test
I keep getting bounced off of lists, just checking
PGP old/new headers?
Since I switched from PGP to GPG mutt works as advertised with GPG/PGP except, I only can use new headers (MIME multi- part), which my friends in the land of Windoz can not deal with. I can't get it to send old inline for them. I tried "set pgp_create_traditional = ask-no" but responding yes to the query gives no header/inline/sig/encrypt at all. Any help? Regards, Dave
Mark all messages in folder read
Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? regards, Stefan
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? Yes, of course. Tag all messages (T .*), and then remove N flag from all of them (W N). Here's macro binding it to .c sequence: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Best regards, -- +[: phaust (at) users.sourceforge.net :]+---+[: http://www.phaust.z.pl/ :]+ +[: the slPIM project - addrbook 4 mutt - http://slpim.sourceforge.net/ :]+ +[: GPG fingerprint: B7F4 4602 FAF3 00B3 C5FE B13C AD0F BD23 366E EE42 :]+ +- Eat Healthy, Exercise, and Die Anyway ...
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
On 2001.03.18, in 20010318211124.A574@madmachine, "phaust" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? Yes, of course. Tag all messages (T .*), and then remove N flag from all of them (W N). Here's macro binding it to .c sequence: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster than "." or ".*". The latter performs a regular expression match against all messages, while the former just selects everything with no further criteria. -- -D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]NSITUniversity of Chicago
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
Hi. On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 09:11:24PM +0100, phaust wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Oops, it's not what-i've-meant : Better try this: macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up" Best regards, -- +[: phaust (at) users.sourceforge.net :]+---+[: http://www.phaust.z.pl/ :]+ +[: the slPIM project - addrbook 4 mutt - http://slpim.sourceforge.net/ :]+ +- WORK: Something to do between breaks.
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
* Stefan Schwandter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010318 20:35]: is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? Try adding a macro like that in your $HOME/.muttrc: macro index \ec "T.*\n;WN;WO^T.*\n" "catch up" This should clear all 'N' and 'O' indicator flags on ESC-c. Best regards - Juergen.
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 04:13:12PM -0600, David Champion wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster than "." or ".*". The latter performs a regular expression match against all messages, while the former just selects everything with no further criteria. Thanks, works great! regards, Stefan
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:16:22PM +0100, phaust wrote: macro .c "T.*\nWN" "Cath up" Oops, it's not what-i've-meant : Better try this: macro index .c "T.*\n;WN" "Cath up" I figured it out, thanks :-) regards, Stefan
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:47:58PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote: Hello all, is there a way to quickly mark all messages in a mail folder (similar to do a catch up in a newsreader) ? T.enter;^R That is: T.enter Tag all messages matching '.' (means all of them) ;^R Mark all tagged messages (threades) as read (that's ctrl-r) Finally you can untag all the messages with ^T.enter -- Tommi Komulainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG 1024D/68388EE66FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6 PGP signature
Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1
I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1. It's default keyboard mapping has apparently changed with the upgrade, now defaulting to "xterm (XFree 4.x.x)" This mapping does not work correctly in Mutt. Specifically, the backspace, home and end key do not work. (They should provide scroll up, top and bottom of message respectively). The mapping within Konsole which does work is labeled "xterm (XFree 3.x.x). It does map these keys correctly. Is this an issue? This problem does not occur within a plain xterm, nor an rxvt. -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT
Re: Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1
Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals? tw Le jour Sun Mar 18, 2001 at 05:49:30PM +, John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) a ecrit... I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1. It's default keyboard mapping has apparently changed with the upgrade, now defaulting to "xterm (XFree 4.x.x)" This mapping does not work correctly in Mutt. Specifically, the backspace, home and end key do not work. (They should provide scroll up, top and bottom of message respectively). The mapping within Konsole which does work is labeled "xterm (XFree 3.x.x). It does map these keys correctly. Is this an issue? This problem does not occur within a plain xterm, nor an rxvt. -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT
Re: Mutt keymapping problem in KDE2.1 Konsole 1.0.1
On 03/18/01, 06:11:30PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whouldn't the problem lie with how your editor handles the various terminals? tw I wouldn't' think so. Konsole under KDE 2.0 worked just fine with default settings. As noted, mutt works fine with other terminals and with what would appear to be an older keyboard mapping. The question strikes me as whether there is any issue with the newer (4.x.x) mapping provided in Konsole ... as this is the piece that just changed on my machine I'd first suspect the problem to be there. John Le jour Sun Mar 18, 2001 at 05:49:30PM +, John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) a ecrit... I just upgraded to KDE2.1. I run Mutt within a Konsole version 1.0.1. It's default keyboard mapping has apparently changed with the upgrade, now defaulting to "xterm (XFree 4.x.x)" This mapping does not work correctly in Mutt. Specifically, the backspace, home and end key do not work. (They should provide scroll up, top and bottom of message respectively). The mapping within Konsole which does work is labeled "xterm (XFree 3.x.x). It does map these keys correctly. Is this an issue? This problem does not occur within a plain xterm, nor an rxvt. -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT
Re: Mark all messages in folder read
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 16:13:12 -0600, David Champion wrote: Just a small tip: in a large mailbox, tagging "~A" is noticeably faster than "." No, it is not. There are equal fast because of a little hack in the code (in the function mutt_check_simple in pattern.c) which checks for "." and converts it to "~". or ".*". The latter performs a regular expression match against all messages, while the former just selects everything with no further criteria. Yes, that's true for ".*".
Re: exim and maildir/header sorting
Tom von Schwerdtner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
1) Is there anyway to sort the headers so they display in a certain order in
mutt? If not, can you suggest a way to do this (using exim maybe, or
procmail)?
# Specify the order of the headers to appear when displaying a message
# hdr_order hdr1 [ hdr2 ... ]
unhdr_order * # forget the previous settings
hdr_order date from subject to cc
2) Anyone out there using mutt with a local maildir as opposed to mbox? Any
comments on advantages or just things you like over the usual mbox setup?
Any suggestions/pointers as to how I should go about making the switch from
mbox to maildir (can exim do it?)?
First, use a mbox to maildir type converter to migrate your existing mails
(plenty available at http://www.cr.yp.to)
Second, reconfigure sendmail to deliver to maildirs (actually, you reconfigure
your local delivery agent - newer procmails do maildir delivery, or try
maildrop - http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop ..)
re exim - yeah, exim can easily do maildirs. no hassles
This transport is for courier imap's vmailmgr -
vmailmgr_trn:
driver = appendfile
maildir_format = true
directory = /var/${domain}/users/${local_part}
delivery_date_add
envelope_to_add
return_path_add
Third, there's a variable $mbox_type - set it to "maildir" in .muttrc
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
