Re: Problem verifying gpg signatures with pgp
On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote: Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How come it can't do this already, is it because it hasn't yet invoked GPG/PGP to see the list of keys? The problem is that the _default_ signing key is something specific to the underlying PGP implementation. Frequently, Mutt doesn't even know the key ID of this key. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Re: Reading encrypted messages (not)
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:07:30AM +0100, rex wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:59:22PM +, Tom Friedetzky wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 12:35:35PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: [...] ... you add +encrypttoself to these commands. This does the trick nicely. Thanks a lot! Don't forget that _anyone_ who has access to the encrypted message can then see that you are one of the recipients. If you're sending anonymous mail, or do not want a link between yourself and the recipient, this is a BIG security hole. This is not a problem for me. I do not send anonymous mail. I just don't want someone to be able to read what I wrote (or what I received), sometimes. Thanks, Tom -- Tom Friedetzky email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Institut für Informatik phone: +49-89-289-28495 Technische Universität München fax:+49-89-289-25297 D-80290 München, Germanyroom: (SB2) S2239
Re: Recogonize the mime type automatically?
On Sun, Feb 06, 2000 at 06:50:22PM -0500, Yifang Dai wrote: Hi, here is a situation that bothers me a lot, I receive fax in an attachment as tif files. But mutt doesn't recognize it as image/tiff but instead as: [-- Attachment #2: aaaeoth9.tif --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Encoding: base64, Size: 22K --] [-- application/octet-stream is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] I know I can use 'v' and 's' to save it to disk first, and I also know I can change the attachment content type by '^E', but I want mutt to recognize the correct mime types automatically and then I can just type 'v' then 'enter' to launch viewfax. Is there anyway to accomplish this? This is not a problem with mutt but with the program used to send the mail. It is the responsibility of the sending MUA (mail user agent) to label the attachment with the proper Content-Type which the receiving MUA then uses to determine how to view the attachment. Some (e.g., Microsoft) MUAs use the file extension to determine how to view the file, but this is not the way that MIME is specified to work. That being said, if you can't convince the sender to fix his/her MUA configuration and you really want to handle these messages automatically, I would suggest using procmail to edit your incoming mail on the fly and "correct" the Content-Type field to match the file name extension. I have fixed other MIME-encoding errors this way, but not this particular error. -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation Unit | Spokane, Washington, USA
Re: printing from mutt
David DeSimone [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Your message starts with Reply-To: because you are always supposed to put a blank line between the message headers, and your text. Since you didn't, the empty Reply-To header is treated as part of your message. You should change your E-mail habits accordingly. :) I posted a patch that fixes this problem, but I don't think there was any reaction to it. The patch affected mutt_read_rfc822_header in parse.c. Edmund
folder hooks and sendmailendmail
Hi, I can't seem to get mutt to use different sendmail settings for different folders: folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" just makes mutt beep when switching to that folder... I thought that ANY configuration setting could be made from a folder hook? Thanks, Raymond -- Raymond A. Meijer True Bit BV
New mail notification
I am using procmail to automatically deliver part of my incoming mail in certain mailboxes. I want mutt to notify me when any of these mailboxes get new mail, so I have added mailbox my_mailbox to my .muttrc. Mutt does notify me when I run it (in the new=x, folders with new mail). The problem is that when I change to that folder and leave without having read all the new mail, mutt will tell me that I have no folders with new mail. I have set set nomark_old so that the unread mail appears as new when I enter the mailbox. It does not work either. I am using mbox-type mailboxes, and I know that the mutt detects if they have new mail comparing the modification time with the access time, so that the problem seems to be that the access time always changes, even when I have not finished reading all the mail. Does anyone have know how could I get mutt to do what I want? Should I change the mailbox format (MMDF, MH, Maildir) to do this? Thanks the
Re: Problem verifying gpg signatures with pgp
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:19:27AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2000-02-09 00:51:22 -0500, Jim Breton wrote: Question though: is there any possibility of getting Mutt to realize the correct mic alg for your default signing key? How come it can't do this already, is it because it hasn't yet invoked GPG/PGP to see the list of keys? The problem is that the _default_ signing key is something specific to the underlying PGP implementation. Frequently, Mutt doesn't even know the key ID of this key. I don't understand Thomas. Don't we say the PGP program we use? Or isn't the "set pgp_gpg" command needed? There's also "set pgp_default_version"... Isn't it possible to parse these variables and find out if it's PGP or GPG that's being used? I know you can get your key from PGP and use it with GPG (I've done that) but I think it's less common. And mutt would assume a default to the pgp_sign_micalg variable. Somebody who uses a PGP/GPG key with GPG/PGP will have to configure this variable to a new value... If I'm missing something, please tell me. -- Godoy. [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint 851B B620 626D 2AD0 E783 "Ser poeta não é minha ambição, E932 1330 BE6D A4A3 0625 é minha maneira de estar sozinho" - Fernando Pessoa. Publicações @ Conectiva S.A. Except where explicitly stated I speak on my own behalf. Exceto onde explicitado as declarações aqui feitas são apenas minhas.
Re: Problem verifying gpg signatures with pgp
On 2000-02-09 09:11:06 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote: If I'm missing something, please tell me. Think about the case of several private keys in your secret key ring. Which key the underlying version of PGP uses for signing may depend on settings in that program's configuration file, the order of keys in the key ring, and possibly the phase of the moon. There is no way for mutt to know which key the user is going to use for signing when none is given. Note that you can use the interactive sign-as function from the compose menu, and that it should set the micalg correctly. Also note that you can explicitly set the micalg and sign_as key variables in the configuration file. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
stop reading /etc/Muttrc
Hi, Is there anyway to stop mutt reading from /etc/Muttrc. I have my own .muttrc in the home directory, but it seems that mutt is still trying to read /etc/Muttrc. Shao. -- Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _ Department of Communications/ __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _ University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` | Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/ _
Re: GPG Key Selection Problems
Hello! On 2000-02-08 22:44:11 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: My pgp_list_pubring_command is "gpg --no-verbose --batch --with-colons --list-keys %r". Mutt seems to have trouble with the output, it first wants me to select a key instead of using the 'pub' entry. Is my format wrong or is this a bug/feature? It's a feature, I think. The key may contain different subkeys for different purposes (sign only, encrypt only or encrypt and sign). It could even be, that there are subkeys for (real) strong encryption (8192 bit) and for "weak" encryption (768 bit). Mutt lets you choose which key you actually want to use. Franz
Re: folder hooks and sendmailendmail
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:03:11AM +0100, Raymond A. Meijer wrote: I can't seem to get mutt to use different sendmail settings for different folders: folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" ---end quoted text--- I use folder-hook FOLDERNAME 'set sendmail="SENDMAILCOMMAND "' ^ ^ and it works fine ! HTH Frank
Build error with 1.1.2i
I am building mutt on Solaris 2.6 and get the following error right at the end of 'make install':- gcc -Wall -pedantic -g -O2 -o mutt addrbook.o alias.o attach.o base64.o browser.o buffy.o color.o commands.o complete.o compose.o copy.o curs_lib.o curs_main.o date.o edit.o enter.o flags.o init.o filter.o from.o getdomain.o handler.o hash.o hdrline.o headers.o help.o hook.o keymap.o main.o mbox.o menu.o mh.o mx.o pager.o parse.o pattern.o postpone.o query.o recvattach.o recvcmd.o rfc822.o rfc1524.o rfc2047.o rfc2231.o score.o send.o sendlib.o signal.o sort.o status.o system.o thread.o charset.o history.o lib.o muttlib.o editmsg.o resize.o dotlock.o pop.o -Limap -limap -lnsl -lsocket -lnsl -lsocket -lslang -lm make[2]: :: Command not found make[2]: *** [install-binPROGRAMS] Error 127 make[1]: *** [install-am] Error 1 make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 Mutt is actually built OK and works if I just copy it to its intended destination. I am using gcc version 2.95.1 and GNU make version 3.62. (Using Solaris make seems to work OK.) -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
Changing X-Sender header
I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both. Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows. Thank you, Kent -- Kent R. Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium Subject: Test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: RO Content-Length: 365 Lines: 14
Re: stop reading /etc/Muttrc
Referring to Shao Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Feb 09, 2000: | Is there anyway to stop mutt reading from /etc/Muttrc. | I have my own .muttrc in the home directory, but it seems that | mutt is still trying to read /etc/Muttrc. mutt -help Have A Nice Day, Wolfgang -- Wolfgang W. Baumann / CFD Consultant @ ZIB Berlin / mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] support: error located between ears of user ! hit any user to continue...
Re: Changing X-Sender header
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:26:28AM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote: I'm not sure if this relates to mutt or sendmail, I'm new to both. Would someone be kind enough to tell me how to change the X-Sender header? I have attached a copy of what it currently shows. Thank you, Kent -- Kent R. Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium Subject: Test Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status: RO Content-Length: 365 Lines: 14 This action is defined when mutt is compiled and resides in the mutt binary itself. If you want to remove it, you could find the appropriate lines in the source code that adds it and modify the code accordingly. Or you could just leave it in as a way to advertise and advocate the use of mutt. :-) That's primarily why I haven't taken it out. -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "Every successful person has had failures but repeated failure is no guarantee of eventual success." PGP signature
Re: folder hooks and sendmail
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000, 13:55, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: (sorry about that Subject header :) folder-hook "!" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]" I use folder-hook FOLDERNAME 'set sendmail="SENDMAILCOMMAND "' ^ ^ and it works fine ! ...and it works fine here as well!! Thanks a million! Raymond -- Raymond A. Meijer True Bit BV
RE: Changing X-Sender header
Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender". Kent -- Kent R. Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium
Sample Color Schemes?
Does anyone have some good looking color schemes? I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful... Thanks, A. (mutt.themes.org anyone?) -- Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (613) 223-5746
Re: Changing X-Sender header
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. Which MTA does it?
Re: Sample Color Schemes?
Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have some good looking color schemes? I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful... I've found the following works well for me in an SSH window under Windows -- it's not quite as nice in an xterm. Much of it was stolen from another .muttrc on the web, and then customized. ### ### color config ### # Do (TERM=xterm-color; export TERM) first... color hdrdefault red white color quoted blue white color signature red white color header blue white ^From: color header blue white ^Subject: #color indicator green blue color indicator cyan black color attachment magenta black color error red white color status green black color tree blue white color normal black white Charles -- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
Re: Sample Color Schemes?
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:20:42AM -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: Does anyone have some good looking color schemes? I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful... Depends on your definition of "good looking" doesn't it? I'd point you to mine URL:http://www.hagbard.demon.co.uk/muttrc/muttrc.html but the chances are it's one of those you think are "pretty awful". -- Take a look in Hagbard's World: | mutt.octet.filter - autoview octet-streams http://www.hagbard.demon.co.uk/ | mutt.vcard.filter - autoview simple vcards http://www.acemake.com/hagbard/ | muttrc2html - muttrc - HTML utility Free software, including| muttrc.sl - Jed muttrc mode
Re: Sample Color Schemes?
On 2000-02-09 11:20:42 -0500, Adam Sherman wrote: Does anyone have some good looking color schemes? I'm using the attached ones. colors.default is intended to be used with an xterm, colors.linux on the Linux console. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessler/ # -*-muttrc-*- color hdrdefault blue black color quoted blue black color signature red black color attachment red black color message brightred black color error brightred black color indicator black red color status brightgreen blue color tree white black color normal white black color markers red black color search white black color tilde brightmagenta black color index blue black ~F color index red black "~N|~O" # -*-muttrc-*- color hdrdefault blue white color quoted blue white color signature red white color attachment red white color message brightred white color error brightred white color indicator brightyellow red color status brightgreen blue color tree black white color normal black white color markers red white color search white black color tilde brightmagenta white color index blue white ~F color index red white "~N|~O"
Re: Changing X-Sender header
Kent R. Frazier writes: Sorry, I really ment the "Sender" header, not "X-Sender". The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail).
selective signatures
I often send mail to a number of recipients some (often lists) have their own send hook with a special signature, but what happens is that all the recipients then get this signature appended. Is it possible to have the sig apply only to the one recipient who triggered the hook? thanx -- Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 00 27 21 4265311
Re: Changing X-Sender header
Claus Assmann writes: On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. Which MTA does it? Mutt doesn't, either. What does this leave? Mailing list software?
Re: selective signatures
On Wed, Feb 09 2000, at 19:35 +0200, Eric Smith wrote: I often send mail to a number of recipients some (often lists) have their own send hook with a special signature, but what happens is that all the recipients then get this signature appended. Is it possible to have the sig apply only to the one recipient who triggered the hook? Does send-hook . 'set signature=""' as the first send-hook in your ".muttrc" what you want, i.e., reset the signature for recipients without special signature settings? Marco
Re: muttzilla
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for it but did not find anything. Where do i find it? Thx in advance. Holger -- + GnuPG || PGP key - finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] + +++ Debian GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] +++ ICQ: 2882018 +++
Re: muttzilla
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 07:19:34PM +0100, Holger Eitzenberger wrote: On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? Muttzilla? I just searched www.google.com and www.altavista.com for it but did not find anything. Where do i find it? Thx in advance. http://www3.bc.sympatico.ca/brian_winters/mutt/ - chris -- -- | Christopher Uy | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.chivalry.net | -- "5 out of 4 people don't understand fractions."
Re: Changing X-Sender header
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: Claus Assmann writes: On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. Which MTA does it? Mutt doesn't, either. What does this leave? Mailing list software? Could this possibly be added by my ISP's smtp server? -- Kent R. Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5EAC 06F2 6D79 F329 5C45 19AA EC0F 8F5A 9F2E 5558 GPG Key at: http://www.pobox.com/~kfrazier/public-keys.html Linux: The Operating System for the GNU Millennium
Re: New mail notification
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000: Does anyone have know how could I get mutt to do what I want? Should I change the mailbox format (MMDF, MH, Maildir) to do this? I use Maildir, and saving "old new" emails works fine, and Mutt reports new mail in these folders correctly. On the other hand, I'm running a Mutt with a patch to turn $mark_old into a quadoption which also does some other changes to this area of Mutt code, so maybe it won't work with standard Mutt. Regards, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / "The last good thing written in C was Franz Schubert's Symphony #9."
Re: selective signatures
Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000: Is it possible to have the sig apply only to the one recipient who triggered the hook? No, because this would in fact meaning two separate emails, since the message bodies would be different. Mutt can't send two different emails with a single "send mail" action. You need to do this yourself, create the body text first, and then send a separate email to the list and the other recipients. Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / "Her days are grey and her nights are black, different shades of mundane"
Re: muttzilla
Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? I use a similar program called altmail_mutt, which is basically a hack of the altmail_elm program that somebody posted here several months ago. In that system, the "xterm" command is hard-coded into the library, so if you want to change it, you must edit the code. Not too hard, if you're a programmer. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Changing X-Sender header
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:17:50PM -0600, Kent R. Frazier wrote: :On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 05:05:30PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: : Claus Assmann writes: : On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: : :The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). : : sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. : Which MTA does it? : : Mutt doesn't, either. What does this leave? Mailing list software? Yes. Many do so to help identify messages being sent by some daemon. :Could this possibly be added by my ISP's smtp server? Probably yes, as well as any other header. -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
save-hook
Hi, I subscribe to this mailing list. I receive mails from all those who send mail to this mailing list. My question here is that, what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt, the folder into which I save all these mails. Thanks, Jayan.
Re: New mail notification
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mutt does notify me when I run it (in the new=x, folders with new mail). The problem is that when I change to that folder and leave without having read all the new mail, mutt will tell me that I have no folders with new mail. I think this is a limitation of mbox folders. The only 'easy' way to determine if there is new mail, is to check the access time, and reading the folder causes that time to be changed. Mutt could try to actually read every folder you tell it, and look for messages with the proper Status, but that would be slow, and you probably wouldn't like it. Does anyone have know how could I get mutt to do what I want? Should I change the mailbox format (MMDF, MH, Maildir) to do this? If you use Maildir folders, Mutt will always be able to easily tell if there is new mail. If this is feasible for you, you should go ahead and switch to Maildir format. -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: Sample Color Schemes?
Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have some good looking color schemes? I do. ;) I tried a few that I found on the web, they were pretty awful... Well, try this: Colorization color indexwhite black ~F color header brightwhite black ^From: color header brightgreen black ^Subject: color body black green '^Good signature from user ".*"' color body black green '^gpg: Good signature from ".*"' color body black red '^Bad signature from user ".*"' color body black red '^gpg: BAD signature from ".*"' color body brightgreen black '[a-z0-9][-a-z_0-9/.%+]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+\.[-a-z]+' color body brightyellowblue '((https?|ftp)://|www\.)[-a-z_0-9@#$%+=:;'~,./?]+[a-z_0-9/]' Non-Colorization mono index bold~F mono headerbold^From: mono headerunderline ^Subject: mono body bold'^(Good|Bad) signature from user ".*"' mono body bold'[a-z0-9][-a-z_0-9/.%+]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+\.[-a-z]+' mono body underline '((https?|ftp)://|www\.)[-a-z_0-9@#$%+=:;'~,./?]+[a-z_0-9/]' -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: save-hook
A.V. Jayanthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000: what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt, the folder into which I save all these mails. Either: save-hook "~C mutt-users@" =mutt ...for this list specifically, or: save-hook ~l =%B To save every recognised list under their listname, eg for mutt-users it would be =mutt-users. Hope this helps, Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / Contentsofsignaturemaysettleduringshipping.
bug when `unset help'
When help is unset, the top line in the compose menu is blank, but in all other menu's, the top line is not blank -- it has what ever is appropriate for the menu(If the index menu, there's a message there, etc). Is this a bug? --paul
Re: muttzilla
It's rumored that around Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 09:18:24PM -0600 Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If anyone out there is using muttzilla, is their a way to have an email open in alternative Xterm, like Konsole, or rxvt? I use it with Eterm, you can alter his mzmail.(py|sh) script to use whatever you want. Make sure you change the args passed to the terminal as well. They're pretty vanilla scripts, just change things like "-title" to whatever your term understands. I substitued those included scripts with an altered version of the shell script i use to load up mutt with all my env variables to fit the muttzilla params. Works the same for using slrn instead of tin. -- .~. ~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~ /V\ KeyId 1024D/2AB39B99 // \\ 20B5 BE61 3E0D 81C2 E065 94FF 8856 90A2 2AB3 9B99 /( )\ Call me insane one more time and I'll eat your other eye! ^`~'^ '~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~' PGP signature
save without confirm
Hi, I'd like to know if there is a way to save email without confirming where to save it, in the case of a defined save-hook. I.e., I set up a save-hook, read an email which matches this save-hook, hit 's', and its automatically saved without asking me to confirm the save folder. Is this possible? Thanks, -- Brett Neely, Technology Editor, Web Site, Linuxcare, Inc. 415.354.4878 x269 tel, 415.701.7457 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
Re: save-hook
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:15:01AM +0530, A.V. Jayanthan wrote: : : I subscribe to this mailing list. I receive mails from all :those who send mail to this mailing list. My question here is that, :what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail :received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt, :the folder into which I save all these mails. Try this: save-hook '~e [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =mutt -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: save-hook
A.V. Jayanthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question here is that, what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt, the folder into which I save all these mails. save-hook '~C mutt-users' +mutt-users -- David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson UX WTEC Engineer |PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
Re: save without confirm
Brett Neely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 09 Feb 2000: I'd like to know if there is a way to save email without confirming where to save it, in the case of a defined save-hook. I.e., I set up a save-hook, read an email which matches this save-hook, hit 's', and its automatically saved without asking me to confirm the save folder. Is this possible? Sure. macro index s "save-messageenter" macro pager s "save-messageenter" From memory, so you may need to check the function name and such, but you get the idea... Regards Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / Money isn't everything. There's also roleplaying games.
Content-Type: message/partial ?
Hello all Mutt gurus, Just recently I got a message where the content had apparently been split into 5 separate parts (messages). The headers reveal: Mime-Version: 1.0 (split by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: message/partial; id="Thu_Feb_10_00:24:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; number=1; total=5 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Bryce Canyon" Similar for the other 4 messages, except the number in number= varied. Mutt only displayed this message: [-- message/partial is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] ... but I couldn't even view it with v, except by piping to less. Looking at the contents, it looks like it's actually a message/multipart (ie. an email with an attachment) that is split into 5 parts. Is there any way to display this message with(in) Mutt? And to reply? More details available on request... Oh yes, I'm using Mutt 1.1.2+patches. (Hmm, forgot to install 1.1.3...) Regards, Mikko (resorting to "vi" to create a single message, to get to the attachment, for now...) -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / User Error: please replace user and press any key to continue.
Mutt S/MIME
Would it be possible to use Mutt with S/MIME cryptography? Some of my clients are using this and it would be good of me to be able to handle their mail. Thanks, A. -- Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (613) 223-5746 PGP signature
Re: Changing X-Sender header
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Feb 09, 2000, Lars Hecking wrote: The Sender: header is written by the MTA (eg. sendmail). sendmail does not generate a "Sender:" header. Which MTA does it? exim does, sometimes.
Screen Redraw
After invoking GPG, mutt frequently screws up its screen. This is easily fixed with ^l, however, is there a way to get it to do this automagically? Thanks, A. -- Adam Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (613) 223-5746
mail does not reach certain hosts
Hi, I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its destination without me getting an error message. I use sendmail as MTA and it seems that sendmail is correctly configured. When I use netscape or kmail this does not happen though I also use sendmail as MTA then. The thing I can't understand why it's only some hosts that do not receive my mail, while with other it's on problem! I attach my muttrc in case someone can find a "bug" Thanks, Michael # # System configuration file for Mutt # # # $Id: Muttrc.in,v 2.0 1998/12/12 08:05:33 roessler Rel $ # # default list of header fields to weed when displaying # ignore "from " received content- mime-version status x-status message-id ignore sender references return-path lines # imitate the old search-body function macro index \eb '/~b ' 'search in message bodies' # simluate the old url menu macro index \cb |urlview\n 'call urlview to extract URLs out of a message' macro pager \cb |urlview\n 'call urlview to extract URLs out of a message' # Show documentation when pressing F1 macro generic f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt-1.0/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation" macro index f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt-1.0/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation" macro pager f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt-1.0/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation" # If Mutt is unable to determine your sites domain name correctly, you can # set the default here. # # set hostname=cs.hmc.edu # If your sendmail supports the -B8BITMIME flag, enable the following # # set use_8bitmime # Including other files source ~/.mutt/aliases set alias_file= ~/.mutt/aliases ## ## More settings ## set beep set charset="iso-8859-1" set folder="~/Mail" set mbox="~/Mail/inbox" set postpone=ask-yes set postponed="~/Mail/postponed" set realname="Michael Tatge" set record="~/Mail/outbox" set resolve set signature="~/.signature" set smart_wrap # color definitions color quoted brightdefault default color header brightdefault default ^Subject: color header brightdefault default ^From: # mailinglists ### Maybe here's a mistake, but I can't find one? ### If mail is not for localhost(deep-thought) set Form-header to me email-account #send-hooks send-hook '!(~t @deep-thought)' 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' # default folder-hook folder-hook . set sort=threads
Re: mail does not reach certain hosts
Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000: I have a major problem with Mutt 1.0i. Mail to some hosts does not reach its destination without me getting an error message. What is the error message? Mikko -- // Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/ // The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator / // Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs / The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.
Re: PGP error messages
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 05:10:38PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 102: pgp_v2: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 103: pgp_v2_language: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 104: pgp_v2_pubring: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 105: pgp_v2_secring: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 106: pgp_default_version: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 107: pgp_receive_version: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 108: pgp_send_version: unknown variable
Error in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc, line 109: pgp_key_version: unknown variable
source: errors in /home/jmnova3/.muttrc
Press any key to continue...
Now I *know* these variables work for other people, because I've looked
through the example .rc files linked from the mutt.org website. What am
I doing wrong?
Now I *know* these variables won't work for this version of mutt because
the pgp/gpg interface changed between 1.0 and 1.1 (or 0.95/0.96).
See doc/PGP-Notes.txt and contrib/{gpg,pgp2,pgp5}.rc, and the usual
funny manual.
Going through the archives, I found this mail, which mirrors exactly the
errors I'm getting. I'm running 1.0.1-us.
Funny thing is, all of these variables are referred to in the
doc/manual.txt file, except for the pgp_v2* variables. I can't even put
the pgp_default_version variable in my .muttrc without getting the unkown
variable editor.
THe other thing is that according to said doc/manual.txt, the only options
for pgp_default_version are pgp2, pgp5, and gpg. I just installed
6.5.2...am I going to be able to use that, or do I have to roll back to
5.x?
-Chris Woodfield
