: traceroute to ftp.mutt.org (134.95.80.189), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 gp-rtr-1.chatlink.com (205.139.105.254) 3.256 ms 1.552 ms 1.490 ms 2 core1-ashland-s1-3-4.mind.net (206.151.156.17) 11.150 ms 9.078 ms 8.777 ms 3 border1-serial2-2.Sacramento.cw.net (204.70.165.17) 37.802 ms 49.383 ms 56.891 ms 4 core1-fddi-0.Sacramento.cw.net (204.70.164.17) 45.432 ms 36.810 ms 37.349 ms 5 bordercore3.Washington.cw.net (166.48.40.1) 120.403 ms 293.955 ms 150.258 ms 6 dfn.Washington.cw.net (166.48.41.250) 120.833 ms 113.407 ms 112.429 ms 7 IR-New-York1.WiN-IP.DFN.DE (188.1.144.197) 120.793 ms 132.154 ms 139.532 ms 8 IR-New-York2.WiN-IP.DFN.DE (188.1.145.2) 110.337 ms 108.441 ms 109.126 ms 9 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 114.446 ms 110.899 ms 113.534 ms 10 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 113.006 ms 107.584 ms 107.785 ms 11 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 107.730 ms 107.619 ms 109.582 ms 12 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 107.418 ms 107.980 ms 108.182 ms 13 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 107.093 ms 107.351 ms 110.070 ms 14 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 108.252 ms 129.802 ms 124.019 ms 15 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 110.417 ms 115.011 ms 107.902 ms 16 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 109.986 ms 186.945 ms 107.757 ms 17 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 110.668 ms 110.268 ms 108.357 ms 18 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 107.608 ms 108.591 ms 123.150 ms 19 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 114.652 ms 109.835 ms 108.245 ms 20 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 109.079 ms 109.672 ms 109.387 ms 21 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 109.280 ms 109.211 ms 107.781 ms 22 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 115.362 ms 112.782 ms 108.600 ms 23 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 110.553 ms 111.577 ms 110.293 ms 24 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 114.399 ms 125.804 ms 109.094 ms 25 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 111.275 ms 109.426 ms 110.285 ms 26 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 113.205 ms 110.525 ms 108.241 ms 27 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 109.268 ms 108.523 ms 109.808 ms 28 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 115.178 ms 110.547 ms 110.420 ms 29 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 112.526 ms 111.764 ms 109.744 ms 30 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 109.029 ms 110.888 ms 109.842 ms -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can there be too many color definitions?
Debian's /etc/Muttrc is a complete disaster in my experience. It almost put me off mutt when I first tried it. It's probably a good idea to delete the file altogether. Hm, good idea, but that doesn't answer whether I found a bug in mutt. Any developers reading this? Ciao, Andy. -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://andy.spiegl.de Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key o _ _ _ - __o __o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) --- _`\,__`\,__(_) (_)/_\_| \ _|/' \/ -- (_)/ (_) (_)/ (_) (_)(_) (_)(_)' _\o_ ~~~ Sweater, n.: A garment worn by a child when its mother feels chilly.
Re: ftp problems to ftp.mutt.org
On 1999-11-12 02:34:56 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote: 29 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 112.526 ms 111.764 ms 109.744 ms 30 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 109.029 ms 110.888 ms 109.842 ms That's bad. It does essentially mean that the German research network's international connections are partially down. Nothing anyone on this list can do something about... -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Re: [mutt] Deleting all attachments matching regexp
Hi! How can I tell mutt to colorize *and* eg underline something? For example, I'd like to have error messages in red and bold face, links in some color and underlined, and so on. Yours, Rüdiger. -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.umass.edu/~kuhlmann/
Since we have PGP support...
I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? (I just had a really nifty majordomo idea, but that's a little *too* off-topic.) -Rich -- -- Rich Lafferty --- Sysadmin/Programmer, Information and Instructional Technology Services Concordia University, Montreal, QC (514) 848-7625 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PGP signature
text/plain not displayed automatically
Hi, when I read the attached mail mutt only displays the signature and tells me it can't find an entry for text/html. I have to view the attachments to see the text/plain part. Any idea what's going wrong? Thanks in advance Martin mutt -version Mutt 1.0i (1999-10-22) Copyright (C) 1996-9 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 2.0.36 [using ncurses 4.2] Compile options: -DOMAIN -HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK -USE_IMAP -USE_POP +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_PGP2 -BUFFY_SIZE -EXACT_ADDRESS +ENABLE_NLS SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/spool/mail" SHAREDIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" ISPELL="/usr/bin/ispell" _PGPPATH="/home/ms/bin/pgp" _PGPV2PATH="/home/ms/bin/pgp" -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive at http://www.eGroups.com/list/swing PGP signature
Re: Since we have PGP support...
On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 PGP signature
Re: Since we have PGP support...
Hi ! On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? or http://www.keyserver.net ? Christian -- There are three ways to get something done: (1) Do it yourself. (2) Hire someone to do it for you. (3) Forbid your kids to do it.
Re: Since we have PGP support...
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? If you're using gnupg, you can configure it to fetch unknown keys from a keyserver... Dave -- Dave Holland | "If a site has pages that cause your browser Systems Manager|to restart, don't go there again" -- Microsoft Incyte Europe | Cambridge, UK |
Re: Since we have PGP support...
On 1999-11-12 16:05:17 +0100, Christian Gall wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? or http://www.keyserver.net ? I didn't knew this, but have to admit it's flashy. But it's not networked with pgp.net (it doesn't have my keys)... :-( Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 PGP signature
Re: Since we have PGP support...
On 1999-11-12 16:21:23 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: On 1999-11-12 16:05:17 +0100, Christian Gall wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? or http://www.keyserver.net ? I didn't knew this, but have to admit it's flashy. But it's not networked with pgp.net (it doesn't have my keys)... :-( It has some, but they are a bit older. Seems they do a keyring download from pgp.net every now and then... Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Grazer Straße 8, D-28359 Bremen Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10 PGP signature
Re: Since we have PGP support...
Quoting Dave Holland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:17:48PM +: On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote: I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ? Yeah, I've got a handful of keyserver urls, was just wondering if I was missing out on something else :-) If you're using gnupg, you can configure it to fetch unknown keys from a keyserver... Now *that* I didn't know. Thanks! -Rich -- -- Rich Lafferty --- Sysadmin/Programmer, Instructional and Information Technology Services Concordia University, Montreal, QC (514) 848-7625 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Since we have PGP support...
On Fre, 12 Nov 1999, Rich Lafferty wrote: (I just had a really nifty majordomo idea, but that's a little *too* off-topic.) Maybe you can fix that "sh: pgp not found" error first ;-) Dirk
Re: alternates_work
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So if everyone has a mail filter then why use "alternates" at all? Because $alternates has a lot less to do with filtering incoming mail than it has to do with getting the correct From: address when you reply to mail, etc. In my eyes, the main point of $alternates is to keep my own address from showing up in any group-replies that I do. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Alternates
Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates? alternates dre@chronic\.net alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added to Mutt, a short survey of the then-current Mutt users showed that everyone thought it would be just fine to make a single regexp that matched all addresses. So there you have it, the democratic process at work. :) Does that just look much cleaner? Yes, it does. Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wishlist? No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list? -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: just another send-hook question
Richard P. Groenewegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. Isn't there a pattern modifier "^" that means "only"? send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' That matches only if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient on the To: header. Note that the Cc: header is not checked. If you really meant "only recipient of the message," you'd want ^~C instead. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Alternates
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: :Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : : Wishlist? : :No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list? I just did. It took a while to find it, and it's actually located under Sven's home page and not the Mutt home page. -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clueless about NLS (was: Umlauts again)
I simply cannot get Mutt to show German characters in the pager. The characters either show up as ?'s or (worse yet) as Cyrillic-looking letters. Even if I set LANG=de, the German menu items have the same Cyrillic letters in them. I've enabled NLS in Mutt. My .muttrc file contains the line set charset="iso-8859-1" Dirk Pirschel's suggestion: Mutt will only display iso-latin1 chars if you set locale appropriate. try LANG = en_US.iso88591 gives the Cyrillic letters. Nothing I have set LANG, LANGUAGE or LC_CTYPE to changes this behavior, nor does choosing different charsets in .muttrc. I've also tried --enable-locales-fix, but no difference. Maybe my charsets are missing/corrupted. I don't even know what to look for, hence the title of this note. Any pointers to a NLS tutorial will be much appreciated, as will be any fixes for my little problem. Howard Arons -- Powered by SuSE Linux 5.2 -- Upgraded to kernel 2.0.36 Communications by Mutt 1.0i
Re: just another send-hook question
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:10:25 +0100, Richard P. Groenewegen wrote: Hi, Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want something like send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only recipient. See the section in the manual named "Pattern Modifier". send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'whatever' On a related note: how do I limit to all messages send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but nobody else :l^~C foo@bar\.com (or to me, but nobody else)? :l^~p -- Byrial
Re: Can there be too many color definitions?
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:36:08 +0100, Andy Spiegl wrote: Hm, good idea, but that doesn't answer whether I found a bug in mutt. Any developers reading this? There is a maximum number of color definitions which is imposed by the terminal handling library (curses or slang). When you make a new color definition, mutt will check if the limit is reached and if this is the case it will silently use the "normal" color instead of defining a new one. -- Byrial
Re: text/plain not displayed automatically
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 15:26:56 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote: Hi, when I read the attached mail mutt only displays the signature and tells me it can't find an entry for text/html. I have to view the attachments to see the text/plain part. Any idea what's going wrong? Yes. The mail is of type "multipart/alternative" with 3 parts: - The normal text/plain part - The same text in a text/html part - The signature in anoter text/plain part All 3 parts should have alternative versions of the same information, but they don't in this case. Mutt does the right thing by displaying the last of the alternative parts. RFC 2046 says: the order of body parts is significant. In this case, the alternatives appear in an order of increasing faithfulness to the original content. In general, the best choice is the LAST part of a type supported by the recipient system's local environment. -- Byrial
Re: Clueless about NLS (was: Umlauts again)
Howard Arons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I simply cannot get Mutt to show German characters in the pager. The characters either show up as ?'s or (worse yet) as Cyrillic-looking letters. Even if I set LANG=de, the German menu items have the same Cyrillic letters in them. Are you running Mutt on the console? In an xterm? What font do you have loaded? What font string is the xterm using? My xterm is using this font: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--10-100-75-75-c-60-iso8859-1 As you can see, it is an iso8859-1 font, which is why I can see the western-european characters. I would need to run in an xterm with a different font, to see Cyrillic characters. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Since we have PGP support...
1999-11-12-09:12:52 Rich Lafferty: I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere? By one of those totally whizzo coincidences, the same question drove me to solve this one for myself quite recently. I'm using mutt-1.0i on Linux, along with GnuPG 1.0. I have the following pgp-related variables in my .muttrc: set pgp_default_version=gpg set pgp_autosign set pgp_sign_as="CE34B136" unset pgp_strict_enc set pgp_timeout=3600 along with a few pgp-hooks for frequent correspondents. I tried jacking the pgp_timeout up higher, but couldn't make it work. I also tried diking it out entirely, but the most trivial patch I tried didn't work, the resulting mutt never asked for a passphrase in the first place:-(. So anyway, on to your question with keys, the following in my .gnupg/options seems to have done the trick: keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net Another one that may or may not improve the odds of gpg's swallowing more keys is allow-non-selfsigned-uid I have that, I don't know whether it's making my life any happier or not. Then I added encrypt-to 9BD503BF (that's my encrypting key id) so that I would be able to read my file copies of things I send encrypted. And if you want to increase your odds of things working some more, you might need to score some of the extensions for other crypto algorithms; they aren't widely advertised, but they're in a contrib directory on the gnupg ftp site, and they are easy to install. Of course, the reason they are left out of the gnupg distribution is because they are encumbered by patent, so depending on where you are and what you use gnupg for, in principle it might be a patent violation for you to use some of the extensions. -Bennett P.S. when I first looked at your note, mutt painted this up at the top: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Nov 12 16:07:37 1999) --] gpg: Signature made Fri 12 Nov 1999 09:12:50 AM EST using RSA key ID 2FA1A061 gpg: requesting key 2FA1A061 from wwwkeys.pgp.net ... gpg: key 2FA1A061: public key imported gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 (RSA: 1) gpg: Good signature from "Rich Lafferty [EMAIL PROTECTED]" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. gpg: Fingerprint: 30 FB 8F 6D 74 2E 99 18 B3 39 61 CB 0A 5E 7F 69 [-- End of PGP output --] PGP signature
mutt-1.0 and IRIX
Hi! I can't compile mutt-1.0 under IRIX64 6.2 03131016 IP19. There is no charsets.[alias|list] in the charsets-directory. It seems, the system doesn't have i81l oder nls installed. ./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-flock --enable-fcntl --disable-nls --enable-compressed Any hints? Shade and sweet water! Stephan PS: There is an error in charsets/Makefile: parse_i18n: parse_i18n.o $(LIBOBJS) $(CC) -o parse_i18n parse_i18n.o $(LIBOBJS) but it should be: parse_i18n: parse_i18n.o $(LIBOBJS) $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o parse_i18n parse_i18n.o $(LIBOBJS) -- | Stephan SeitzE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | WWW: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/| | PGP Public Keys: http://fsing.fs.uni-sb.de/~stse/pgp.html | PGP signature
Re: Alternates
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote: Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates? alternates dre@chronic\.net alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added to Mutt, a short survey of the then-current Mutt users showed that everyone thought it would be just fine to make a single regexp that matched all addresses. So there you have it, the democratic process at work. :) The democratic process also gave us Bill Clinton. :( Seriously though, would it be difficult to make it so that several alternates would become a big OR'd regexp? For example, having the alternates listed as they are above would be "put together" into "(dre@chronic\.net)|(snoop@lbc\.ca.us)" ? -- == Nathan Cullen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
Re: Automatic CC adding
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: I have some letters that comes to me with "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Every time i responding this message i need to add "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Now i do this by hands. Is there any way to do it automatically? Does using g(roup reply) work for you? It puts the To: address in the To: field of the reply, and the original sender as Cc:. not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To: address is one of my alternates... i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress where all replies should come with a From: with that address greetings, martin. -- vi has two modes the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- (alan cox) pike programmerOn The Verge| db.hb2.tuwien.ac.at (not yet in) San Diego | www.hb2.tuwien.ac.at unix systemadministrator iaeste.or.atiaeste.tuwien.ac.at www.archlab.tuwien.ac.at black.linux-m68k.org stuts.orgbahai.atmud.at Martin B"ahr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
Re: Automatic CC adding
Martin Baehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999: not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To: address is one of my alternates... i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress where all replies should come with a From: with that address How about remove it from alternates and use a send-hook to set the sender address? Admittedly you can't then use $reverse_name, unless you start using the developement version of Mutt which supports set from= (instead of needing to use my_hdr From, which is not compatible with $reverse_name). Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / I try to handle one day at a time, but lately several have attacked me at once!
Re: Automatic CC adding
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 04:26:39AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To: address is one of my alternates... i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress where all replies should come with a From: with that address How about remove it from alternates and use a send-hook to set the sender address? Admittedly you can't then use $reverse_name, unless you start using the developement version of Mutt which supports set from= (instead of needing to use my_hdr From, which is not compatible with $reverse_name). i tried that, but i was unsuccessfull resetting the my_hdr From for all other alternates. i also tried a send_hook to add a my_hdr Cc: also that didn't work :-( strangely enough, using my_hdr Xx: does work, and only gets added to the correct set of mails: #send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr From:' #send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr From: Martin Baehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]' #send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr Cc:' #send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook '.' 'unmy_hdr Xx:' send-hook '~f cc' 'my_hdr Xx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' greetings, martin. -- vi has two modes the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't -- (alan cox) pike programmerOn The Verge| db.hb2.tuwien.ac.at (not yet in) San Diego | www.hb2.tuwien.ac.at unix systemadministrator iaeste.or.atiaeste.tuwien.ac.at www.archlab.tuwien.ac.at black.linux-m68k.org stuts.orgbahai.atmud.at Martin B"ahr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
[Slightly OT] OSS Best Practices
Apologies to non-developers for a slightly off topic post. I am writing on Open Source Software Best Practices (e.g., peer review, source code management, ego-less programming, and defect tracking). The first draft is at muskrat.home.texas.net/oss_bp.html. I am looking for other examples. If you have any comments, stories, etc. please e-mail with them directly. Thank you, Jeffrey L. Taylor
