Re: URL view not working

2000-10-30 Thread Jürgen Salk

 I have just switched distros to SuSE and moved over my muttrc, and
 many others.  Now, when I hit ^B to get a urlview (which I have
 macro-ed in my muttrc), I get a urlview command not found.  Is this a
 separate program, or part of Mutt?  

In earlier SuSE versions (6.4, IIRC) urlview was part of the 
mutt rpm package. Newer versions (=6.4) have split this into 
a separate urlview package. You'll probably find both of them
in series n.

Best regards - Juergen.  

-- 
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net




templates macros

2000-10-30 Thread Mark Weinem

Hi! 

Some weeks ago, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
[Fri, 10 Mar 200, Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]]

 1) create the templates you want, using your editor of choice
 2) create macros that change the value of 'editor' to call a script/etc.
 that processes the reply+template and calls your editor, then set 'editor'
 back to the default, eg:

 macro index r :set editor=replyscriptenterreply:set editor=defaultenter

 With forms of this method the "template" isn't even limited to a text-based
 construct, it can really be anything at all.


Could someone please give an example of such a replyscript? I want to
reply with a preformulated standard mail (standard.txt).

The editor I use is gnuclient.

Greetings,
Mark Weinem



Re: Mutt 1.0.1i

2000-10-30 Thread Martin Schweizer

On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:55:31PM -0500 David T-G wrote:

 % I test diffrent settings in .muttrc but when I start mutt I always reveive the
 %  following error: "/home/info/Mail is not a mailbox".
 
 You probably have an entry like 
 
   mailboxes /home/info/Mail
 
 in your muttrc file.  
No, there is no 'mailboxes /home/info/Mail' in my .muttrc.

 Did you mean to set $folder instead?
I set 'set folder=~/Mail'

 
 
 % What is going wrong?
 
 My guess is that it isn't a mailbox :-)  Is that your mail directory,
 with mailboxes therein?  What does file(1) tell you about it?  
file:
mbox = mail text
sent = english text (??)

I attached you my .muttrc .

Thanks.

-- 
Regards

Martin Schweizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





#  Telsa's over-long .muttrc.  #
#  #
# This all started when I wanted to switch colours off when#
# reading email. I read the documentation, and got completely  #
# sidetracked with all the _other_ things I could do instead!  #
#  #
# Mutt has a set of internal defaults for each variable,   #
# option, and thing you can tinker with. When you start it up, #
# it will first apply all of those. Then it will look for a#
# file on the computer called "Muttrc", which has a set of #
# default settings for everyone on the system. This usually#
# lives in /etc/Muttrc. It applies those settings. #
#  #
# And _then_ it looks in the home directory of the user in #
# question for a file called ".muttrc". If this exists, it #
# applies the settings in that, too.   #
#  #
# So the place to put your personal ones is in that .muttrc in #
# your home directory, because it's the last one that mutt #
# checks, so those defaults will stick.#
#  #
# Your personal .muttrc does not need to mention every #
# setting. (Mine certainly doesn't.) It only needs to mention  #
# the ones which are different from the default Muttrc. This   #
# makes starting out very easy. If there is one single thing   #
# you don't like in the main one, just set that one single #
# thing in your .muttrc and forget about all the others. :)#
#  #
# However, if you're going to make a lot of changes, then a#
# useful thing to do is to copy the Muttrc and call the copy   #
# '.muttrc' and put it in your home directory. That way, you   #
# can just tweak that one easily. That's what I did, anyway,   #
# and it worked for me.#
#  #
# -Don't- edit the default Muttrc unless you know what you're  #
# doing. Stick to playing with your own personal one until #
# you have something you know works. If the personal one goes  #
# wrong, you can just delete it, and then mutt will use the#
# settings in the Muttrc and all is well.  #
#  #
# Thanks to: the mutt manual writers, the mutt-users mailing   #
# list, Tom Gilbert, Georg Griev, Dick Porter, Fairlight and   #
# Mikko Hänninen for patience under much questioning, (from#
# everything from 'is a mailbox the same as a folder?' to 'why #
# is this pattern not being evaluated?'). Thanks also to the   #
# rpm specfile writer who carefully included exactly how to#
# make PGP work with mutt even if you had the US version. And  #
# thanks to the people who put their muttrcs on the web. You   #
# may recognise a lot of this one...   # 
#  #
# Feel free to peruse, borrow and alter this for your own use. #
# If it breaks something, I won't be too surprised; if it  #
# works, I'll be delighted.#
#  #
# Comments and criticisms and corrections and spellchecks are  #
# all welcome (spam is not, however): send 'em to  #
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]#
#   -- Telsa   #



# A basic convention for almost any ordinary file in your  #
# home directory whose name begins with a dot and ends with#
# 'rc' is that anything with a # mark at the start of the line #
# is a comment and to be ignored. If you look at files that#
# fit those criteria, the only exception you're likely to 

The S macro for in-line PGP...

2000-10-30 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset

The "S" macro which I found in the documentation/FAQ isn't working for me
(in Mutt v1.2.5). Here's what I have:

macro compose S "Fpgp +verbose=0 -fast +clearsig=on\ny^T^Uapplication/pgp;
format=text; x-action=sign\ny"

The ^T^U etc. never gets executed. It justs runs the PGP command and
comes back. I have to do the ^T^U manually and then send the message.

Any ideas on what could be blocking it?

Thanks,
js.
-- 
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, Sr. UNIX Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Homepage http://www.jsmoriss.dyndns.org/ 
UNIX, Internet, Homebrewing, Cigars, PCS, CP2020 and other Fun Stuff...
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night you can hear Windows NT reboot!



Volkov (mutt + news) + slrnpull?

2000-10-30 Thread Nollaig MacKenzie



Greetings,

Is it possible to use Gospodin Volkov's vvvnntp
patch with a setup like that one would get using
slrn and slrnpull? That is, can mutt+vvvnntp be
configured to look for alt.fan.undset articles in
/var/spool/slrnpull/news/alt/fan/undset ?

Cheers, N.

-- 
Nollaig MacKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amhuinnsuidhe.cx
Oppose renaming Mt Logan!! http://www.savemtlogan.com



Re: colouring incomming mail

2000-10-30 Thread Michael Tatge

Johan Huis muttered:
 Does anybody know how I can give mail originating from a certain user
 a different colour in my index ?

color index foreground background '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]'

HTH,

Michael
-- 
The use of anthropomorphic terminology when dealing with computing systems
is a symptom of professional immaturity.
-- Edsger Dijkstra

PGP-Key: http://www.stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key



Address rewriting

2000-10-30 Thread lars . johansson

Hello!

I have a slight problem with address rewriting.
If you look at the two attached messages you will se that the address in the
version that is actually received is FUBAR (the other is from the "sent-mail"
folder).
Someone suggested that tis was an error in the mail systems address rewriting
function, but my BOFH denies that.
Is there a way to fix this?

Regards, Lars

-- 
Lars M. Johansson   +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"


Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:41 +0100
From: Lars M Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adresstest
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 192
Lines: 8

?

-- 
Lars M. Johansson   +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"



From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Oct 18 15:44:08 2000
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from romeo.ic.ac.uk (romeo.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.9])
by kobra.efd.lth.se (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9IDi7L23587
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:44:07 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mandy.ee.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.114.13])
by romeo.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
id 13ltVO-0003MF-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:42 +0100
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:43:41 +0100
From: "Lars M Johansson Lars M Johansson"[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adresstest
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Status: RO
Content-Length: 192
Lines: 8

?

-- 
Lars M. Johansson   +44 (0)7880 633134
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
-- it makes sense when you don't think about it"




Re: Address rewriting

2000-10-30 Thread Thomas Roessler

I'd suppose that whatever program you use to inject your message via
smtp is at fault here.

On 2000-10-30 13:30:25 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:30:25 +
 Subject: Address rewriting
 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
 
 Hello!
 
 I have a slight problem with address rewriting.
 If you look at the two attached messages you will se that the address in the
 version that is actually received is FUBAR (the other is from the "sent-mail"
 folder).
 Someone suggested that tis was an error in the mail systems address rewriting
 function, but my BOFH denies that.
 Is there a way to fix this?
 
 Regards, Lars
 
 -- 
 Lars M. Johansson +44 (0)7880 633134
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 "Every nonzero finite dimensional product space has an orthonormal base
 -- it makes sense when you don't think about it"


-- 
Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Using type 1 remailers and mutt.

2000-10-30 Thread Wouter Verheijen

I tried it too, without success.
It is all too hard to set up and manage. I downloaded a recent
mixmaster-list-file but only 3 hosts were active (the others had a
reliability of 0.00%).
Apperantly hardly anyone cares about the lack of Documentation,
support and usability of mixmaster.


-- 
Wouter Verheijen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: MAILDIR, MBOX

2000-10-30 Thread Ashton

Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 So this is my current .qmail file:
 
 #./Maildir/
 |/usr/bin/procmail
 
 So what would I add here?

|preline cat mbox

 I am confused. I thought you can only have one command in there. 

all sorts of silly things work in .qmail ...

man dot-qmail

However, procmail would be more to my tooth ...

:0 c
mbox




Mutt 1.0.1i...again

2000-10-30 Thread Martin Schweizer

Hello again

It test several things (also re-compiling) but no success! I receive always:
"/home/info/Mail is not a mailbox.". What does it mean?
Thanks in advance.

-- 
Regards

Martin Schweizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


PC-Service M. Schweizer
Gewerbehaus Schwarz
CH-8608 Bubikon
Tel. +41 55 243 30 00
Fax: +41 55 243 33 22
http://www.pc-service.ch



Re: MAILDIR, MBOX

2000-10-30 Thread Jason Helfman

I went back to version 1.2.5i and I get the same error:

/home/jhelfman/Mail/backup-inbox is not a mailbox.

On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 05:11:31PM -0700, Ben Reser muttered:
| On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 03:13:47PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
|  When I open mutt to the file, or through change directory inside of
|  mutt, this is what I get.
|  
|  /home/jhelfman/Mail/backup-inbox is not a mailbox.
| 
| Well from your headers you're running 1.3.9 which is a development version.  So
| these issues really should be handled on the development list.  Possibly a bug
| in the development version of mutt you are running.
| 
| You might want to try the released version 1.2.5i
| 
| -- 
| Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://ben.reser.org
| 
| Maslow's Maxim:  If the only tool you have is a hammer,
| you treat everything like a nail.
| 

-- 
/Jason G Helfman

"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."

Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96  2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org  Get Private!  1024D/35A1C149



Re: Using type 1 remailers and mutt.

2000-10-30 Thread rex

On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:17:10PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote:
 I tried it too, without success.
 It is all too hard to set up and manage. I downloaded a recent
 mixmaster-list-file but only 3 hosts were active (the others had a
 reliability of 0.00%).

There are quite a few active remailers. From www.plubius.net

Last update: Mon 30 Oct 100 14:42:33 PST
mixmaster   history  latency  uptime

shinn  ++** 8:20 100.00%
squirrel   --+-  2:12:51  99.99%
swiss  ++*++*++19:43  99.99%
noisebox   **-*+++-28:28  99.99%
dizum  ***+ 8:09  99.98%
riot   +++-++-   2:16:04  99.98%
cracow ***..-**  3:57:35  99.97%
austria+ **++*+ 9:03  99.93%
rot13  --++.--   3:24:10  99.89%
xganon ### *-+-__.# 10:27:05  99.82%

[ more high-uptime mixmaster remailers snipped]


Last update: Mon 30 Oct 100 14:42:33 PST
remailer  email addresshistory  latency  uptime
---
squirrel [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ---+  2:05:45 100.00%
shinn[EMAIL PROTECTED] ++*+ 8:59 100.00%
redneck  [EMAIL PROTECTED] **+#**#+###*  :46  99.99%
austria  [EMAIL PROTECTED]*+** 9:36  99.99%
dizum[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ***+ 8:20  99.99%
gretchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] --*-+**-++**  1:56:10  99.98%
nym  [EMAIL PROTECTED] **#**##++##+ 1:57  99.98%
xganon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *-*-__.# 10:26:32  99.94%
cracow   [EMAIL PROTECTED]++*..-**  3:36:20  99.94%
farout   [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---   8:32:01  99.84%
arick[EMAIL PROTECTED] +--+ --+  1:54:32  99.51%
noisebox [EMAIL PROTECTED]   +*- **+ 27:49  99.47%

[...]

I agree mixmaster lacks adequate documentation. It installed  under
RH6.2 a few months ago, but I cannot get it to compile under SuSE 6.4.

[...]
Found source directory openssl-0.9.3a.
Warning: Can't find SSLeay/OpenSSL version number!
Continue anyway? [y] 
Looking for libncurses.a...
Found at /usr/lib/libncurses.so.
Generating Makefile.
Please enter a pass phrase for your remailer (must be the same
whenever you re-compile Mixmaster).  
...
Compiling. Please wait.
gmake: *** No rule to make target `mix.o', needed by `mix'.  Stop.
Error: The compilation failed. Please consult the documentation (section
`Installation problems').  

The documentation was no help.

There is a mixmaster list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]  but it seems spam is more 
common than replies to questions.

-rex




Re: MAILDIR, MBOX

2000-10-30 Thread Jason Helfman

It's already being shoved into an mbox file!

On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:56:14PM -0600, Ashton muttered:
| Jason Helfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| 
|  So this is my current .qmail file:
|  
|  #./Maildir/
|  |/usr/bin/procmail
|  
|  So what would I add here?
| 
| |preline cat mbox
| 
|  I am confused. I thought you can only have one command in there. 
| 
| all sorts of silly things work in .qmail ...
| 
| man dot-qmail
| 
| However, procmail would be more to my tooth ...
| 
| :0 c
| mbox
| 

-- 
/Jason G Helfman

"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."

Fingerprint: 6A32 3774 E390 33B5 8C96  2AA1 2BF4 BD71 35A1 C149
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org  Get Private!  1024D/35A1C149



Re: Using type 1 remailers and mutt.

2000-10-30 Thread Brian Salter-Duke

On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:17:10PM +0100, Wouter Verheijen wrote:
 I tried it too, without success.
 It is all too hard to set up and manage. I downloaded a recent
 mixmaster-list-file but only 3 hosts were active (the others had a
 reliability of 0.00%).

This is not correct. The recent lists of reliable remailers show many
more than this. Lists are posted every day on alt.privacy.anon-server.

 Apperantly hardly anyone cares about the lack of Documentation,
 support and usability of mixmaster.

Unfortunately this does appear to be the case. The l-mix list is pretty
dead. The newsgroup alt.privacy.anon-server is half total junk and I
mean total, and half about remailers. I see nothing about mixmaster.

David T-G asked about various sources. This URL has lots of info and
good links:-

http://anon.xg.nu/remailer-page.html#top

The newsgroup alt.privacy.anon-server is the best of several that look
as if they might have something about mixmaster, and remailers. It has
a good FAQ posted every Wednesday. I think it is archived at:-

http://www.almostnotcrazy.org/b/apasfaq/apas-faq.html

I am concentrating on type 1 remailers at present. I amy look again at
mixmaster later.

Cheers, Brian.

 
 -- 
 Wouter Verheijen
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Chemistry, School of BECS, SITE, NT University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia.
Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847. http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/
Get PGP2 Key:- http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/chemistry/duke.key.html



Re: Using type 1 remailers and mutt.

2000-10-30 Thread rex

On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:33:50PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
 
 http://anon.xg.nu/remailer-page.html#top
 
 The newsgroup alt.privacy.anon-server is the best of several that look
 as if they might have something about mixmaster, and remailers. It has
 a good FAQ posted every Wednesday. I think it is archived at:-
 
 http://www.almostnotcrazy.org/b/apasfaq/apas-faq.html

Thanks.


 I am concentrating on type 1 remailers at present. I amy look again at
 mixmaster later.

Have you looked at premail? Last version I know of was 0.46, available at
http://www.radiusnet.net/crypto/archive/remailer/premail/

Premail facilitates using chained remailers: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ((chain=3)) 

It also largely automates nym creation.

Unfortunately, it uses old style comment addressing for commands, and Mutt is
paternalistic about addresses and automatically rewrites (mungs, in this
application) the addresses that need to be passed to premail. Mutt has a
compile switch to turn off the automatic address rewriting, but there is a
warning in the docs that it is broken and should not be used. I wish I were
capable of fixing it.

Nyms and remailers are *so* much easier to use under DOS  Windoze (Potato,
Jack B Nymble), it's an embarassment to the *nix community. IMO.

-rex

-- 
The King has note of all that they intend,
By interception which they dream not of.
--William Shakespeare, _Henry V_, Act II, Scene 2