GPG sign error-message

2001-01-02 Thread Russell Hoover

When I sign a mail with GPG I get the following error-message:

gpg: skipped `my-secret-key-ID': this is a PGP generated ElGamal key which is not
secure for signatures!  Press any key to continue...

However, the recipient sees nothing wrong:

[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Jan  2 07:51:37 2001) --]
gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 02 06:26:09 2001 EST using DSA key ID my-public-key-ID
gpg: Good signature from "Russell Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[-- End of PGP output --]

This is with:

set pgp_sign_as=my-secret-key-ID

in my gpg.rc.

But when I put in my gpg.rc:

   set pgp_sign_as=my-PUBLIC-key-ID

I get no error message, but the recipient sees:

[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Jan  2 07:51:37 2001) --]
gpg: can't handle these multiple signatures
[-- End of PGP output --]

What am I dong wrong?
-- 
 // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //




Mutt and *nix clients and Qmail server

2001-01-02 Thread Subba Rao


I have no problem setting up Windows/OS/2 clients to connect to the Qmail
server to relay the messages. The problem I am facing now is *nix clients. It
looks like the *nix clients (with the exception of Pine) do require a local
SMTP server to relay to the main SMTP server. One of the clients, I am using
is mutt. It doesn't look like Mutt can send the message directly to the
relaying SMTP server.

Is there a Qmail solution to secure the *nix clients? I prefer not to run
sendmail on the local clients for their mail to go out. Are there any work
arounds for the Mutt client?

Thank you in advance for any info or ideas.
-- 

Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/



Re: Mutt and *nix clients and Qmail server

2001-01-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Subba Rao proclaimed on mutt-users that: 

 I have no problem setting up Windows/OS/2 clients to connect to the Qmail
 server to relay the messages. The problem I am facing now is *nix clients. It
 looks like the *nix clients (with the exception of Pine) do require a local
 SMTP server to relay to the main SMTP server. One of the clients, I am using
 is mutt. It doesn't look like Mutt can send the message directly to the
 relaying SMTP server.
 
 Use something like masqmail / nullmailer and such on the local unix clients.

--suresh

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin



Re: Mutt and *nix clients and Qmail server

2001-01-02 Thread Peter Pentchev

On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 07:53:54PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 Subba Rao proclaimed on mutt-users that: 
 
  I have no problem setting up Windows/OS/2 clients to connect to the Qmail
  server to relay the messages. The problem I am facing now is *nix clients. It
  looks like the *nix clients (with the exception of Pine) do require a local
  SMTP server to relay to the main SMTP server. One of the clients, I am using
  is mutt. It doesn't look like Mutt can send the message directly to the
  relaying SMTP server.
  
  Use something like masqmail / nullmailer and such on the local unix clients.

The point is, Unix mail clients do not require a local SMTP server per se;
they require a sendmail-like *program* to.. well.. to send mail :)
It's much easier - and less error-prone - for mail clients to know they
have to execute such-and-such program and pass such-and-such parameters
to it, than to make all mail clients actually network-aware SMTP clients
(with all the subtleties of SMTP and any network protocol - response
parsing and such..)

So, just as Suresh suggested, look into some mail delivery agents that
act like the sendmail *program*, not SMTP server, and take care of all
the SMTP talk.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
I've heard that this sentence is a rumor.



Re: GPG sign error-message

2001-01-02 Thread Russell Hoover

On Tue 01/02/01 at 08:24 AM -0500, Russell Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 When I sign a mail with GPG I get the following error-message:
 gpg: skipped `my-secret-key-ID': this is a PGP generated ElGamal key which is not
 secure for signatures!  Press any key to continue...

I commented-out the "set pgp_sign_as" setting in my gpg.rc, and that solved
the problem, though I don't know that this might adversely affect other
things.

Anyone know if it will?
-- 
 // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //