Is this list active
Dear all... Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or not? Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message. Regards, John
Re: Is this list active
John Indra proclaimed on mutt-users that: Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or not? Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message. maybe you just have a full mailbox? -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI Marriages are made in heaven and consummated on earth. -- John Lyly
Re: Is this list active
Hi, Like the subject line says, I'm wondering whether this list is active or not? We're discussing even things we shouldn't. Since my subscription, I haven't receive a single message. Did you receive your own? Thorsten
Re: Is this list active
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: |We're discussing even things we shouldn't. :) |Did you receive your own? Yes... then this list is alive for all this time. My mistake then, sorry... |Thorsten Regards, John
keeping folder/mailbox status state upon exit
Hi, Apologies upfront if this is well-known, but I searched mutt.org's FAQ and manual, google's linux area , deja, etc. and came up completely empty. I'd very much like to be able to set a message's status to 'deleted', but: without synchronizing my mailbox/folder so as to actually expunge the message, I'd like to be able to either quit mutt or just change folders, and have these messages' status be kept. I'm sure that others have similarly wanted to use some method like this especially when tracking a high-volume mailing list, where I wouldn't want to prematurely expunge messages I've deleted, or else future replies on the list wouldn't obviously be threaded under the ones I've read. I could imagine using the OLD versus NEW flags to accomplish something similar, but I'd prefer to be unanbiguous in my mind and use the DELETE flag instead. Thanks so much for the suggestions (just a pointer to the right document would also be appreciated). Take care, Daniel PS. Please cc me on replies as I don't subscribe. Thanks so much. -- Daniel A. Freedman Laboratory for Atomic and Solid State Physics Department of Physics Cornell University
Re: Question regarding clearsigning emails automatically
On Thursday, December 14, 2000 (CS:4.50.349) 18:44:14 [PM] (+) Bruno Postle [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... I'm very inconsistent with signing mail (especially if I know it's going to end up being viewed in Outlook) - but really all I'm doing is OK. In Outlook the signature is shown as an atachement. But i dont know that many lusers using M$. (But thats just happy me) encouraging people to think that _sometimes_ I don't sign my mail. What this means is that next time somebody forges my identity, nobody will think it's a forgery (they will just think I forgot to sign again). Right. Call me paranoid, but i tell everyone im signing ALL my messages. If they get a message that looks like its coming from me and isnt signed, they know this message in not from me! Really, you should be signing everything or nothing. Signing only makes sense when the public key is available on the keyservers. This is a hint to everyone who posts on this list - i know there are a few who *forgot* to upload it...BG BFN mh -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - If you are reading this and its not signed - ITS NOT FROM ME! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PGP signature
qmail, procmail and maildir
hi all, I´m using qmail as my MTA and procmail for filtering my mails. I compiled procmail like this: marco@voyager:~ procmail -v [..snip..] Locking strategies: dotlocking, fcntl(), lockf(), flock() Default rcfile: $HOME/.procmailrc Your system mailbox:/home/marco/Maildir/ [..snip..] my .procmailrc includes the following: [..snip..] MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail.log ...some rules [..snip..] my qmailrc: exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start '|preline procmail' splogger qmail the spool directory is a link to my Maildir: lrwxrwxrwx 1 marcousers20 Nov 27 20:44 marco - /home/marco/Maildir/ I used mbox before I changed to maildir and now procmails does nothing. the procmail.log wasn´t created by procmail too. there are no error messages. what the hell is going on here ? :) thx for help, Marco PS: mutt handles the maildir´s very fine :) -- Marco Ahrendt phone : +49-341-98-474-0 adconsys AGfax : +49-341-98-474-59 Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 19email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04107 Leipzig/Germany gnupg key at www.aktex.net/marco_work.asc
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 01:54:46PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote: hi all, I?m using qmail as my MTA and procmail for filtering my mails. I compiled procmail like this: marco@voyager:~ procmail -v [..snip..] Locking strategies: dotlocking, fcntl(), lockf(), flock() Default rcfile: $HOME/.procmailrc Your system mailbox:/home/marco/Maildir/ [..snip..] my .procmailrc includes the following: [..snip..] MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail.log ...some rules [..snip..] my qmailrc: exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start '|preline procmail' splogger qmail the spool directory is a link to my Maildir: lrwxrwxrwx 1 marcousers20 Nov 27 20:44 marco - /home/marco/Maildir/ I used mbox before I changed to maildir and now procmails does nothing. the procmail.log wasn?t created by procmail too. there are no error messages. what the hell is going on here ? :) You have got at least version 3.15 of procmail have you? -- Chris Green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.isbd.co.uk/
Re: gnupg vs pgp? Really getting OT
* Jesper Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [14/12/00, 22:10:31]: This 'Leitkultur' discussion you Germans are having these days does send chills down the spines of your fellow European neighbours. Not only the neighbours' spines, I can assure you. I don't know how much of this extraordinarily stupid discussions are in news elsewhere, though. But it's _not_ we Germans. And actually, it's not a recent discussion. It's only a new guy in politics who tries to profile himself. A poor way of doing it, for sure. Kai -- Kai Blin Webmasterof http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/uni/thm/molgen/ Univ. of Tuebingen Inst. of Human Genetics fon +49-7071-2974890 Wilhelmstrasse 27 Dept. of Molecular Genetics fax +49-7071-295233 D-72074 Tuebingen Do molecular biologists wear designer genes?
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
yes, procmail v3.15 2000/08/25 ! with procmail v3.13 + mbox everything worked fine. Marco On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:50:39PM +, Chris Green wrote: I?m using qmail as my MTA and procmail for filtering my mails. I used mbox before I changed to maildir and now procmails does nothing. the procmail.log wasn?t created by procmail too. there are no error messages. what the hell is going on here ? :) You have got at least version 3.15 of procmail have you? -- Marco Ahrendt phone : +49-341-98-474-0 adconsys AGfax : +49-341-98-474-59 Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 19email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04107 Leipzig/Germany gnupg key at www.aktex.net/marco_work.asc
Outlook (again)
On Fri 15-Dec-2000 at 12:47:44PM +0100, Martin wrote: OK. In Outlook the signature is shown as an atachement. It's worse than that, if you use 'multipart/signed' the message body appears as an attachment (apparently - I've never actually seen this). Something I have found out recently is that 'multipart/mixed' messages _are_ displayed inline by outlook, even when they are pgp/mime signed as well. For instance, this: macro compose y 'attach-file/dev/nullentersend-message' will force 'multipart/mixed' outgoing mail. YMMV, I'm not recommending that anyone actually uses this, I don't have an 'outlook test suite' to check it. At the very least you will get lots of mail saying "what's this 'null' file? I can't seem to open it. It must be a virus." etc.. Bruno -- http://bruno.postle.net/
Re: Is this list active
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:12:54PM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: Hi, On 00-12-15, Jonathan Gift wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:04:34AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote: Nope, no one here. Sorry, joke. You were asking if anyone was in the list. Answering no was my attempt at humor since by definition the no was an indication there was life in the group. No offense meant. Jonathan -- "Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"
Re: gnupg vs pgp? Really getting OT
* On Friday, December 15, Kai Blin wrote: But it's _not_ we Germans. And actually, it's not a recent discussion. It's only a new guy in politics who tries to profile himself. A poor way of doing it, for sure. I get your point. Sorry. It was not my intention to insult all Germans. Over and out. Jesper -- "But how can one be warm alone?" Jesper Holmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
index_format: ANSI colors
Hello fellow mutt users. I want to colorize my index a bit more. How do I do this? Tried with some ansi sequences.. did not work, why? I think it would be great to be able to do this. And one more thing.. mutt really needs a simple, yet powerful to/from/cc/?? procmailrc frontend. Nice for all of us I think. Could work allmost like the a(lias) command. -- - Bjornar
Re: Trying to wrap my messages at 72 characters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:29:47PM -0600, David Champion wrote: On 2000.12.14, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Bryan Walton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vi understands the wl. However, when I begin to compose a message in mutt, the addition of this "wrap command" has the effect of positioning my cursor at the bottom of my signature, and not at the top of the screen. Is there something I can tell Mutt to make my cursor begin at the very top of the message that I am composing? Create or modify the file ".exrc" in your home directory. Add a line reading: set wl=72 (The leading tab is just for distinction here; don't put it in the file.) Thank you to everyone who offered ideas. David, thanks a bunch. Your idea of the .exrc file fixed my problem. I created that file and then removed the line from my .muttrc Thanks, Bryan Walton -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjo6NQIACgkQ+bU2CMlTTuoqxACcCj0tl4wU3DEsigr5Zk56uTKp 5+oAn1AdQqhVTFM5hFG0iJ/HAyyG7Ovb =HJE2 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: compressed mailbox mutt
Thanks everybody for all the help. I had in fact made blunder of using tar. gzip works fine. No problem. Excellent feature of mutt. Warm Regards Rajesh Michael Tatge saw fit to inform me that: Rajesh Fowkar muttered: I have downloaded the new mutt 1.2.5i rpm with compressed folder option enabled. I have created a gzip file oldlih.gz ( tar -zcvf oldlih nov2000 ) ^^^ ^^ The result is a tared and gziped file named 'oldlih'. Here nov2000 is the archieve of the mailing list mailbox of nov. The new /etc/Muttrc has got the following additional hooks for compressed folders : # gzip open-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -cd %f %t" close-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t %f" append-hook \\.gz$ "gzip -c %t %f" First of all these hooks only work with files named *.gz. They won't be executed on your 'oldlih' file! I don't use the compressed foler patch, does it work with tared files? If not, mutt won't be able to read the result that open-hook produces. Remember it's a tar file now, since gzip uncompressed it. But when I try to access this oldlih.gz I am getting the message for a split second decompressing oldlih.gz and than the mutt bar displays the message no mailbox. What's wrong ? Ah, the patch cannot handle tar files, so don't use tar! For a single mbox file it's useless anyway. For testing I would suggest to not modify the original file: gzip -c nov2000 oldlih.gz; mutt -f oldlih.gz -- Rajesh Fowkar /\ * How I Configured my SiS6215 Card ? Visit My Web Site * WebSite:http://rajesh.computers.webjump.com * Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Address:KURTARKAR NAGARI,BLDG-C,T4,3RD FLOOR,SHANTINAGAR,PONDA-GOA.(INDIA) * * Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future,concentrate the mind * on the present moment. - Buddha \/
Re: keeping folder/mailbox status state upon exit
Daniel -- ...and then Daniel Freedman said... % Hi, Hello! % % Apologies upfront if this is well-known, but I searched mutt.org's FAQ % and manual, google's linux area , deja, etc. and came up completely % empty. % % I'd very much like to be able to set a message's status to 'deleted', % but: without synchronizing my mailbox/folder so as to actually expunge ... % similar, but I'd prefer to be unanbiguous in my mind and use the % DELETE flag instead. While that makes some sense, and I can understand your thoughts about threading becoming messy, that is not available in mutt. You can either quit or change and that will both sync your mailbox and mark items as old if you have mark_old set or you can just sync (bound by default to $) to write flag settings and purge deleted items, but there's no way to keep them around. % % Thanks so much for the suggestions (just a pointer to the right % document would also be appreciated). All I can suggest is that you read your mail through an IMAP connection, which apparently does allow you to store a 'D'elete flag across sessions. You might, though it's somewhat messy, whip up a macro that sets the X-Label: field to anything you wish; you could later go back and limit your view to just those messages and then truly delete them. You can even display the X-Label field in your index, so you could just make it 'D' and have another status-like column to show you what is what. If I were to do that, though, I'd probably set the field to something like the day of the month or even the julian day and then delete only the oldest marked messages. % % Take care, HTH HAND % % Daniel % % % PS. Please cc me on replies as I don't subscribe. Thanks so much. Ah, but you should ;-) % % -- % Daniel A. Freedman % Laboratory for Atomic and Solid State Physics % Department of Physics % Cornell University :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: Question regarding clearsigning emails automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 "WK" == Werner Koch "Re: Question regarding clearsigning emails automatically" Thu, 14 Dec 2000 18:24:10 +0100 WK On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Champion wrote: Having the signatures come up, and my mailer and OpenPGP client freeze while I wait to download a signature that might and might not be on the WK And on a slow box (mine) it even freezes during signature WK verification. It would be much better if Mutt has an option to WK check signatures on demand and not every time you open that WK message. If you have had the experience of having nasty mail forged with your name and header sender information you will value the option of establishing the practice of _always_ signing your mail so that you can be more credible when you disclaim any unsigned mail attributed to you. I have also come to the opinion that signing all mail and eccrypting all private mail whose recipient will stand for it is not only wise self interest but also a boon to the cause of encouraging widespread acceptance and use of encryption. jam -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: OpenPGP encrypted mail preferred. See http://www.gnupg.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAjo6MPkACgkQUEvv1b/iXy8SdACfSF1LaIq7r7QFFkXf3xNLwjXa KhkAn37CV7j4SxoJz+3QlAKeVWFjyxMy =cgVj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On 15, Dec, 2000 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote: yes, procmail v3.15 2000/08/25 ! with procmail v3.13 + mbox everything worked fine. Hve you appended a '/' to your mailboxes? HTH Morten -- Morten Liebach [EMAIL PROTECTED] || http://home1.stofanet.dk/liebach Get my PGP-key: http://home1.stofanet.dk/pgpkey.html UNIX, reach out and grep someone!
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:15:05PM +0100, Morten Liebach wrote: On 15, Dec, 2000 at 02:22:31PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote: yes, procmail v3.15 2000/08/25 ! with procmail v3.13 + mbox everything worked fine. Hve you appended a '/' to your mailboxes? the filtering rule seems to be ok: :0 * ^TO_.*[EMAIL PROTECTED] /PC-Special/ if this rule shouldn´t be correct procmail has to write a error in the logfile or? and this logfile isn´t created in any case :( I believe the failure is qmail. but how does I have to start qmail if I want to preline procmail? Marco -- Marco Ahrendt phone : +49-341-98-474-0 adconsys AGfax : +49-341-98-474-59 Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 19email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04107 Leipzig/Germany gnupg key at www.aktex.net/marco_work.asc
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:49:22PM +0100, Morten Liebach wrote: # This is ~/.qmail for Morten Liebach |preline /usr/local/bin/procmail It work fine, my /var/qmail/rc: #!/bin/sh exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start ./Maildir/ splogger qmail This is what I think is the places where the mistake is most likely. If not, I can't really think of anything else right now. I added the |preline command into .qmail and now the pre command works fine. procmail gives an error but I dunno why. I think the procmail recipe is wrong: Unable to treat as directory "/PC-Special-Team" procmail: Error while writing to "/PC-Special-Team" how I have to copy to a Maildir ? thx ! Marco -- Marco Ahrendt phone : +49-341-98-474-0 adconsys AGfax : +49-341-98-474-59 Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 19email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04107 Leipzig/Germany gnupg key at www.aktex.net/marco_work.asc
help: high bit chars turned to '?'
Can someone suggest a method of tracking down this problem? I have a few emails in my mailbox which contain iso8859-2 characters, but Mutt insists on displaying them all as '?'. Is this a configuration option I have misset somewhere? -- Maciej Kalisiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dgp.toronto.edu/~mac
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On 15, Dec, 2000 at 07:13:42PM +0100, Marco Ahrendt wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:49:22PM +0100, Morten Liebach wrote: # This is ~/.qmail for Morten Liebach |preline /usr/local/bin/procmail It work fine, my /var/qmail/rc: #!/bin/sh exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ qmail-start ./Maildir/ splogger qmail This is what I think is the places where the mistake is most likely. If not, I can't really think of anything else right now. I added the |preline command into .qmail and now the pre command works fine. procmail gives an error but I dunno why. I think the procmail recipe is wrong: Unable to treat as directory "/PC-Special-Team" procmail: Error while writing to "/PC-Special-Team" Is "PC-Special-Team" a maildir or is it mbox? If mbox you'll have to convert it to maildir, there's some scripts to do that, try mbox2maildir on freshmeat. Remember the trailing '/' in your $HOME/.procmailrc. :-) HTH Morten -- UNIX, reach out and grep someone!
Re: help: high bit chars turned to '?'
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:02:57PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: Sorry I can't help, but I get this too on occasion and would love to fix it. Last time I got it I asked my friend what he did with the email he sent and he said he used Word as the editor for Outlook. Double wammy, eh? *ouch* What I ended up doing was using a utf-8 xterm, and running mutt with set charset=utf-8. This shows all foreign characters, including Japanese ones, but every once in a while I get email that shows up incorrectly. Of course, now that I'm talking about it, I can't find any messages with this problem. (even though I _just_ looked at one). ttyl, -- Josh Huber | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/6B21489A 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A PGP signature
Re: keeping folder/mailbox status state upon exit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:03:43PM -0500, Daniel Freedman wrote: Hi, Apologies upfront if this is well-known, but I searched mutt.org's FAQ and manual, google's linux area , deja, etc. and came up completely empty. At least you tried, I guess, which is better than some people do. I'd very much like to be able to set a message's status to 'deleted', but: without synchronizing my mailbox/folder so as to actually expunge the message, I'd like to be able to either quit mutt or just change folders, and have these messages' status be kept. I'm sure that others have similarly wanted to use some method like this especially when tracking a high-volume mailing list, where I wouldn't want to prematurely expunge messages I've deleted, or else future replies on the list wouldn't obviously be threaded under the ones I've read. I could imagine using the OLD versus NEW flags to accomplish something similar, but I'd prefer to be unanbiguous in my mind and use the DELETE flag instead. You can always 'x' (with the default keybindings) in the index if you'd like. That won't write anything though. The best I can tell you is, Use the source, Luke! PS. Please cc me on replies as I don't subscribe. Thanks so much. I've seen that a lot lately, and I'm pretty sure is discouraged. - -- Oo---o, Oo---o, O-weem-oh-wum-ooo-ayyy In the jungle, the silicon jungle, the process sleeps tonight. Joe Philipps [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.philippsfamily.org/Joe/ public PGP/GPG key 0xFA029353 available via http://www.keyserver.net -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjo6mrQACgkQqnHkFvoCk1PDMQCgzYcgEnQgELVTMlWK8U8OArPR x84AoM8/45HSdmEHOmBgFGD4affdqOE3 =0Mlu -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: keeping folder/mailbox status state upon exit
David (and others on list), Hi, again. Thanks for the advice so far. (I took your suggestion and joined the list.) So, I understand from you that what I had hoped to do is not possible in mutt. Instead, I think I'm going to turn the question now on its head, question _my_ assumptions in reading mailing list mail and ask for further advice :). I come from pine (which I never liked) and mh (which I was quite fond of, though not as much as mutt, but in any case isn't available in my present computing environment; neither for that matter do the sysadmins support IMAP for the workaround you propose; and I've found some relatively easy things like procmail are hard here since I'm on an AFS cell). Anyway... I'd appreciate your (and/or other peoples') suggestions for efficiently dealing with high-traffic mailing lists (100+ messages per day each). I use to do digests in pine with the persistent delete flags I was hoping for here, but now I find that mutt's threading of messages, combined with procmail's sorting them into individual inboxes per mailing list, allows me to be probably 5-10 times more efficient in handling mail than the previous digest way (and _especially_ simplifies replying to such mail). But, how do most people handle keeping track of which mail has been read? flags? old/new? Or what else can people suggest to further ease things? Thanks so very much for any and all replies. Take care, Daniel On Fri, Dec 15, 2000, David T-G wrote: Daniel -- ...and then Daniel Freedman said... % Hi, Hello! % % Apologies upfront if this is well-known, but I searched mutt.org's FAQ % and manual, google's linux area , deja, etc. and came up completely % empty. % % I'd very much like to be able to set a message's status to 'deleted', % but: without synchronizing my mailbox/folder so as to actually expunge ... % similar, but I'd prefer to be unanbiguous in my mind and use the % DELETE flag instead. While that makes some sense, and I can understand your thoughts about threading becoming messy, that is not available in mutt. You can either quit or change and that will both sync your mailbox and mark items as old if you have mark_old set or you can just sync (bound by default to $) to write flag settings and purge deleted items, but there's no way to keep them around. % % Thanks so much for the suggestions (just a pointer to the right % document would also be appreciated). All I can suggest is that you read your mail through an IMAP connection, which apparently does allow you to store a 'D'elete flag across sessions. You might, though it's somewhat messy, whip up a macro that sets the X-Label: field to anything you wish; you could later go back and limit your view to just those messages and then truly delete them. You can even display the X-Label field in your index, so you could just make it 'D' and have another status-like column to show you what is what. If I were to do that, though, I'd probably set the field to something like the day of the month or even the julian day and then delete only the oldest marked messages. % % Take care, HTH HAND % % Daniel % % % PS. Please cc me on replies as I don't subscribe. Thanks so much. Ah, but you should ;-) % % -- % Daniel A. Freedman % Laboratory for Atomic and Solid State Physics % Department of Physics % Cornell University :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bigfoot.com/~davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! -- Daniel A. Freedman Laboratory for Atomic and Solid State Physics Department of Physics Cornell University
Re: index_format: ANSI colors
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:34:23PM + or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Bjornar Ness thought: Hello fellow mutt users. I want to colorize my index a bit more. How do I do this? Tried with some ansi sequences.. did not work, why? I think it would be great to be able to do this. Depends on the sort of colourising you mean. I use the "color" command to set up my index. The following set colours: * Unread mails addressed _directly_ to me Bright Yellow * Unread mails from lists Bright Red * Read mails from lists magenta * Mails I've replied to Bright Blue * All other mails are Yellow * The highlight bar is bright Yellow on Blue color index yellow default "~A" color index magenta default "~l" color index brightyellow default "~N" color index brightred default "~N~l" color index brightblue default "~Q" color indicator brightyellow blue Is that what you mean? And one more thing.. mutt really needs a simple, yet powerful to/from/cc/?? procmailrc frontend. Nice for all of us I think. Could work allmost like the a(lias) command. That would be pretty all right... -- Conor Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Domestic Sysadmin :-) - 10:09pm up 14 days, 6 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00
Re: qmail, procmail and maildir
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 07:29:19PM +0100, Morten Liebach wrote: Unable to treat as directory "/PC-Special-Team" procmail: Error while writing to "/PC-Special-Team" Is "PC-Special-Team" a maildir or is it mbox? If mbox you'll have to convert it to maildir, there's some scripts to do that, try mbox2maildir on freshmeat. Remember the trailing '/' in your $HOME/.procmailrc. :-) Its a Maildir. Now it works fine! Thx everyone for help! Marco -- Marco Ahrendt phone : +49-341-98-474-0 adconsys AGfax : +49-341-98-474-59 Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 19email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04107 Leipzig/Germany gnupg key at www.aktex.net/marco_work.asc
