Re: Changing my From field
On (03/10/01 23:45), René Clerc wrote: * Zane Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-10-2001 20:25]: | send-hook (~t .*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' | send-hook (~t !.*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Change (~t !.*caltech.edu) from the second rule to . (whithout quotes) This is the default rule. But do it in this order: send-hook (~t .) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook (~t .*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' If you reverse these, everything will match the default rule, with no exceptions for caltech.edu. Ailbhe -- Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/
Re: How to un-attach?
Justin R. Miller writes: Thus spake John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I sometimes accidentally attach the wrong file to a message. I can't figure out how to to un-attach it. Can anyone help on this? Try highlighting the attachment in the compose menu and hitting 'D' (however, not 'd', which changes the description of the attachment.) And it's even documented ;) Press ? in the send menu. D detach-filedelete the current entry
Re: Changing my From field
On (03/10/01 23:45), René Clerc wrote: * Zane Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-10-2001 20:25]: | send-hook (~t .*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' | send-hook (~t !.*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Change (~t !.*caltech.edu) from the second rule to . (whithout quotes) This is the default rule. But do it in this order: send-hook (~t .) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' send-hook (~t .*caltech.edu) 'my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]' If you reverse these, everything will match the default rule, with no exceptions for caltech.edu. Ailbhe -- Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/
Re: default: no such color
Lukas -- ...and then Lukas Ruf said... % Hi there, Hello! % % for a couple of months I am using mutt, under Linux since it's been ... % % So the question: where can I define the color default % such that the configuration of my muttrc: % color normal default default # normal text % works. I don't know much about color, but this sounds familiar. Are you compiled with ncurses or slang? In the case of the latter, I think you set an environment variable FOREGROUND or DEFAULTFG or some such (and the same for background). You might check the archives... % % Thanks for any help! HTH HAND % % Lukas % -- % Lukas RufSwiss Federal Institute of Technology % Office: ETZ-G61.2 Computer Engineering and % Phone: +41/1/632 7312Networks Laboratory (TIK) % Fax: +41/1/632 1035 ETH Zentrum % PGP 2.6: ID D20BA2ED;Gloriastr. 35 % Fingerprint 6323 B9BC 9C8E 6563 B477 BADD FEA6 E6B7CH-8092 Zurich :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: multiple fcc usage
Andrew, et al -- ...and then Andrew Brown said... % what i'd like to do is have every outbound message saved to a folder ... % save an additional copy to a folder called, eg, sent-today. that way As you've seen, there's no stock way to do it right now. You might create a named pipe called sent or record, set your fcc to that, and have that feed a script that is smart enough to not only stuff a copy into sent-today but to also figure out where you'd really want the fcc to go and drop one there as well. All of the issues of file locking and of keeping the script on the back of the pipe running are left up to you :-) ... % is there a better way? It seems to me that what we really need is the capability of setting the fcc to a program, just like $signature can be. Now that I've come up with the brilliant solution, who can write the patch? :-) % % -- % |- CODE WARRIOR -| % [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ah! i see you have the internet % [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Brown)that goes *ping*! % [EMAIL PROTECTED] * information is power -- share the wealth. HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: howto force pgp_create_traditional
Viktor -- ...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said... % Hello, Hello! % % I use the pgp_outlook_compat patch along with pgp_create_traditional to % communicate with Outlook user while still signing my mails. Sounds good. % % Unfortunately, pgp_create_traditional is only used with us-ascii mails, % which kinda defeats its purpose in my case. This is extremely annoying, % because it basically means, that I cannot talk to non-English speaking % Outlook users. I don't really know a whole lot about this, but I thought that that was, indeed, one of the big limitations of traditional signing. Have any non-English-speaking LookOut! users sent you PGP-signed mail? I'd be quite interested in seeing what happens to their charset along the way. Maybe Micro$oft has managed to break this in a completely new way ;-) % % Thanks, % Viktor % -- % Viktor Rosenfeld % WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/ HTH HAND and I can't wait to see an Outhouse example :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: howto force pgp_create_traditional
David T-G wrote: % Unfortunately, pgp_create_traditional is only used with us-ascii mails, % which kinda defeats its purpose in my case. This is extremely annoying, % because it basically means, that I cannot talk to non-English speaking % Outlook users. I don't really know a whole lot about this, but I thought that that was, indeed, one of the big limitations of traditional signing. Have any non-English-speaking LookOut! users sent you PGP-signed mail? I'd be quite interested in seeing what happens to their charset along the way. Maybe Micro$oft has managed to break this in a completely new way ;-) Unfortunately, no, it seems that I'm the only user of PGP-signed mail in my Freundeskreis. (Don't know the English word and too lazy to look it up. Actually, a very cool German song is called like this. Anyway ...) In any case, I've found a solution that is acceptable to me, although it's just a dirty hack. I searched the archives again and came across a post by Bruno Postle, where he suggests the following macro: macro compose S Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0x82C08753 This was nothing for me, because in this case I had to turn off pgp_autosign, sign the message myself, send the message and then turn pgp_autosign back on. Too much work. However, using send-hooks and overloading the send-message-key, I now have the following: send-hook . set pgp_autosign; macro compose y send-message send-hook ~C [EMAIL PROTECTED] unset pgp_autosign; macro compose y 'Fgpg --armor --clearsign --local-user 0x23314340\nysend-message'# Christian Seewald And it works, perfectly. Cheers, Viktor -- Viktor Rosenfeld WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/ PGP signature
Re: difference between hdr_format and index_format
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 03:42:46PM, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
{ hdr_format, DT_SYN, R_NONE, UL index_format, 0 },
The DT_SYN meens hdr_format is the same as index_format. Here are some
other examples of DT_SYNs:
edit_hdrs and edit_headers
forw_decode and forward_decode
forw_format and forward_format
forw_quote and forward_quote
indent_str and indent_string
You get the point.
ok, thanks.
Shawn
---end quoted text---
cu,
binny
--
Para La Queja Mexica
Este Sueño De America
Celebramos La Aluna
De Siempre, Ahorita
-- Bertrand Cantat, Tostaky (Le Continent)
Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED]
°v° web : http://www.baby-linux.net
_o_ homepage : http://www.baby-linux.net/binny
icq uin : 99745024
Re: Fetch many mailboxes
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:28:59AM +0200, Brugier Pascal wrote: Helo I want to know if it's possible to fetch differents mail boxes (different user names and different passwords) on the same pop server at once fith the G command. And after i want to save the mails in different folders. I will filter them in the headers. if i understand, i can do this with : mailboxes and mbox-hook But can i have the choice to this either by the To:, From: or Subject: headers . Configure fetchmail to retrieve your email. Then have procmail deliver/filter it to the correct mailboxes. To make fetchmail be reawaked and immediately fetch mail with the G command add this to your .muttrc: # Turn the check mail option into running fetchmail to wake it up. # no point since I'm not using mutt's built in pop feature macro index G :unset wait_key\n|fetchmail\n:unset wait_key\n \ Wake up fetchmail to check the email again #macro browser G :unset wait_key\n|fetchmail\n:unset wait_key\n \ # Wake up fetchmail to check the email again macro pager G :unset wait_key\n|fetchmail\n:unset wait_key\n \ Wake up fetchmail to check the email again -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org Before you set out for revenge dig two graves. - Chinese Saying
Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?
Let's say person A mails me and cc:'s person B. Now, I want to reply to all of them, so I do a `g'roup-reply. It seems that mutt's default behavior is to compose a message to person A and cc:'d to me and person B. What's the rationale for this? I would prefer that 'g' only send the message to person A and cc: it to person B. That is, I don't want to receive a copy of the mail that I've sent. Is there a way to configure mutt to do this? I saw `metoo', but that appears to only apply to regular `r'eplies, and it is also off by default. thanks, david p.s.: please be sure to write directly to me, as i'm not on the mailing list. thanks!
Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?
msg.pgp
Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?
David Petrou wrote: I would prefer that 'g' only send the message to person A and cc: it to person B. That is, I don't want to receive a copy of the mail that I've sent. Is there a way to configure mutt to do this? I saw `metoo', but that appears to only apply to regular `r'eplies, and it is also off by default. i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is your 'alternates' line? i have this in my .muttrc set alternates = (will|william).*@.*(newdream|infinitejazz\.net|unixverse\.com) unset metoo (the last shouldn't be required since it's off by default but i have it anyway). w -- GPG Public Key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
how to fix non-MIME encoded PGP messages in my Fcc?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm using the pgp_create_traditional and pgp_outlook_compat settings to generate old (yes, broken) PGP messages (without the PGP/MIME headers). I also have my procmail set up to insert these headers when it intercepts something that looks like a PGP message, that doesn't already have the headers. However, if I send an encrypted message to someone else, and savea copy to an Fcc, it never goes through procmail, and thus never gets the header inserted, and so, when I go to view it, I just get the raw text of the PGP message - which is (hopefully!) completely indecipherable. What's the cleanest way to fix this? I could set up a macro that just runs formail and inserts it when I ask it to, but I'd rather set something up that automatically notices (like procmail does) and inserts the header, allowing Mutt to do all its GPG fanciness transparently. Any ideas? - -- Zane A. Crawford ,+ * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caltech Planetary Science . .+ https://ideotrope.org BS, EAS, Caltech 1998 __o War is Peace. home : 626.585.1712 _`\,_ Freedom is Slavery. work : 626.395.6981 (*)/ (*) Ignorance is Strength. cell : 626.437.2562 - Big Brother PGP : 0x55E0815F (request from http://pgp.mit.edu) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7vJw2nNfqE1XggV8RAgQXAJ476kSD8jO6NNH7IGjMmTxLhZ0IGACghoh9 gbYRSFm+WQt9MYar+oX08ZA= =//cZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-
weird reply question
while i was trying to test something related to that last question, i ran into something weird. if i send a message to my main email from one another machine in my office, i get the following behavior: header from received message: From: Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: test Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:14:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the header when i hit 'r' to reply: From: Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Bcc: Subject: Re: test Reply-To: In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: New Dream Network this doesn't happen if i comment out my 'alternates' line: set alternates = (will|william).*@.*(newdream|infinitejazz\.net|unixverse\.com) i have unset metoo set fast_reply and reply is bound to: :unset header\nreply i tried unsetting all of these various ones and it doesn't make a difference. i'm using 1.3.22.1i am i missing something obvious here? w -- GPG Public Key: http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:11:52PM, David Petrou wrote: [clip] set followup_to=no david ---end quoted text--- -- Para La Queja Mexica Este Sueño De America Celebramos La Aluna De Siempre, Ahorita -- Bertrand Cantat, Tostaky (Le Continent) Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED] °v° web : http://www.baby-linux.net _o_ homepage : http://www.baby-linux.net/binny icq uin : 99745024
Re: Q: how to not reply to myself in a group-reply?
i am pretty sure that metoo works for group reply as well. my guess is that you don't have 'alternates' set correctly or set at all... what is your 'alternates' line? that was it! thanks! w david
Re: alias file perms error
Yes, i finally got it sorted out. I had to give the editor value in
.bash_profile.
It works now.
regards,
Sharukh.
René Clerc muttered:
* Dr . Sharukh K . R . Pavri . [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-10-2001 16:34]:
| I am using mutt 1.2.5i with a hodge podge .muttrc. I have pinched the
| following from Roland Rosenfeld's keybindings :
|
| macro index \ea !$EDITOR ~/.mutt_alias\n:source ~/.mutt_alias\n \
| Edit aliases file and reload it
|
| but using esca gives the following error
I use the following (ctrl-a)
macro index \Ca !\${EDITOR} ~/.mutt/aliases\n:source ~/.mutt/aliases\n \
edit addressbook
I thinkt the problem lies with the $; I think it needs to be
escaped.
In your situation, I think mutt tries to execute the .mutt_alias file,
and that is, of cours, not possible.
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Birthdays are good for you. Statistics show that the people who
have the most live the longest.
-Rev. Larry Lorenzoni
--
Dr. Sharukh K. R. Pavri
Mumbai, India.
Re: Changing my From field
Thus spake Zane Crawford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): and in any case, neither of them take effect if I just compose a message out of the blue - is there some way to make it wait to change my From: header until *after* I've gotten back to the compose menu? try 'unset autoedit'. send-hooks are evaluated right before the editor is run. Unless you have To: already defined (which will not be the case in a new email, but will be in a followup) the hook will fail since To: will be null at that point. -- James [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/62C2F77D uri: http://oneiros.darkspire.net/ EBB8 AF14 8C43 2F12 7623 irc: EFnet / opn / tietnet C0AA C0AE 56D4 62C2 F77D PGP signature
Re: How to un-attach?
Arrrgh. I hate it when that happens ;) To make matters worse, I actually did look at the ? at the send menue. Yep. Looked right at it and never saw it. Sigh. Thanks for the reply, and sorry for the wasted bandwidth, folks. John On 10/04/01, 10:05:58AM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: Justin R. Miller writes: Thus spake John P. Verel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I sometimes accidentally attach the wrong file to a message. I can't figure out how to to un-attach it. Can anyone help on this? Try highlighting the attachment in the compose menu and hitting 'D' (however, not 'd', which changes the description of the attachment.) And it's even documented ;) Press ? in the send menu. D detach-filedelete the current entry -- John P. Verel Norwalk, Connecticut
Re: url_regexp ?
On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 11:33:22AM -0700, Taner Halicioglu wrote: Hmm... this doesn't seem to exist any more, and I want to alter the regexp for url detection... how can I do it now? I didn't find an obvious answer in the manual, but I didn't dig all that far... mutt 1.2.5, btw... For say coloring them or for locating them like urlview does? For coloring you do something like so: # match ftp addresses: color body cyan black ftp://[^ ]* # match http addresses: color body brightgreen black [[:alnum:]][-+.#_[:alnum:]]*@[-+.[:alnum:]]*[[:alnum:]] # match URLs: color bodycyan default URL:[^ ]* color error red black # global or # Colorize color bodycyan black (http|ftp|news|telnet|finger)://[^ ]* For urlview edit: $HOME/.urlview Edit the REGEXP entry. If you don't have one read man urlview. -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org Before you set out for revenge dig two graves. - Chinese Saying
Re: howto force pgp_create_traditional
Viktor -- ...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said... % David T-G wrote: % % % Unfortunately, pgp_create_traditional is only used with us-ascii mails, % % which kinda defeats its purpose in my case. This is extremely annoying, % % because it basically means, that I cannot talk to non-English speaking % % Outlook users. % % I don't really know a whole lot about this, but I thought that that was, % indeed, one of the big limitations of traditional signing. % % Have any non-English-speaking LookOut! users sent you PGP-signed mail? % I'd be quite interested in seeing what happens to their charset along % the way. Maybe Micro$oft has managed to break this in a completely new % way ;-) % % Unfortunately, no, it seems that I'm the only user of PGP-signed mail in Ah, well. % my Freundeskreis. (Don't know the English word and too lazy to look it % up. Actually, a very cool German song is called like this. Anyway ...) Maybe I'll look it up tomorrow :-) % % In any case, I've found a solution that is acceptable to me, although % it's just a dirty hack. I searched the archives again and came across a % post by Bruno Postle, where he suggests the following macro: % % macro compose S Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0x82C08753 Right... % % This was nothing for me, because in this case I had to turn off % pgp_autosign, sign the message myself, send the message and then turn % pgp_autosign back on. Too much work. % % However, using send-hooks and overloading the send-message-key, I now Ta-daa! :-) % have the following: % % send-hook . set pgp_autosign; macro compose y send-message % send-hook ~C [EMAIL PROTECTED] unset pgp_autosign; macro compose y 'Fgpg --armor --clearsign --local-user 0x23314340\nysend-message'# Christian Seewald % % And it works, perfectly. Great! So, I wonder, how do your non-us-ascii emails look when they've been clearsigned? % % Cheers, % Viktor % -- % Viktor Rosenfeld % WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/ :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
