Re: [OT] lbdb: sorting by real name
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: I have lbdb (0.18.5) on my Debian potato system. My question: (Q)uery in Mutt gives me a list sorted alphanumerically by email-adresses (second column in Mutt, first in ~/.lbdb/m_inmail.list). Can I change this somehow, display the list sorted by real name in Mutt? The manual page for lbdbq documents the LBDB sort options. Didn't that work for you? -- Dave Pearson: | lbdb.el - LBDB interface. http://www.davep.org/ | sawfish.el - Sawfish mode. Emacs: | uptimes.el - Record emacs uptimes. http://www.davep.org/emacs/ | quickurl.el - Recall lists of URLs.
Re: Folder selection list
On (12/04/01 22:31), Russell Hoover wrote: On Wed 04/11/01 at 12:21 PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I run mutt -y, or when I change folders using c and ?, os it possible to get it to display only folders containing new mail? Otherwise I have two screensful of folders at least. Try tab. Tab allows me to view all the mailboxes listed as mailboxes in my .muttrc, including those in subdirectories. It doesn't allow me to view only those mailboxes containing new mail. If there's nothing in existence, can anyone think of a macro I could set to do this? Ailbhe -- Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/
Re: [OT] lbdb: sorting by real name
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-13 11:34 +0200: On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:56:28PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: I have lbdb (0.18.5) on my Debian potato system. My question: (Q)uery in Mutt gives me a list sorted alphanumerically by email-adresses (second column in Mutt, first in ~/.lbdb/m_inmail.list). Can I change this somehow, display the list sorted by real name in Mutt? The manual page for lbdbq documents the LBDB sort options. Didn't that work for you? No! "man lbdbq" gives me a Sept 1999 version that doesn't mention any sort options. Can you give me a clue? Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Re: pgp-hook
On 2001-04-13 12:55:46 +0200, Andre Berger wrote: set pgp_sign_as="usual@adress" pgp-hook '~h other@address' usual@address pgp-hook other@address usual@address ... would be correct. -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to display a mail in raw format
On 04/13/01, 08:39:03AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
Dave Pearson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 04/13/2001:
Toggling header mode ("h") will let you see all the headers in the mutt
pager, but it won't show you the entire e-mail as "raw" since it still
parser MIME. Editing the messages ("e") doesn't show you all the headers
(at least, not in v1.2.4i that I'm running).
Depends on the editor, perhaps. With vim 5.7 all headers are visible.
How does choice of editor affect which headers are passed to it for editing
by mutt?
I did hit 'h' to show all the headers, and then 'e' to edit the
message in $editor, and all headers were displayed and editable.
If you hit 'e', without turning off header weeding, then $editor
will only open up what you see. Does that work for anyone else?
If I press 'e' with $editor set to vim, I see all headers. Having
pressed 'h' before makes no difference. I have not experimented with
other editors (emacs, joe, pico, etc) to see if there is any difference
in behavior.
John
(darren)
--
What you do instead of your real work *is* your real work.
-- Roger Ebert
--
John P. Verel
Norwalk, CT
Re: How to display a mail in raw format
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:42:52PM -0400, John P. Verel wrote:
On 04/12/01, 05:22:21PM -0400, Mike Broome wrote:
I've found that piping the message out to cat (eg. "|cat") or more
(eg. "|more") does the trick for me. This will dump the entire
message, including header, MIME separators, unrecognized (to mutt)
attachments.
Toggling header mode ("h") will let you see all the headers in the
mutt pager, but it won't show you the entire e-mail as "raw" since it
still parser MIME. Editing the messages ("e") doesn't show you all the
headers (at least, not in v1.2.4i that I'm running).
Depends on the editor, perhaps. With vim 5.7 all headers are visible.
I don't see how it could plausibly depend on the editor since it's mutt
that decides what to give to the editor to edit.
But now that I look at it in more detail, it looks like I actually *am*
getting all the headers in the editor (of course, I have to have
"edit_hdrs" set in .muttrc to get any headers). I thought I wasn't
getting all the Received: lines and the initial From_ line, but if I
scroll up in the editor, I see them. It must have been an artifact of
invoking vim with the argument '+/^$' to have it search for the first
blank line; that scrolls most of the header lines off the screen.
Mike
--
Mike Broome
mbroome(at)employees.org
Re: address book
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:00:36PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote: I've posted a complete addressbook for use with the Query function and some mutt macros to add addresses to it the way you intend to do it. It's some months ago. If there's some interest I could repost it or put it onto my website. I've checked it. I sent this script on Dec 21st 2000. -- Christian Ordig | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ Germany |eMail: Christian Ordig [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP signature
Re: pgp-hook
* Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-13 15:39 +0200: On 2001-04-13 12:55:46 +0200, Andre Berger wrote: set pgp_sign_as="usual@adress" pgp-hook '~h other@address' usual@address pgp-hook other@address usual@address Error in /home/andre/.mutt.gpg, line 2: bad formatted command string Error in /home/andre/.muttrc, line 3: source: errors in /home/andre/.mutt.gpg source: errors in /home/andre/.muttrc Press any key to continue... Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PGP signature
Re: How to display a mail in raw format
On 2001-04-13 09:33:17 -0400, John P. Verel wrote: If I press 'e' with $editor set to vim, I see all headers. Having pressed 'h' before makes no difference. I have not experimented with other editors (emacs, joe, pico, etc) to see if there is any difference in behavior. You may wish to make sure that you both have bound edit-message to 'e', and not resend-mesasge. -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to display a mail in raw format
On 04/13/01, 04:10:46PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: On 2001-04-13 09:33:17 -0400, John P. Verel wrote: If I press 'e' with $editor set to vim, I see all headers. Having pressed 'h' before makes no difference. I have not experimented with other editors (emacs, joe, pico, etc) to see if there is any difference in behavior. You may wish to make sure that you both have bound edit-message to 'e', and not resend-mesasge. Confirmed. My bindings are default as respects these. Escape e yields resend, e opens vim. Resend-message produces just the standard headers. e produces the whole landslide of 'em :) John -- Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- John P. Verel Norwalk, CT
Mutt and signing email
I have the following setting in my .muttrc and I am trying to sign the email in clear text before sending it out. set pgp_autosign=yes set pgp_list_secring_command=~/.gnupg/secring.gpg set pgp_list_pubring_command=~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg When I send myself a test message, Mutt prompts me for PGP password. I am using GPG and typed in the GPG password, then the following error message shows up, "Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2)" I am using the "Mutt-i, GnuPG and PGP Howto" document to sign my email. In the document (section 6.5), it recommends the use of the following command, set pgp_default_version=gpg When I insert this command in .muttrc, Mutt complains that the command doesn't exist. I do not see it in the Mutt manual either. Is there any other howto or manual that explains, how to sign the email and how to verify received email? Thank you in advance. -- Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/subba9/ GPG public key ID 27FC9217
Re: [OT] lbdb: sorting by real name
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:56:38PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-13 11:34 +0200: The manual page for lbdbq documents the LBDB sort options. Didn't that work for you? No! "man lbdbq" gives me a Sept 1999 version that doesn't mention any sort options. Can you give me a clue? I'd start by suggesting that you upgrade lbdb to the latest version. If the manual page doesn't mention a sort option then there's every chance that the version you've got there doesn't support sorting. -- Dave Pearson: | lbdb.el - LBDB interface. http://www.davep.org/ | sawfish.el - Sawfish mode. Emacs: | uptimes.el - Record emacs uptimes. http://www.davep.org/emacs/ | quickurl.el - Recall lists of URLs.
IMAP Question
I've been using imap with mutt for some time, but there is one thing that I still can't figure out. How do I tell mutt to save sent messages to an imap folder? I have attched my .muttrc, with the comments stripped out. -- Jacob Kuntz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://underworld.net/~jake
Priveledge Problem with mutt
I am running mutt 1.2.5 on Sun Solaris 2.8 I am getting the following error when I execute mutt in command mode I don't want to run with priveleges! If anyone could help, I would appreciate it.
Re: Mutt and Japanese
Joss Winn wrote:- Well, Neil, I have good news for you! First, I am using the default version of Mutt that comes with SUSE 7.1 PPC (which has very good Japanese support in it for the first time). It is version 1.3.12i-0. I do not think it was patched for Japanese as the SUSE developer working on Japanese support has not had anything to do with Mutt. I'm using Debian's 1.3.17i which is lightly patched, if at all. The lines that worked for me are: setcharset="euc-jp" setsendcharset="us-ascii:iso-2022-jp" setrfc2047_parameters=yes I've no idea what the last one does or if it really is that important. Something to do with attachments? So, to summarise, I am running an English language environment, calling applications for Japanese with LANG=ja_JP app. I am using the above version of Mutt in a kterm with canna and kinput2. My Mutt folder menu has a 月 where the month column is, and all Japenese sent to me has clearly visible subject lines and body text. I use the alpha version of vim without any problems to compose messages. That's peculiar - it doesn't work for me. I see Japanese dates in the date column, unlike you. My LANG is ja_JP.EUC-JP, but even with just ja_JP I still get them. However, after saving my Japanese file in emacs as iso-2022-jp, when it returns to Mutt it is all screwed up - there are no Japanese characters, just garbage as the Subject and body. What do you have as your pager settings? Would you mind sending me your whole .muttrc? The really odd thing is that I can read old Japanese mails fine. I suspect Mutt is not treating the newly created mail as iso-2022-jp; but I have no idea why. With these applications I'm always a bit disappointed at how slowly the Japanese people get their patches in the mainstream, and their fixes always seem to be with just Japanese in mind, and not the "big picture" i.e. doing something general so that it can work for any language. Neil.
Re: [OT] lbdb: sorting by real name
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-13 21:58 +0200: On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:56:38PM +0200, Andre Berger wrote: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-13 11:34 +0200: The manual page for lbdbq documents the LBDB sort options. Didn't that work for you? No! "man lbdbq" gives me a Sept 1999 version that doesn't mention any sort options. Can you give me a clue? I'd start by suggesting that you upgrade lbdb to the latest version. If the manual page doesn't mention a sort option then there's every chance that the version you've got there doesn't support sorting. Very good advice. Did that, problem solved. Debian _is_ conservative... Andre Berger[[EMAIL PROTECTED]] PGP signature
Re: IMAP Question
Jacob Kuntz muttered:
I've been using imap with mutt for some time, but there is one thing that I
still can't figure out. How do I tell mutt to save sent messages to an imap
folder?
Something like:
s{imapserver}FolderName
Here's an example that saves sent items to an imap folder:
# deposit outgoing foobar.com email into 'Sent Items' folder.
fcc-hook "~t foobar.com" '{mail.foobar.com:43}Sent Items'
I hope this helps.
-Jim
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Replace Z's with E's to reply)
If NT is your answer, you don't understand the question.
-Anonymous
PGP signature
Re: IMAP Question
At 0503 hours on 13 Apr 2001 , Jacob Kuntz gave the following orders: I have attched my .muttrc, with the comments stripped out. Are you sure? I press 'v', and I don't see it... nor is it inline. Re Tony -- Is that an African or European swallow? Sick of AOL owned Instant Messaging? Try http://www.jabber.org http://dual-enforcers.net/tonys_public.key PGP signature
Re: Mutt and signing email
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:10:24PM +, Subba Rao wrote: I have the following setting in my .muttrc and I am trying to sign the email in clear text before sending it out. set pgp_autosign=yes set pgp_list_secring_command=~/.gnupg/secring.gpg set pgp_list_pubring_command=~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg Those look an awful lot like file specifications, and not commands. Commands would be more like /usr/bin/gpg. -- Oo---o, Oo---o, O-weem-oh-wum-ooo-ayyy In the jungle, the silicon jungle, the process sleeps tonight. Joe Philipps joe -a-t- philippsfamily.org, http://www.philippsfamily.org/Joe/ public PGP/GPG key 0xFA029353 available via http://www.keyserver.net PGP signature
Which Keyserver???
I am trying to verify the keys from a signed email. Mutt seems to be trying to connect to the www.keyserver.net, but always get the following error, [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Apr 13 20:00:48 2001) --] gpg: Signature made Tue Apr 10 01:15:43 2001 /etc/localtime using RSA key ID +C1234A6D gpg: requesting key C1234A6D from www.keyserver.net ... gpg: [fd 6]: read error: Connection reset by peer gpg: Total number processed: 0 gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found [-- End of PGP output --] The key id here has been changed. When I try to verify the key manually at the www.keyserver.net, there is no key to be found. What are the commonly used key servers? Are they different for GPG and PGP? Thank you in advance for any info. -- Subba Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.home.net/subba9/ GPG public key ID 27FC9217
Re: Appending to the header
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:28:28AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Gary Jones proclaimed on mutt-users that: On 11 Apr 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Either volkov / other nntp patches to mutt, or a mail2news gateway. Mail2news is the way I'd do it. There's a nice mini-How-To which is easy to follow, so its not daunting or complicated at all. I guess you'd set up a dummy email user, setup procmail for it, and mail the gnu/mailman has a rather nice builtin mail2news gateway capablity. Can this be used on its own without installing the whole of mailman? Cheers, Brian. -s announcements to that user. As if by magic the news article will appear. -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin -- Associate Professor Brian Salter-Duke (Brian Duke) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chemistry, School of BECS, SITE, NT University, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia. Phone 08-89466702. Fax 08-89466847. http://www.smps.ntu.edu.au/
Re: Appending to the header
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 09:38:05AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke typed: gnu/mailman has a rather nice builtin mail2news gateway capablity. Can this be used on its own without installing the whole of mailman? Dont think so. GNU/Mailman is quite easy to install and configure though, not like majordomo, say. -s -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
Re: Priveledge Problem with mutt
At 14:26 -0400 13 Apr 2001, Lawrence Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am getting the following error when I execute mutt in command mode I don't want to run with priveleges! Mutt was installed setuid and/or setgid. It doesn't need to be run with any extra privileges, so it shouldn't be installed in that way. Having it installed that way may lead to security problems, so it will refuse to do anything. To fix the problem run the following command as root: chmod ug-s `which mutt` -- Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/ The only disadvantage I see is that it would force everyone to get Perl. Horrors. :-)--Larry Wall
Bug or feature?
Still feeling out mutt, so if I'm retreading old issues, sorry. I had: set copy = yes set record = +Sent set folder = "~/nsmail" # converted from netscape today When I would send out mail, it would not save a copy in Sent. I saw an error message flash by and tracked it down to something along the lines of "File does not exist: /home/todd/Mail/Sent" Huh? I have the path set for ~/nsmail. I verified that the word "Mail" was nowhere to be found in any of my configuration files. During troubleshooting, I renamed nsmail to Mail and modified the appropriate directives in config files .muttrc and .procmailrc. Lo and behold, it works properly. Is this a bug or a feature? -- Blue skies... Todd | Get a bigger hammer! | Sometimes you get what you want. | | http://www.mrball.net | Sometimes you get experience. | | http://faq.mrball.net | --unknown origin |
