Re: Gnupg Signing
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:29:19AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: As I understand it, in order for me to communicate with someone with pgp, send them encrypted data, I would need to sign with their public key and then they would decrypt it with their private key. No, you _encrypt_ with other's public keys, look after that word. Signing with public keys doesn't make sense. Gero
mutt can't find his help :-/
Hello, i have updated my mutt-0.9.6 to mutt-1.0pre2i. mutt-0.9.6 was an RPM, i deinstalled before. There are now some problems with the F1/ F2 to show help. I have set in my .muttrc the path to tjhe help! like this: ## Show TXT-documentation when pressing F1: macro generic f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" \ "Show Mutt documentation" macro index f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" \ "Show Mutt documentation" macro pager f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" \ "Show Mutt documentation" Same like html-help, but this I have longer. Have get the html-files and have tell mutt where the are. But can't change also this folder! What's going on? Cant understand :( Wanna be used /usr/local/doc/mutt/html/manual.html. No chance,..always mutt can't find :-/ But mutt dont find this :-/ Always he want to look in /usr/doc/packages. What an fould i do? Somebody can help me? But please i'm not an english-crack, write "light-english", don't know what it is...but see me ;-)) *g* Info: configure, i have used the default. -- Reg. Linux-user # 134173 E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: www.ndh.net/home/wohld/index.html
Re; Gnupg Signing
Taking on the advice of the earlier message I was replied to on, I encrypted a message to a friend of mine. From the message I sent I thought that I would use his key to encrypt it then he would decrypt it with his secret key. When I used the encrypt function from the pgp-menu, I assume it used my key to my friend, but I received this back from stdin [deklown@gateway /tmp]$ mutt gpg: using secondary key 2022484D instead of primary key B87477EB gpg: This key probably belongs to the owner gpg: reading from `/tmp/mutt-gateway-18249-20' gpg: writing to `-' gpg: ELG-E/CAST5 encrypted for: 2022484D Joshua Line [EMAIL PROTECTED] still confused some...This key probably...? reading from /tmp ? writing to what? is this /dev/null ? or is this writing to memory that is still there as I type this? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always beenin your possession." Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private!
Re: mutt can't find his help :-/
Hi! On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 01:58:47PM +0100, Clemens Wohld wrote: ## Show TXT-documentation when pressing F1: macro generic f1 "!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" \ "Show Mutt documentation" This looks ok. Always he want to look in /usr/doc/packages. Somebody can help me? But please i'm not an english-crack, write "light-english", don't know what it is...but see me ;-)) Maybe there are old configuration files left, Muttrc for example - except the deinstallation of the old mutt failed, then this could be call instead of the new one. (For safety again in German language: Vom alten Mutt sind wohl noch Konfigurationsdateien uebrig, z. B. das Muttrc - ausser die Deinstallation des alten hat nicht funktioniert, in diesem Fall koennte sogar das alte Programm statt des neuen aufgerufen werden. :) Gero
Re: mutt can't find his help :-/
Hello Clemens! On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Clemens Wohld wrote: i have updated my mutt-0.9.6 to mutt-1.0pre2i. mutt-0.9.6 was an RPM, i deinstalled before. Was the mutt-1.0pre2i which you used to update a source or a binary-package (*.i386.rpm)? There are now some problems with the F1/ F2 to show help. I have set in my .muttrc the path to tjhe help! like this: ...and there could you find the manual, isn't it? [...] Wanna be used /usr/local/doc/mutt/html/manual.html. No chance,..always mutt can't find :-/ But mutt dont find this :-/ Always he want to look in /usr/doc/packages. That's the default directory for documents in the S.u.S.E. RPM-database. If you will make your own *.i386.rpm Package from the source in a S.u.S.E. System it will use this default directory. What an fould i do? Maybe you can make a symbolic link to the directory. bye - Wilhelm -- Wilhelm Wienemann, Amselweg 10, D-47546 Kalkar/Germany == E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] === "And since you are the future keepers of everything, including music, we hope you will keep it well, with love, and in joy." (Frederick Fennell)
index_format
I have the following entries in my .muttrc
set date_format="%b %d %y"
set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d %y} %-17.17F (%4l) %s"
Only the month/day get displayed. Why is year (%y) not displayed?
I tried several options mentioned in the date_format flag and in the strftime function.
The index format does not change. I have even downloaded version 1.01 and installed it.
Thet's not solving the problem either.
Any ideas how to fix the index_format is much appreciated.
TIA.
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
= Time is relative. Here is a new way to look at time. =
http://www.smcinnovations.com
Re: index_format
Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 19 Mar 2000:
set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d %y} %-17.17F (%4l) %s"
Looks fine. Because you don't have a %d reference, $date_format doesn't
matter here at least.
Only the month/day get displayed. Why is year (%y) not displayed?
Beats me, it should be.
When you're viewing the message index, have you tried to check what the
actual value of your $index_format variable is? Perhaps it's something
else than you think it is, maybe set by a hook or something? You can
view it with
:set ?index_format
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs /
"Scotty, beam us aboard." "Aye, sir. Will a 2x4 do?"
Re: hooks and $folder
David -- ...and then David Ellement said... % On 000317, at 20:08:03, David T-G wrote: % %send-hook . 'set folder="~/Mail"' %send-hook 'long|but|definite|regexp' 'set folder="~/Mail/subdir"' % % Well, sort of. If I want to save some other email that doesn't belong in % ~/Mail/subdir *before* I've sent something else, $folder doesn't get % reset. % % Try: % % set folder="~/Mail" % % in addition to the send-hooks. Thanks for the idea, but I already have that -- and that would only work once per muttrc reading anyway. My problem is that $folder gets reset to .../APD (just like I requested) but that I have to do something to invoke a hook -- and that's either change a folder or send (start) some mail -- to find a way to un-reset it. I was thinking about a macro set (assuming first finding an available key, but let's just assume ^f) like ^fa for .../APD and ^fu for .../UGA and so on and ^f or ^fd for default. It would be easier if mutt had a real scripting language that would let me specify - do something - wait for input - do something else but that's a while off. Now that I think about it, though, maybe I can use %o in a save-hook, or even in an fcc-hook, and never reset $folder. Something like fcc-save-hook 'some}long}expression' =APD/%o fcc-save-hook 'other|expression' =UGA/%o might do the trick... In fact, I think I'll send this to the whole list for comment and since I can't play to implement it right now :-) % % -- % David Ellement Thanks again! :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0. Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh* PGP signature
Re: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!
Hi, folks -- Now that I can build because I have a working compiler (sorry for the noise :-) I would like to look into my favorite feature patches. I use patch-0.00.sec.patchlist.7 patch-0.95.4.sec.expand_hook.1 patch-0.95.4.sec.reverse_reply.1 patch-0.95.sec.condense_pgp.1 patch-0.94.13.bj.current_shortcut.1 patch-0.95.3.bj.ed_mtime.1 patch-0.95.3i.bj.keyattach.1 patch-0.95.4.bj.status-time.1 patch-0.95.bj.hash_destroy.2 patch-0.95.bj.noquote_hdr_term.1 patch-0.95.3.hb.save_alias.1 patch-1.0.rr.compressed.2 patch-mail-1.0-y2k-tlr in my favorite cocktail. I should think that the y2k patch is now in the distro, and hope that current_shortcut is, and wonder if compressed folders will ever be included (my own pontifications to the contrary aside). Can the authors or maintainers of the patches let me know if any of them are obsoleted or need to be updated, and where to get them? TIA :-) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! The "new millennium" starts at the beginning of 2001. There was no year 0. Note: If bigfoot.com gives you fits, try sector13.org in its place. *sigh* PGP signature
Re: index_format
On 0, Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 19 Mar 2000:
set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d %y} %-17.17F (%4l) %s"
Looks fine. Because you don't have a %d reference, $date_format doesn't
matter here at least.
Only the month/day get displayed. Why is year (%y) not displayed?
Beats me, it should be.
When you're viewing the message index, have you tried to check what the
actual value of your $index_format variable is? Perhaps it's something
else than you think it is, maybe set by a hook or something? You can
view it with
:set ?index_format
Thanks for replying.
This is for another account on my system. The index_format strings are pretty much
the same. In .muttrc, it has
set index_format="%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s"
When I do, :set ?index_format, I get the following:
--- 77/78: Mikko Hänninen Re: index_format
-- (all)
index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15n (%4l) %s"
The following are the only hooks in my .muttrc:
folder-hook . set sort=threads
folder-hook =sent set sort="date-sent"
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
= Time is relative. Here is a new way to look at time. =
http://www.smcinnovations.com
Re: index_format
Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 19 Mar 2000:
This is for another account on my system. The index_format strings are pretty much
the same. In .muttrc, it has
set index_format="%4C %Z %[!%y%m%d] %-17.17F (%3l) %s"
When I do, :set ?index_format, I get the following:
index_format="%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15n (%4l) %s"
If you compare the two strings, you will note that the timestamp format
in the above is "%{%b %d}" -- so something must be changing that, after
that first statement in your .muttrc has been loaded. So you need to
find what/where that something is, and fix that...
If you can't find it on your own, perhaps you can post your .muttrc
here, although I do recommend first looking yourself. :-)
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.freak // DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy scifi, the Corrs /
Microsoft Windows... a virus with mouse support.
two mutt 1.1.9 problems(?) (was: [Announce] mutt-1.1.9 is out - RELEASE CANDIDATE!)
Hi *!
I have a slight problem with Muttrc in the 1.1.9. In 1.0.1 and before, the
Muttrc that got installed was automatically changed during install to
contain the correct path to "manual.txt" according to --prefix. This no
longer works for 1.1.9. Even after configuring with --prefix, the installed
Muttrc still contains "/usr/local/." as path to manual.txt
NEWS states that the mechanism to generate Muttrc has been changed, so maybe
this was an oversight? Or did I miss something?
Also, as far as I can gather, the charsets are no longer part of the
tarball but are distributed separately ("charmaps-0.0"). Is this a
development version specific thing or will this be a permanent change? I'm
asking because we'd have to take this into account when providing the new
RPMs for 1.2 when it comes out (we're currently running tests on 1.1.9).
I couldn't find anything in NEWS or ChangeLog and a brief skim of my own
mutt-devel archives came up empty, so I decided to ask...
Thanks in advance,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Ribbrockhttp://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytanICQ#: 15839919
"You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"
